LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

MOST REV. P.M.A. METROPOLITAN AND ORS. versus MORAN MAR MARTHOMA AND ANR.

Citation: [1995] SUPP. 1 S.C.R. 542 · Decided: 20-06-1995 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: R.M. SAHAI · Disposal: Disposed off

cites 1 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

A 
MOST REV. P.M.A. METROPOLITAN AND ORS. 
v. 
MORAN MAR MARTHOMA AND ANR. 
JUNE 20, 1995 
B 
[R.M. SAHAI, B.P. JEEVAN REDDY AND S.C. SEN, JJ.] 
Ecclesiastical and Canonical Law-Dispute between the Catholicos 
group and the Patriarch group in the Malankara Sy1ian Christian com-
munity-Constitution recognising spiritual but not temporal supremacy of the 
C Patriarch of Antioch over the Ma/ankara Church-Excommunication of 
Catholicos of the East by the Pabiarch-Wliether valid-Held, per curiam, the 
excon1munication was invalid. 
Ecclesiastical and Canonica/ Law-Dispute between the Catho/icos 
group and the Pafliarch group in the Ma/ankara Sy1ian Christian com-
D munity-Revival of Catho/icate of the East in 1912 with temporal powers over 
Malankara Church-Wlzether Patriarch's power over the Malankara Church 
reduced to a vanishing point-Held, per curia111, the Patriarch continues as 
supreme head of the Sy1ian 01thodox Church of which the Malankara Church 
is a division; he is spi1itually supe1ior to the Catholicos although he has no 
E temporal power over the Malankara Church or its properties. 
F 
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, s.9-Ecclesiastica/ Law-Constitution 
of the Malankara Christian Association of 1934 -Whether Malankara 
Church is episcopal in nature-Held, per curiam, it is episcopal to the extent 
declared in the 1934 Constitution the validity of which cannot be questioned 
now. 
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, s.9 r/w 0.1 Rule 3-Ecclesiastical 
Law-Wlzether p01ish churches are congregational-Held, per majority, c011-
not be decided without impleading parish churches; per cwiam, all churches 
G except those of Evangelistic Association, Simhasana or St. Mary are under 
spiritual and temporal control of the Ma/ankara Association in accordance 
with the 1934 Constitution-Words and Phrase;-'Episcopal', 
'Congregational'. 
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, S.9-Ecc/esiastica/ and Canonica/ 
H Law-Dispute between the Catho/icos group and the Pamarch group in the 
542 
-,.. 
' 
P.M.A. METROPOLITAN v. M.M. MARTIIOMA 
543 
Mala11kara Sy1ia11 Cluistian community-Patriarch group questioning the A 
creation of the Catholicos of the East and the 1934 Constitution adopted by 
the Catholicos group-Held, after issuing a Kalpana in 1958 accepting the 
Catholicos and consecrating him in 1964 the Patliarch group deemed to have 
abandoned all objectiom~Evidence Act, 1872 s.114-
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, s.<)---Whether suit for declaration that 
Malankara Church is episcopal is of a civil naatre and is maintainable-Held, 
per Sahai, 1., yes; civil cozats have jurisdiction to entertain suits for violation 
of fundamental 1ights-Constiattion of India, A1ticles 25, 26. 
B 
Places of W01ship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991-Whether bws a suit C 
for declaration that Malankara Church is episcopal-Held, per Sahai, I., No. 
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, s. Jl-Res Judicata-Royal Cowt of 
Travancore and Supreme Cowt upholding validity of the Constitution and 
creation of Catholicos-Held, operates as res judicata between pa11ies and 
binds the patriarch group. 
D 
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, S.11, Jl4-Kerala High Cowt accepting 
Hudaya canon produced by Patriarch group in the Vattipanam suit-Review 
petition of Catholicos group enteJtained on condition that finding regarding 
Patliarch 's power of exconununication under the canon will not be ques-
tionelf-High Cowt allowing review petition and invalidating excommunica-
tion of Malankara Metropolitan-Whether the acceptance of the canon still 
operates as res judicata against the Catholicos group and negatives their claim 
to validity of the 1934 Constitution-Held, per Sahai, !. No; with the review 
being allowed, the decision on binding effect of canon does not operate as 
res judicata between the pwties-Canonical law-Evidence Act, 1872-Ss.42, 
43. 
St. Thomas, one of the disciples of Jesus Christ came to India in 52 
A.D. to spread his message. The first ecumenical council was convened in 
E 
F 
325 A.D. at Nicea by the Roman emperor Constantine. Prelates from all 
parts and representatives of all dioceses in the Christian world attended G 
the synod. The ecclesiastical jurisdiction of the Christiandom was settled 
under four ecclesiastical heads and four Patriarchs were appointed over 
four Sees - Rome, Constantinople, Alexandria and Antioch. India was 
placed under the Patriarch of Antioch. The great Metropolitan of the East 
was proclaimed as the Catholicos of the East. 
H 
544 
SUPR

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.