LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
โš–๏ธ Ask the AI about your situation:๐Ÿš— Car Accident๐Ÿ’ผ Work / Job๐Ÿ  Housing / Eviction๐Ÿ‘ช Family / Divorce๐Ÿ“‹ Contract Dispute๐Ÿ’ฐ Money Owed

MITHILESH KUMAR SINGH versus STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Citation: [2014] 13 S.C.R. 1362 · Decided: 11-12-2014 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: T.S. THAKUR · Disposal: Case Allowed

Cited by 1 judgment(s) · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

A 
B 
[2014] 13 S.C.R. 1362 
MITH I LESH KUMAR SINGH 
V. 
STATE OF RAJASTHAN 
(Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 240 of 2011) 
DECEMBER 11, 2014 
[T. S. THAKUR, ADARSH KUMAR GOEL AND 
R. BANUMATHI, JJ.] 
C 
Investigation- Transfer of- From local police to Central 
Bureau of Investigation (CBI) - In the case of mysterious 
death of a college girl - Sought by the father of the girl 
(petitioner)-Alleging that the death was result of ragging by 
the senior students and that there were deficiencies and 
0 
contradictions in the findings of the investigating agency -
Held: Per Majority: In view of sensitivity of the case and the 
circumstances pointed out by the petitioner, the investigation 
needs to be transferred from local police to CBI - Per 
Minority: In the present' case, the materials show that proper 
E investigation was conducted by the local police - Handing 
over of instigation to CBI can be done only in exceptional 
circumstances - There is no special situation in the present 
case warranting investigation by CBI. 
Investigation- Fairness and propriety of- Requirement 
F for - Held: Per Thakur, J. : In an adversarial system of 
administration of justice, fairness of investigation is the very 
first requirement for the fairness of a trial. 
Investigation- Transfer of - From one agency to another 
- Criteria for -
To be adopted by the Court - Held: Per 
G Thakur, J. : The court, in exercise of its extra-ordinary power 
should transfer the investigation only when there is 
reasonable apprehension about justice becoming a victim 
because of shabby or partisan investigation - The sensibility 
of the victims or their next kin is not wholly irrelevant - The 
H 
1362 
MITHILESH KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN 
1363 
hallmark of a transfer is the perceived independence of the A 
transferred more than any other consideration. 
Allowing the Writ petition, the Court 
HELD: MAJORITY OPINION : . 
PER T.S. THAKUR, J. 
B 
1. Importance of a fair and proper investigation 
cannot be understated. In an adversarial system of 
administration of justice, fairness of investigation is the 
very first requirement for the fairness of a trial. A trial C 
based on a partisan motivated, one sided, or biased 
investigation can hardly be fair. That is because while 
. the trialยทitself may be procedurally correct, the essence 
and the purpose thereof may be vitiated by an unfair or 
ineffective investigation. [Para 3][1369-D-F] 
2. It is only when there is a reasonable 
apprehension about justice becoming a victim because 
D 
of shabby or partisan investigation that the Court may 
step in and exercise its extra ordinary powers. The 
sensibility of the victims of the crime or their next of kin 
E 
is not wholly irrelevant in such situations. Unless the 
Court sees any design behind the prayer for transfer, 
the same must be seen as an attempt only to ensure that 
the truth is discovered. The hallmark of a transfer is the 
perceived independence of the transferee more than any F 
other consideration. Discovery of truth is the ultimate 
purpose of any investigation and who can do it better 
than an agency that is independent. [Para 9][1373-E-H; 
1374-A-B] 
3. Transfer can be ordered once the Court is G 
satisfied on the available material that such a course will 
promote the cause of justice, in a given case. In the 
present case circumstances leading to the death of 
young college student girl have become the subject 
H 
1364 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[2014] 13 S.C.R. 
A matter of investigation. The issue is sensitive not only 
because of loss of an invaluable human life but also 
because of the reasons which are sought to be 
attributed for the sordid affair. The circumstances which 
the petitioner has referred to in the writ petition and the 
B written submissions as also the contentions that were 
urged before this court in the course of the hearing may 
or may not be conclusive in their import but those 
circumstances need to be suitably looked into by an 
independent investigating agency like the CBI lest an 
c incomplete, indifferent or ineffective investigation leads 
to failure of justice. Therefore, the investigation is 
directed to be transferred to the Central Bureau of 
Investigation. Therefore, the investigation is directed to 
be transferred to the Central Bureau of Investigation. 
o [Paras 12, 13 and 14][1375-C-H] 
Manu Sharma v. State (NCT of Delhi) (2010) 6 
SCC 1 : 2010 (4) SCR 103; Nirmal Singh Kah/on 
v. State of Punjab (2009) 1 SC

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.