NAIR SERVICE SOCIETY versus DISTT. OFFICER, KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND ORS.
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
NAIR SERVICE SOCIETY v. DISTT. OFFICER, KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND ORS. NOVEMBER I7, 2003 [V.N. KHARE CJ., S.B. SINHA AND DR. AR. LAKSHMANAN, JJ.] Service Law: A B Kera/a State and Subordinate Service Rules, 1958-Rules 15 to 17- C Constitution of India, 1950-Article 16(4)-Appointment of Sub-Engineers in State Electricity Board-Rules providing reservation including carry forward of vacancy not exceeding 50% and that every alternate appointment is for open competition (merit) and every succeeding alternate appointment for reserved candidates-State Public Service Commission preparing rank D list and also separate supplementary list recommending 239 names, 177 from main rank list and 62 from supplementary list-For getting reserved candidates, candidates I to 18 recommended from supplementary list of Muslims-Others not advised since main list got exhausted-20 candidates comprising of I I from open competition, 3 SCs, 3 OBC and 3 Muslims not joining duty-19th candidate in Muslim supplementary list claiming E appointment to one of the vacancies of Muslims, along with similar other writ petitioners-High Court directing Commission to advise candidu.ie from supplementary list-In writ appeals Division Bench holding that once main list got exhausted supplementary list also automatically gets extinguished-However, High Court directed appointment from F supplementary list-Correctness of-Held: Candidates not entitled to appointment based on supplementary list since that would exceed percentage of reservation beyond 50% against statutory protection violating 50:50 rule-However, appointments made pursuant to order of High Court not to be disturbed State Public Service Commission selects candidate for appointment in Government service for which Rules of Reservation laid down in Kerala State and Subordinate Service Rules, 1959 have to be followed. Rules IS to 17 provide for 50% reservation in the aggregate for SC, ST 11nd OBCs; and 551 G H 552 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (2003] SUPP. 5 S.C.R. A that every alternate appointment is for open competition (merit) and succeeding alternate appointment for reserved candidate. State Electricity Board sought preparation of a select list for appointment of Sub Engineers. State Public Service Commission prepared a rank list of 177 and also prepared separate supplementary lists. Commission B advised in all 239 names, drawing 177 names from the main rank list and 62 names from the supplementary list. For reservation candidates Commission advised names of candidate nos.I to 18 from among the supplementary list for Muslims. Commission could not advise further names from supplementary list as the main rank list got exhausted. Out of 89 candidates advised, 20 C candidates comprising of eleven from open competition, three SC's, three OBCs and three Muslims did not join duty. These non-joining duty (NJD) vacancies were reported to the Commission but no advice was made. Thereafter, candidate No.19 in the Muslim supplementary list filed a writ petition claiming appointment to one of these NJD vacancies of Muslims being the next candidate in the Muslim supplementary list. Commission contended D before the High Court that as the main rank list stood exhausted by advising the last of the candidates included therein. the supplementary list of reservation candidates also ceased to be in force as otherwise rule of 50:50 would stand violated. Single Judge of High Court allowed the petition and directed the Commission to advise names of candidates to NJD vacancies. E Commission then filed writ appeals. Division Bench of the High Court dismissed the appeals and directed that the petitioners in the original petition would be entitled to appointment based on the supplementary list despite its holding that once the main list got extinguished the supplementary list also automatically gets extinguished. Thereafter, the Commission implemented the decision of High Court and did not file any appeal against the order; therefore, F the present appellant-Society has filed instant appeals in public interest. Appellant contended that by the impugned judgment the backward turns alone are to be filled in whereas Rule 14 lays down that the open category turn is to be filled in first and then the backward turns; that the procedures indicates that in order to workout the rotation open competition candidates G would also be available; that Rule 15 provides tha
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex