MOHAMMED ZUBAIR CORPORAL NO. 781467-G versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
[2016] 9 S.C.R. 111 MOHAMMED ZUBAIR CORPORAL NO. 781467-G A v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 8643 of2009) DECEMBER 15, 2016 [T. S. THAKUR, CJI, DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD AND L. NAGESWARA RAO, JJ.] Armed Forces Regulation, 1964 - Regn. 425 - Air Force Rules, 1969 - r. 15(2j(g)(ii) - Growth of hair etc. by Air Force Personnel -Airman in the Indian Air Force, discharged from service since he asserted his right to retain a beard on religious grounds since he is a Muslim - Said order upheld by the High Court - On appeal, held: Maintenance of identity is a crucial element in the safety and security of the Forces - No material produced to indicate that the appellant professes a religious belief that would bring him within the ambit of Regn. 425(b) which applies to "personnefwhose religion prohibits ~the cutting off the hair or .shaving off the face of its members" - Thus, the Commanding Officer acted within his iurisdiction in the interest of maintaining discipline of the Air Force- Appellant having been enrolled as a member of the Air Force was necessarily required to abide by the discipline of the Force - Regulations and policies in regard to personal appearance are not intended to discriminate (]gains! religious beliefs nor do they have the effect of doing so - Their object and purpose is tp ensure uniformity, cohesiveness, discipline and order, indispensable to every armed force of the Union - Thus, the order of High Court upheld - Constitution of India - Art. 33 - Armed Forces. Appellant was enrolled as Airman in the Indian Air Force. He filed an application seeking permission to keep a beard on religious grounds since he is a Muslim. He was granted provisional permission. Thereafter, the appellant was directed to shave off his beard in view of the subsequent policy of the Air Force. The appellant, however, asserted his right to retain a beard. Eventually, he was discharged from service. The appellant then filed a writ petition. The Single Judge of the High Court dismissed the petition holding that maintaining a beard was not an integral part of the religion professed by the appellant. The said order was upheld by the Division Bench. Hence, the instant appeals. 111 B c D E F G H 112 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2016] 9 S.C.R. A Dismissing the appeals, the Court B c D E F G H HELD: 1.1 No material has been produced to indicate that the appellant professes a religious belief that would bring him within the ambit of Regulation 425(b) which applies to "personnel whose religion prohibits the cutting off the hair or shaving off the face of its members". The policy letters issued by the Air Headquarters from time to time do not override the provisions of Regulation 425(b) which have a statutory character. The policy circulars are only clarificatory or supplementary in nature. The policy letter of 8.05.1980 did initially permit an airman professing Islam to sport a beard of a prescribed length. This was revisited by the Air Headquarters on 10.08.1982 and on 6.10.1999. On 6.10.1999 the Air Headquarters made it clear that if an airman seeks to grow a beard after joining service he would require the approval of the Commanding Officer who would ascertain the reasons for his decision, advice the individual to maintain the beard in a neat, trim and tidy manner and that once permitted he would not be allowed to shave off his beard. Evidently, these provisions have been introduced having due regard to the security concerns inherent in maintaining identity in the Armed Forces. Maintenance of identity is a crucial element in the safety and security of the Forces._ particularly in the context of the threat of infiltration. The policy was again revisited on 24.02.2003. This time a limited protection was granted for those who had a beard prior to 1.01.2002 at the time of enrolment but the policy also stated that no person would after joining service be allowed to maintain a beard. This position'was clarified on 9.06.2003 by stating that personnel whose religion demands sporting a beard, would be allowed to do so provided they were granted permission prior to the date of the letter or had grown a beard at the time of joining Air Force. So long as the provisions of Regulation 425 (which have a statutory effect) are not breached, a mere policy can be revisited and modulated in the interest of the Force. The policy documents are only clarificatory in nature.
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex