LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

MAHANADI COAL FIELDS LTD. & ANR. versus MATHIAS ORAM & ORS.

Citation: [2025] 1 S.C.R. 158 · Decided: 02-01-2025 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: BELA M. TRIVEDI · Disposal: Dismissed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2025] 1 S.C.R. 158 : 2025 INSC 22
Mahanadi Coal Fields Ltd. & Anr. 
v. 
Mathias Oram & Ors.
(Miscellaneous Application No. 2662/2023 
In 
M.A. No. 231/2019 
In 
Special Leave Petition (C) No. 6933 of 2007)
03 January 2025
[Bela M. Trivedi* and Satish Chandra Sharma, JJ.]
Issue for Consideration
Issue arose as regards the extension of the term of the Claims 
Commission, and determining the Rehabilitation and Resettlement 
benefits of the villages acquired by the appellant-MCL
Headnotes†
Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 
1957  – Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in 
Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 
2013 – Compensation claim – Rehabilitation and Resettlement 
benefits – Determination, of land oustees of four acquired 
villages – Villages acquired by the appellant-MCL – Claims 
Commission appointed for determining the claim of 
compensation in respect of vast portions of lands acquired – 
Commission set up for carrying out the exercise for 14 
villages – Report submitted by the Commission in relation to 
the village Gopalpur – Recommendations approved and made 
it an order of the Court – Following the Gopalpur model, the 
Commission submitted further reports which were approved – 
Several applications moved by the MCL and land owners 
seeking a range of directions – By order dated 03.11.2022, 
this Court held that the Gopalpur Model for determining the 
compensation was applied in respect of 10 villages which 
reports were approved by the courts, and the issues stood 
finalized and there could be no re-determination, and this Court 
* Author
[2025] 1 S.C.R. 
159
Mahanadi Coal Fields Ltd. & Anr. v. 
Mathias Oram & Ors.
would not entertain Miscellaneous Application – In regard to 
four villages-Tumulia, Jhupuranga, Ratansara, and Kirpsara, 
no award approved on the said date – However, Miscellaneous 
Applications filed – Directions sought as regards extension 
of time to finalise the report of village Ratansara by the Nodal 
Officer, Claims Commissioner; directions to Commission to 
prepare the PAF/PDF list determining R&R benefits of any or 
all four remaining villages out of 14 villages acquired by the 
MCL; and directions to direct the Commission to decide their 
cases at the earliest:
Held: No further order for extension of the term of the Commission 
can be passed – Directions as prayed for by the Committee to 
direct the Commission to prepare PAF/PDF list determining the 
Rehabilitation and Resettlement benefits of the four villages cannot 
be issued – Commission entertained the cases filed by the land 
oustees of whose reports have already been finalized and approved 
by this Court – Commission also travelled beyond the directions 
given by this Court by entertaining the issues raised by the villagers 
and land oustees of four villages with regard to Rehabilitation 
and Resettlement benefits – Only additional exercise which the 
Commission had to carry out was the differential payable after 
the re-determination in respect of all the elements-market value, 
solatium, and further interest – This Court clearly earmarked the 
task of the Commission and of the other authorities and given final 
directions which had to be followed – Commission appears to have 
entertained the issues with regard to the suitability of resettlement 
sites for shifting of the eligible land oustees – Commission should 
not have entertained any of these issues, when all the issues 
alluded and dealt with thoroughly by this Court vide order dated 
03.11.2022 – MCL already raised objections with regard to the 
method of calculation, the said issue was transferred to the High 
Court and is pending – High Court to decide the writ petition 
expeditiously – MCL to make payment towards the compensation 
immediately after the final judgment passed by the High Court. 
[Paras 15-26]
List of Acts
Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act, 1957; 
Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, 
Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.
160
[2025] 1 S.C.R.
Digital Supreme Court Reports
List of Keywords
Compensation claim; Commission; Mahanadi Coalfields; 
Compensation to land oustees; Rehabilitation and resettlement 
benefits; Gopalpur Model . 
Case Arising From
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Miscellaneous Application No. 
2662 of 2023
In
M.A. No. 231 of 2019
In
Special Leave Petition (C) No. 6933 of 2007
From the Judgment and Order dated 03.11.2022 of the Supreme 
Court o

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.