MIHIR RAJESH SHAH versus STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
[2025] 11 S.C.R. 291 : 2025 INSC 1288 Mihir Rajesh Shah v. State of Maharashtra and Another (Criminal Appeal No. 2195 of 2025) 06 November 2025 [B.R. Gavai, CJI and Augustine George Masih,* J.] Issue for Consideration Whether in each and every case, even arising out of an offence under Penal Code, 1860 now Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 would it be necessary to furnish grounds of arrest to an accused either before arrest or forthwith after arrest; whether, even in exceptional cases, where on account of certain exigencies it will not be possible to furnish the grounds of arrest either before arrest or immediately after arrest, the arrest would be vitiated on the ground of non-compliance with the provisions of Section 50 of the CrPC 1973 (now Section 47 of BNSS 2023). Headnotesβ Constitution of India β Art.22(1) β Constitutional mandate of β Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 β s.50 β Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 β s.47 β Whether in each and every case, even arising out of an offence under Penal Code, 1860 now Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 would it be necessary to furnish grounds of arrest to an accused either before arrest or forthwith after arrest: Held: Constitutional mandate of informing the arrestee the grounds of arrest is mandatory in all offences under all statutes including offences under IPC 1860 (now BNS 2023) β The grounds of arrest must be communicated in writing to the arrestee in the language he/she understands β In case(s) where, the arresting officer/ person is unable to communicate the grounds of arrest in writing on or soon after arrest, it be so done orally β The said grounds be communicated in writing within a reasonable time and in any case at least two hours prior to production of the arrestee for remand proceedings before the magistrate β In case of non-compliance, the arrest and subsequent remand would be rendered illegal and the person will be at liberty to be set free β The requirement of *βAuthor 292 [2025] 11 S.C.R. Supreme Court Reports informing the arrested person the grounds of arrest, in the light of and u/Art.22(1) of the Constitution of India, is not a mere formality but a mandatory binding constitutional safeguard included in Part III of the Constitution under the head of Fundamental Rights β Thus, if a person is not informed of the grounds of his arrest as soon as maybe, it would amount to the violation of his fundamental rights curtailing his right to life and personal liberty u/Art.21, rendering the arrest illegal. [Paras 56, 40] Constitution of India β Art.22(1) β Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 β s.50 β Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 β s.47Β β Whether, even in exceptional cases, where on account of certain exigencies it will not be possible to furnish the grounds of arrest either before arrest or immediately after arrest, the arrest would be vitiated on the ground of non-compliance with the provisions of Section 50 of the CrPC 1973 (now Section 47 of BNSS 2023): Held: Non-supply of grounds of arrest in writing to the arrestee prior to or immediately after arrest would not vitiate such arrest on the grounds of non-compliance with the provisions of s.50 of the CrPC 1973 (now s.47 of BNSS 2023) provided the said grounds are supplied in writing within a reasonable time and in any case two hours prior to the production of the arrestee before the magistrate for remand proceedings β In cases where the police are already in possession of documentary material furnishing a cogent basis for the arrest, the written grounds of arrest must be furnished to the arrestee on his arrest β However, in exceptional circumstances such as offences against body or property committed in flagrante delicto, where informing the grounds of arrest in writing on arrest is rendered impractical, it shall be sufficient for the police officer or other person making the arrest to orally convey the same to the person at the time of arrest β Later, a written copy of grounds of arrest must be supplied to the arrested person within a reasonable time and in no event later than two hours prior to production of the arrestee before the magistrate for remand proceedings β The remand papers shall contain the grounds of arrest and in case there is delay in supply thereof, a note indicating a cause for it be included for the information of the magistrate β Two-hour threshold before production for remand strikes a judicious balance between safegu
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex