LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

MOHAMED IBRAHIM AND ORS. versus VINAYAKA MISSION UNIVERSITY AND ORS.

Citation: [2012] 3 S.C.R. 550 · Decided: 22-02-2012 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: RAJENDRA MAL LODHA · Disposal: Dismissed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

A 
B 
[2012] 3 S.C.R. 550 
MOHAMED IBRAHIM AND ORS. 
v. 
VINAYAKA MISSION UNIVERSITY AND ORS. 
(Civil Appeal No. 2454 of 2012) 
FEBRUARY 22, 2012 
[R.M. LODHA AND H.L. GOKHALE, JJ.] 
Education - Medical Education - Screening test for 
students with foreign medical qualifications - Eligibility criteria 
C for screening test - Eligibility of "primary medical qualification" 
- Appel/ants-students, who had completed medical course 
from the off-shore campus of VMRF in Thailand, claimed 
eligibility for screening test - Claim upheld by Single Judge 
of High Court but negated by the Division Bench -
On 
D appeal, held: The eligibility criteria provided in the 2002 
Regulations make it clear that a candidate intending to 
appear in the screening test must, inter-a/ia, possess primary 
medical qualification -
Such qualification must be a 
recognised qualification for enrollment as a medical 
E practitioner in the country in which the institution awarding 
such qualification is situated - In the instant case, the 
provisional degree awarded by VMRF, Thailand Off-shore 
campus to appellants-students was not recognised by the 
Medical Council of Thailand - Appellants-students were not 
F entitled to register the degree awarded to them by VMRF with 
the Medical Council of Thailand - The provisional degree 
awarded by VMRF to these students, therefore, did not 
amount to primary medical qualification - The view taken by 
the Division Bench that the appellants-students did not 
G possess eligibility of primary medical qualification, thus, 
cannot be said to suffer from any illegality - Screening Test 
Regulations, 2002 of the Medical Council of India -
Regulations 2(f) and 4(1) - Indian Medical Council Act, 1956. 
H 
550 
MOHAMED IBRAHIM AND ORS. v. VINAYAKA 
551 
MISSION UNIVERSITY AND ORS. 
The Government of India, vide notification issued in 
2006 had accorded its approval to the proposal of 
Vinayaka Mission's Research Foundation, Salem, now 
Vinayaka Mission University ("VMRF") as a deemed 
University for starting an Off-shore Campus offering 
medical programmes at Bangkok, Thailand. The approval 
so granted was inter alia subject to two conditions, 
namely - 1) the degree shall be awarded by the VMRF to 
the students studying at and passing of the Off-shore 
Campus, Thailand by clearly stating that the degree has 
been awarded by VMRF, Deemed University, Bangkok, 
Thailand Off-shore campus and 2) the.degree awarded to 
the students shall be treated as a foreign medical degree 
and such students would be required to qualify the 
screening test as per the provisions of Indian Medical 
Council Act, 1956 and Screening Test Regulations, 2002 
of the Medical Council of India. 
The appellants-students, who had completed 
medical course from VMRF, Deemed University, 
Bangkok, Thailand Off-shore Campus and were issued 
a provisional certificate to that effect in the year 2009 by 
VMRF, applied for screening test through VMRF to the 
National Board of Examination (NBE). NBE did not 
respond to such applications. VMRF then filed writ 
petition which was allowed by a Single Judge of the High 
Court. In intra court appeal, however, the Division Bench 
set-aside the judgment of the Single Judge holding that 
the appellants-students did not possess eligibility of 
primary medical qualification. Hence the present appeals. 
Dismissing the appeals, the Court 
HELD: 1.1. A bare look at the eligibility criteria 
provided in Regulation 4(1) of the Screening Test 
Regulations, 2002 of the Medical Council of India leaves 
no manner of doubt that a candidate who intends to 
appear in the screening test must, inter-alia, possess 
A 
B 
c 
D 
E 
F 
G 
H 
552 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[2012) 3 S.C.R. 
A primary medical qualification. Such qualification must be 
a recognised qualification for enrollment as a medical 
practitioner in the country in which the institution 
awarding such qualification is situated. [Para 11) [557-B-
C] 
B 
1.2. Admittedly, the provisional degree awarded by 
the VMRF to these students is not recognised by the 
Medical Council of Thailand. These students, who claim 
to have completed their course in the off-shore campus 
of VMRF, are not entitled to register the degree awarded 
C to them by VMRF with the Medical Council of Thailand. 
The provisional degree awarded by VMRF to these 
students, therefore, does not amount to primary medical 
qualification. The view taken by the Division Bench that 
the students do not possess eligi

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.