MOHINDER SINGH(DEAD) THROUGH LRS AND ANOTHER versus NARAIN SINGH AND OTHERS
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
A B C D E F G H 256 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2023] 2 S.C.R. [2023] 2 S.C.R. 256 256 MOHINDER SINGH(DEAD) THROUGH LRS AND ANOTHER v. NARAIN SINGH AND OTHERS (Civil Appeal No (s). 3828 of 2017) MARCH 14, 2019 [AJAY RASTOGI , C. T. RAVIKUMAR AND BELA M. TRIVEDI, JJ.] Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 : ss. 2(52), 2(61), 502, 507(a) β Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 β ss. 3(5), 150 β Delhi Development Act, 1957 β Special provisions as to rural areas β Recorded Bhumidhar sold his land in a village in Delhi to one vide registered sale deed β He again sold some portion of his land to respondents vide sale deed in 1989 and their names were mutated subsequently β Appellants case that before the said sale deed could be executed in favour of the respondents, the appellants had come into possession over the subject land β Appellant never challenged the mutation order claiming adverse possession by filing appeal u/ s. 64 of the 1954 Act β Said order of mutation was set aside by Financial Commissioner holding that the said transfer was in contravention of s.33 of the 1954 Act and ordered that the land to be vested in Gaon Sabha β Challenged to, by respondent and the writ petition was dismissed β However, Division Bench held that once by issuance of a notification u/s. 507(a), the rural area-subject land is urbanised, it ceases to be rural area and be governed by the provisions of the 1954 Act in sequel thereto and proceedings under 1954 Act were non est β On appeal, held : On harmonizing the provisions of the 1954 Act and 1957 Act, once a notification has been published in exercise of power u/s. 507(a), the provisions of the 1954 Act cease to apply β In sequel thereto, the proceedings pending under the 1954 Act become non est and loses its legal significance β On facts, to do complete justice to the parties, the appellants directed to hand over physical possession of the subject land free from all encumbrances to the respondents β Constitution of India β Art.142. A B C D E F G H 257 Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1 The combined reading of the provisions clearly indicates that the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 will not cover such area as defined in the first instance which may or before the first day of November, 1956 be included in a Municipality. The βlandβ which has been defined u/s. 3(13) provides that except in sections 23 and 24, such of the land held or occupied for purpose connected with agriculture, horticulture or animal husbandry including pisciculture and poultry farming and further includes other categories which are part of land but at the same time, it does not include land occupied by building in belts or areas adjacent to Delhi town. [Para 25][268-D-E] 1.2 βDelhi townβ has been defined under Section 3(5) of the Act which clearly defines that areas which immediately before the establishment of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi were included in the limits of Delhi Municipality. There is complete exclusion of the land occupied by buildings adjacent to Delhi town which falls before the establishment of Municipal Corporation of Delhi and is not a land covered for the purpose by deciding rights of the parties under tenure holder under Chapter II of the Act, 1954. [Para 26][268-F-G] 1.3 Section 150(3), (4) and (5) of the Act indicate that if the Gaon Sabha area ceases to be included in rural areas as defined in the Act, 1957 by virtue of notification under Section 507 of the Act, the Gaon Sabha shall thereupon stand dissolved or if a portion of Gaon Sabha area ceases to be included in rural areas as aforesaid, the jurisdiction of the Gaon Sabha for that area ceases in respect of that portion and for that portion stands dissolved or to that extent, the size of the Gaon Sabha stands reduced as a result of a portion ceasing to be included in rural area. [Para 27][268-G-H; 269-A] 1.4 The Act, 1957 has been primarily enacted to have a uniform body to administer the Delhi Municipal Corporation to consolidate various bodies, local authorities, looking after the municipal affairs and to centralise for better administration and to overcome the problems being faced by various authorities as well as by the public. Section 2(52) defines the βrural areasβ which MOHINDER SINGH(DEAD) THROUGH LRS AND ANOTHER v. NARAIN SINGH AND OTHERS A B C D E F G H 258 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2023] 2 S.C.R. demonstrates that the area of Delhi which immediately before the establishment of a Corporation, falls within the local limits of the Distr
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex