LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
βš–οΈ Ask the AI about your situation:πŸš— Car AccidentπŸ’Ό Work / Job🏠 Housing / EvictionπŸ‘ͺ Family / DivorceπŸ“‹ Contract DisputeπŸ’° Money Owed

MAHESH DAMU KHARE versus THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.

Citation: [2024] 11 S.C.R. 886 · Decided: 26-11-2024 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: B.V. NAGARATHNA · Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

cites 4 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2024] 11 S.C.R. 886 : 2024 INSC 897
Mahesh Damu Khare 
v. 
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. 
(Criminal Appeal No. 4882 of 2024)
26 November 2024
[B.V. Nagarathna and 
Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh,* JJ.]
Issue for Consideration
The High Court dismissed the petition filed u/s.482 of CrPC for 
quashing FIR registered u/ss.376, 420, 504 and 506 IPC holding, 
inter alia, that the offence under Section 376 of IPC is an offence 
against the society which would require further investigation into 
the matter and does not warrant interference.
Headnotes†
Penal Code, 1860 – s.376, 420, 504 and 506 – Complainant filed 
a complaint alleging that the appellant had cheated on her by 
forcibly engaging in sexual intercourse without her consent 
in his house and in the rented rooms from 2008 to 2017 by 
giving false promises of marriage, depositing fixed amount in 
her bank account and also promising to purchase a house for 
her – FIR was registered – Appellant sought to quash the said 
FIR, however, the petition was dismissed by the High Court:
Held: In the instant case, even assuming that the appellant had 
made the promise since 2008 when they met for the first time, 
the fact that they remained unmarried for a long period till 2017 
without there being any protest or objection by the complainant, 
does not indicate the intention at the initial stage itself to make the 
promise falsely to marry the complainant – Making an allegation 
of non-fulfilment of promise to marry without undue delay by the 
promissee would, on the other hand, be an indicator of a false 
promise being made from the initial stage – In the present case, 
what is not in dispute is that the physical relationship between 
the appellant and the complainant continued for a long period of 
about a decade and as such it is difficult to infer that the appellant 
had made a false promise since the initial stage and continued to 
make false promises to marry her on the basis of which she also 
*Author
[2024] 11 S.C.R. 
887
Mahesh Damu Khare v. 
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. 
continued to have physical relationship with him – The longer the 
duration of the physical relationship between the partners without 
protest and insistence by the female partner for marriage would be 
indicative of a consensual relationship rather than a relationship 
based on false promise of marriage by the male partner and thus, 
based on misconception of fact – The criminal liability attached to 
such false promise would be diluted after such a long passage of 
time and in light of the fact that no protest was registered by the 
complainant during all those years – Such a prolonged continuation 
of physical relationship without demurral or remonstration by the 
female partner, in effect takes out the sting of criminal culpability and 
neutralises it – It appears that discontinuance of financial support to 
the complainant, rather than the alleged resiling from the promise 
to marry by the appellant appears to be the triggering point for 
making the allegation by the complainant after a long consensual 
relationship for about nine years – In light of the aforesaid facts 
and circumstances, in the present case no prima facie case has 
been made out about commission of an offence of rape punishable 
under Section 376 IPC – Further, on perusal of the FIR it is also 
noted that no allegations of cheating have been made against the 
appellant to fall within the scope of Section 420 IPC nor of any of 
the offences under Sections 504 and 506 of the IPC – Therefore, 
under the circumstances, the appellant is entitled to the relief claimed 
for quashing the complaint/FIR. [Paras 25, 27, 28, 30, 34, 35]
Case Law Cited
State of Haryana and Ors. v. Bhajan Lal and Ors. [1992] Supp. 
3 SCR 735 : (1992) Supp 1 SCC 335; Neeharika Infrastructure 
Private Limited v. State of Maharashtra & Ors. [2021] 4 SCR 1044Β : 
(2021) 19 SCC 401; Shambhu Kharwar v. State of Uttar Pradesh 
and Anr. [2022] 7 SCR 156 : 2022 SCC OnLine SC 1032; Niam 
Ahmed v. State (NCT of Delhi) [2023] 1 SCR 1061 : 2023 SCC 
OnLine SC 89; Deepak Gulati v. State of Haryana [2013] 6 SCR 
544 : (2013) 7 SCC 675 – relied on.
R.P. Kapur v. State of Punjab [1999] Supp. 1 SCR 121 : AIR 1960 
SC 866 – referred to.
List of Acts
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012; Penal 
Code, 1860.
888
[2024] 11 S.C.R.
Digital Supreme Court Reports
List of Keywords
False promise of marriage; Forciable sexual intercourse; Consent; 
Long consensual r

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.