LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
βš–οΈ Ask the AI about your situation:πŸš— Car AccidentπŸ’Ό Work / Job🏠 Housing / EvictionπŸ‘ͺ Family / DivorceπŸ“‹ Contract DisputeπŸ’° Money Owed

MS. X versus MR. A AND OTHERS

Citation: [2024] 3 S.C.R. 947 · Decided: 18-03-2024 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: BHUSHAN RAMKRISHNA GAVAI · Disposal: Dismissed

cites 3 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

* Author
[2024] 3 S.C.R. 947 : 2024 INSC 216
Ms. X  
v.  
Mr. A and Others
(Criminal Appeal No. 1661 of 2024)
18 March 2024
[B.R. Gavai,* Rajesh Bindal and Sandeep Mehta, JJ.]
Issue for Consideration
Whether the High Court erred in quashing the criminal proceedings 
by exercising the powers under Section 482 of Cr.P.C in a complaint 
alleging offences under Sections 354D, 376(2)(n), 504 and 506 
read with 34 of the Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)
(s), 3(1)(w)(i), 3(2)(v) and 3(2)(v-a) of the Scheduled Castes and 
Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
Headnotes
Crime Against Women – Sexual intercourse based on 
promise of marriage – The Appellant-prosecutrix believed 
that the accused would marry her leading her to consent 
to establishing a sexual relationship with the accused – 
Subsequent pregnancy of the Appellant –Termination of 
pregnancy at the instance of the accused – Refusal of the 
appellant to marry the Appellant [Paras 3 - 3.4]
Crime Against Women – Narrative given by the prosecutrix 
in initial statement qua the abortion undergone – Changed 
substantially in the restatement – Version of events as given 
by the prosecutrix in the FIR totally contrary to the restatement 
[Paras 9, 15]. 
Crime Against Women – Sexual intercourse based on promise 
of marriage – Consideration of material on record by the 
High Court – The High Court referred to pertinent documents 
including the original complaint, restatement, medical reports 
of the prosecutrix and the statement of the doctor while 
quashing the proceedings [Para 8]. 
Panel Code, 1860 – s.375 – Legal concept of β€œconsent” in 
relation to Section 375, IPC – Engagement in sexual activity 
based on a false promise to marry – Propositions to be 
established – For the promise to marry to be false, it ought 
948
[2024] 3 S.C.R.
Digital Supreme Court Reports
to be given in bad faith per se and must also bear a direct 
nexus to the woman’s decision to engage in the sexual act 
[Para 11].
Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 – s.482 – Guidelines for 
exercise of powers under Section 482 of Cr.P.C – Power to be 
exercised to prevent abuse of the process of any court or to 
secure the ends of justice – Categories of cases illustrated – 
Powers under Section 482 of Cr.P.C should be exercised only 
in exceptional cases where there is no sufficient ground for 
proceeding against the accused [Paras 17-18].
Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 – s.482 – Quashing of 
Proceedings under – The High Court quashed the proceedings 
under IPC and the SC/ST Act citing insufficiency of evidence 
and material contradictions in the statements of the prosecutrix 
– Allegations in FIR and in the restatement of the prosecutrix 
do not prima facie indicate a false promise to marry by the 
accused – No infirmity in the approach adopted by the High 
Court – Appeal dismissed [Paras 15-19].
Held: Relying on Shambhu Kharwar v. State of Uttar Pradesh and 
Another, [2022] 7 SCR 156, wherein on similar facts the court came 
to the finding that the relationship between the parties was purely 
of a consensual nature. Present case would squarely fall under 
the guidelines given by this court in State of Haryana and Others 
v. Bhajan Lal and Others, [1992] Supp. 3 SCR 735, for exercising 
of powers under Section 482, CrPC - In the present case, even 
if the allegations made in the FIR and the material on which the 
prosecution relies, are taken at its face value, there were no sufficient 
grounds for proceeding against the accused [Paras 11, 15- 19]
Case Law Cited
Shambhu Kharwar v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another, 
[2022] 7 SCR 156 : 2022 SCC OnLine SC 1032; 
Pramod Suryabhan Pawar v. State of Maharashtra and 
Another, [2019] 11 SCR 423 : (2019) 9 SCC 608; State 
of Haryana and Others v. Bhajan Lal and Others, [1992] 
Supp. 3 SCR 735 : (1992) Supp (1) 335 – relied on.
Dr. Dhruvaram Murlidhar Sonar v. State of Maharashtra 
and Others, [2018] 13 SCR 920 :  (2019) 18 SCC 191 
– referred to.
[2024] 3 S.C.R. 
949
Ms. X v. Mr. A and Others
List of Acts
Penal Code, 1860; The Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes 
(Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989; Code of Criminal Procedure, 
1973.
List of Keywords
False promise of marriage; Consent; Sexual relationship; Forced 
abortion; Quashing of proceedings; Mini trial; Abuse of process of 
law; Miscarriage of justice.
Case Arising From
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Criminal Appeal No.1661 
of 2024
From the Judgment and Order dated 03.09.2

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.