NAGPUR IMPROVEMENT TRUST versus SHEELA RAMCHANDRA TIKHE
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
A B C D E F G H 1074 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2018] 10 S.C.R. NAGPUR IMPROVEMENT TRUST v. SHEELA RAMCHANDRA TIKHE (Civil Appeal No. 10853 of 2018) OCTOBER 31, 2018 [A. K. SIKRI AND ASHOK BHUSHAN, JJ.] Nagpur Improvement Trust Disposal Rules, 1988: s.5(2) β Disposal of surplus land β Policy decision in the year 1968 by appellant-Trust to dispose of 44.61 acres of land to the owners of the land from whom it was acquired by way of acquisition proceedings β Respondent (the owner from whom the land was acquired) filed application dated 3.9.1975 for re-allotment of entire 44.16 acres β On 6.10.1975 decision was taken to re-allot the 44.61 acres of land on lease to the respondent on certain terms and conditions β The decision was communicated to the respondent on 16.10.1975 β The respondent requested to reduce the amount of premium β Appellant on 9.6.1982 allocated to the respondent 24 acres out of 44.61 acres β Respondent acknowledged t54he allotment β Possession of the land was handed over on 11.11.1982 β The respondent thereafter requested the appellant to release remaining 20.61 acres of land to her β On 9.2.1989 appellant executed lease in favour of respondent in respect of 24 acres of land β Respondent filed suit seeking declaration that she was entitled to re-allotment of 20.61 acres of land β Trial court decreed the suit β Appellate court held that the respondent was not entitled for allotment β High Court, held that respondent was entitled for allotment of 20.61 acres of land β On appeal, held: Allotment of land was subject to statutory Rules β When policy decision was taken to dispose of surplus land (44.61 acres) and when 24 acres of land was allotted Land Disposal Rules, 1955 were applicable β Thereafter Land Disposal Rules, 1983 came into force and r. 5(2) thereof became applicable for disposal of land β Earlier resolution no longer could have been availed, after enforcement of 1983 Rules β Respondentβs claim for allotment of 20.61 acres was not covered by r.5(2) of 1983 Act β Hence no decree could have been passed contrary to statutory Rules β Nagpur Improvement Trust Land Disposal Rules, 1955. 1074 [2018] 10 S.C.R. 1074 A B C D E F G H 1075 Limitation Act, 1963: s.3(1) β Consideration of issue of limitation by appellate court β When such issue was not before trial court β Propriety of β Held: In view of s.3(1)entering into issue of limitation (when the same was not before trial court) was permissible. Allowing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 The allotment of land of the appellant-Trust was subject to statutory Rules, namely, Nagpur Improvement Trust Land Disposal Rules, 1955. The Resolution dated 03.05.1968 was passed by the Board for disposal of surplus land acquired for the drainage and sewage disposal scheme, during the period of enforcement of 1955 Rules. The allotment letter dated 16.10.1975 to the plaintiff of 44.61 acres of land was in furtherance of Resolution dated 03.05.1968. The plaintiff after receipt of the letter dated 16.10.1975 prayed for reduction of amount of premium demanded. Several letters were written by the plaintiff regarding premium and allotment, last being letter dated 02.03.1982 in which the plaintiff herself was not ready to accept the terms as communicated by letter dated 16.10.1975. The Trust on 09.06.1982, thus, has alloted only 24 acres out of 44.61 acres of land. [Paras 13 and 15] [1087-A, E-G] 1.2 The facts of the case and correspondence clearly indicate that at no point of time allotment of 44.61 acres was made in favour of the plaintiff. The decision to allot 44.61 acres was communicated on 16.10.1975 on terms and conditions mentioned therein. The plaintiff having expressed certain reservation with the conditions and asked for relaxation of conditions and the Trust after taking into consideration the entire facts and circumstances took a decision to allot only 24 acres of land out of 44.61 acres on 09.06.1982, there was never any firm allotment of 44.61 acres of land to the plaintiff giving any indefeasible right of allotment of 44.61 acres of land and the plaintiff herself has to be blamed for not getting allotment of entire 44.61 acres of land. [Para 15] [1087-G-H; 1088-A-B] 1.3 After the allotment of 24 acres of land on 09.06.1982, a new set of Rules for disposal of land of Nagpur Improvement NAGPUR IMPROVEMENT TRUST v. SHEELA RAMCHANDRA TIKHE A B C D E F G H 1076 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2018] 10 S.C.R. Trust was framed, namely, Nagpur Improvement Trust Land Disposal
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex