NAHAR SINGH YADAV & ANR. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
[201 OJ 13 (ADDL.) S.C.R. 851 NAHAR SINGH YADAV & ANR. A V. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. (Special Leave Petition (C) No. 12981 of 2008) NOVEMBER 19, 2010 B [D.K. JAIN, V.S. SIRPURKAR AND G.S. SINGHVI, JJ.] Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - s. 406(2) - Power of Supreme Court to transfer cases and appeals - Criminal complaint - Allegation of fraudulent withdrawal of huge sum C of money in name GPF of class IV court employees by court staff - Issuance of notification u/s. 6 of 1946 Act by State Government to transfer investigation to CBI - Charge sheet filed by CBI against former judges and employees of district court - CBI seeking transfer of trial from Ghaziabad court to o some other court of competent jurisdiction, preferably Delhi - Maintainability of - Held: On issuance of notification by State Government uls. 6 of DSPE Act, CBI assumes role of an investigating agency and also of prosecuting agency in the particular case and, thus, it is entitled to move an E application u/s. 406(2) - However, apprehension entertained F by CBI that the trial of the case at Ghaziabad may not be fair, resulting in miscarriage of justice is misplaced - Apprehension of bias could not be based on a bald a/legation that trial judge and some of the named accused had been close associates and some of the witnesses are judicial officers - Acceptance of such a/legation, without something more substantial undermines the credibility and the independence of the entire judiciary of a State - Also plea that the court of Special Judge, CBI, Ghaziabad is already heavily over-burdened cannot be accepted - Application of G CBI for transfer of trial from Ghaziabad to any other place is dismissed- Penal Code, 1860- ss. 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 477A and 120-B - Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - ss. 851 H 852 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (2010) 13 (ADDL.) S.C.R. A 8, 9, 13(2) rlw s. 13 (1) (d) and 14 - Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 - s. 6 - Scam - Ghaziabad Provident Fund Scam - Transfer Petition - Judiciary. B s. 406(2) - Power of Supreme Court to transfer criminal trial - Exercise of - Factors to be kept in mind - Discussed. A.R. Antulay vs. R.S. Nayak and Anr. (1988) 2 SCC 602; Zahira Habibul/a H. Sheikh vs. State of Gujarat and Ors. (2004) 4 SCC 158; Maneka Sanjay Gandhi and Anr. vs. Rani Jethma/ani (1979) 4 SCC 167; Abdul Nazar Madani vs. State C of T.N. and Anr. (2000) 6 SCC 204; K. Anbazhagan Vs. D E F G Superintendent of Police and Ors. (2004) 3 SCC 767; Captain Amarinder Singh vs. Parkash Singh Badal and Ors. (2009) 6 SCC 260; R. Balakrishna Pillai vs. State of Kera/a (2000) 7 sec 129 - referred to. Case Law Reference: (1988) 2 sec 602 Referred to Para 10 (2004) 4 sec 158 Referred to Para 18 (1979) 4 sec 167 Referred to Para 19 c2000) 6 sec 204 Referred to Para 20 c2004) 3 sec 767 Referred to Para 21 (2009) 6 sec 260 Referred to Para 22 (2000) 1 sec 129 Referred to Para 23 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : SLP (Civil) No. 12981 of 2008. From the Judgment & Order dated 19.03.2008 of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 12660 of 2008. G.E. Vahanvati, AG, Mukul Rohtagi, S.R. Singh, Shail Kr. H Dwivedi, AAG, K.C. Kaushik, Braj Kishore Mishra, Abhishek NAHAR SINGH YADAV & ANR. v. UNION OF INDIA & 853 ORS. Tadav, Vikram, Tanushree Sinha, Prashant Bhushan, Viplav A Sharma (in-person), Chinmoy P. Sharma, T.A. Khan, A.K. Sharma, Anil Katiyar , B. Krishna Prasad, Gunnam Venkateswara Rao, Ashutosh Kumar Sharma, Vandana Mishra, Manoj Kumar Dwivedi, Ashok K. Srivastava, Diksha Rai, Shaiwal Srivastava, Sanjay Jain, Amit Kumar Sharma, B E.C. Agrawala, Manoj Prasad, Sadashiv Gupta, Satendra Singh Kashyap, Rohit Singh, Ajay Srivatava, Krishna Kumar Srivastava, D.N. Dubey, Nishant Yadav, Avnish Singh, Yash Pal Dhingra, Sunita Pandit, Himanshu Tyagi, R.S. Yadav, Ujjawal Pandey, Asha G. Nair, Ritesh Agrawal, Piyush Sharma, E.G. c ยท Vidyasagar, Vishwajit Singh, Veera Kaul Singh, Siddharth Sengar, Abhindra Maaheshwari, Pankaj Singh for the appearing parties. lhe Order of the Court was delivered by D.K. JAIN, J. 1. The short question raised by the Central Bureau of Investigation (for short "the CBI"), Anti Corruption Branch, Ghaziabad in their affidavit dated 15th July 2010, for D our consideration is whether or not the trial arising out of the chargesheet filed by the CBI in Case RC-1 (A)/2008/CBl/ACB/ E Ghaziaba
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex