MODERN DENTAL COLLEGE AND RESEARCH CENTRE AND OTHERS versus STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
[2012] 2 S.C.R 685 - MODERN DENTAL COLLEGE AND RESEARCH CENTRE A AND OTHERS v. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS. IA Nos. 57 & 59 IN B (Civil Appeal No. 4060 of 2009) APRIL 3, 2012 [DEEPAK VERMA, DR. B.S. CHAUHAN, K.S. RADHAKRISHNf-N, JJ.] C Education/Educational Institutions: Medical and Dental Colleges - Private unaided medical/dental colleges in the State of Madhya Pradesh - Admission - Unfilled NRI seats - Whether unfilled NRI seats are to be transfeffed to general o pool and be shared equally to be filled up oil the basis of the Common Entrance Test conducted by the State level Committee or the Common Entrance Test conducted by the association of Private Dental and Medical Colleges - Held: It , is open to the unaided professional educational institutions E to fill up unfilled NRI seats through the entrance test conducted by them subject to the conditions laid down in *lnamdar case - The policy of reservation should not be enforced by the State nor any quota or percentage of admissions could be carved out to be appropriated by the F State in unaided educational institution - In the matter of filling up of unfilled NRI seats, the principles laid down in **TMA Pai and *lnamdar cases were not correctly applied in ***R.D. Gari - M.P. Admission Rules, 2008 - r.8 - Madhya Pradesh Niji Vyavsayik Shikshan Sanstha (Prave_sh Ka Viniyaman Avam G Shulk ka Nirdharan) Adhiniyam, 2007. **TMA Pai Foundation and Others v. State of Karnataka . and Others (2002) a sec 481: 2002 (3) Suppl. SCR 587; **TMA Pai Foundation and Others v. State of Karnataka and 685 H 686 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2012) 2 S.C.R. A Others (1994) 4 SCC 728; **TMA Pai Foundation and Others v. State of Karnataka and Others (1995) 5 SCC 220: 1995 (2) Suppl. SCR 608; AP (P) Engg. College Management Assn. v. Govt. of A.P. (2000) 10 SCC 565; *P.A. lnamdar and others V. State of Karnataka and others (2005) 6 sec 537: 8 2005 (2) Suppl. SCR 603 - relied on. Modern Dental College and Research Centre and Ors. v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors. (2009) 7 SCC 751: 2009 (9) SCR 845; ***R.D. Gardi Medical College and Anr. etc. v. State of M.P. and Ors. (2010) 10 SCC 225: 2010 (12) C SCR 692 - referred to. Case Law Reference: 2002 (3) Suppl. SCR 587 relied on Para 3 D 2005 (2) Suppl. SCR 603 relied on Para 3, 11 2009 (9) SCR 845 referred to Para 4 2010 (12) SCR 692 referred to Para 5,7,8, 12,13 E . (1994) 4 sec 128 relied on Para 10 1995 (2) Suppl. SCR 608 relied on Para 10 (2000) 1 o sec 565 relied on Para 10 F CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: I.A. No. 57 & 59. IN Civil Appeal No. 4060 of 2009. G From the Judgment ~ Order dated 15.05.2009 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in W.P. No. 2732 of 2009. C.A. Sundaram, Dr. Rajeev Dhawan, Puneet Jain, Sushi! H Kumar Jain, Pragati Neekhra, Suryanaryana Singh, B.S. MODERN DENTAL COLLEGE CENTRE v. STATE OF 687 MADHYA PRADESH Banthia, Vikas Upadhyay, Gaurav Sharma, Prathia M. Singh, A Surbhi Mehta, Abhinav Mukerji, Amit Kumar, Avijit Mani Tripathi, Sunil Kumar Jain, R.C. Kohli, Harish Pandey, Dharmendra Kumar Sinha, Arun Kumar Beriwal, Sanjay K. Agrawal for the appearing parties. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J. 1. We are in these applications called upon to decide the question as to whether B the unfilled NRI seats are to be trani>ferred to general pool and C be shared equally to be filled up on the basis of the Common Entrance Test conducted by the State level Committee - Vyavsayik Pariksha Mandal (VYAti'AM) or by the Common Entrance Test conducted by the Association of Private Dental ยท and Medical Colleges (APDMC), so 'far as the private unaided D medical/dental colleges in the State of Madhya Pradesh are concerned. 2. Applicants, herein had filed Writ Petition No. 2732 of 2009 before the High Court of Madhya Pradesh (Jabalpur) challenging the constitutional validity of Madhya Pradesh Niji E Vyavsayik Shikshan Sanstha (Pravesh Ka Viniyaman Avam Shulk ka Nirdharan) Adhiniyam, 2007 (in short 'the Act) and the Rules framed thereunder. The High Court vide its judgment dated 15.5.2009 repelled the challenge to the Act and the Rules but declared that the provisions of Rule 10(2)(iii) of 2009 as F ultra vires. The High Court also held that the Judgment would not affect the Common Entrance Test already conducted by VYAPAM for the year 2009-10. The above-mentioned Writ Petition was di
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex