LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

MAHAMUDUL HASSAN versus UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS

Citation: [2010] 12 S.C.R. 257 · Decided: 08-10-2010 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: MARKANDEY KATJU, T.S. THAKUR · Disposal: Dismissed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2010] 12 S.C.R. 257 
MAHAMUDUL HASSAN 
V. 
UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS 
(Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 109 of 2010) 
OCTOBER 08, 2010 
[MARKANDEY KATJU AND T.S. THAKUR, JJ.] 
Constitution of India, 1950: 
A 
B 
Articles 32 and 161 - Writ petition challenging the order c 
passed under the Foreigners Act whereby a Bangladesh 
national was sentenced for illegally entering India - HE/ 0: 
The petitioner has a right to appeal to High Court on judicial 
side -
He can also approach the executive authority 
concerned uls 432 CrPC or to the Governor under Article 161 
0 
of the Constitution - Supreme Court being a judicial Court 
has no such powers - Writ petition dismissed - Foreigners 
Act, 1946 - Code of Civil Procedure, 1973 - s.432. 
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION : Writ Petition 
(Criminal) No. 109 of 2010. 
Petition Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India. 
Shanti Ranjan Das (for Sarla Chandra) for the Petitioner. 
The following order of the Court was delivered 
ORDER 
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 
E 
F 
This is a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution 
G 
making various prayers. 
Petitioner, who is a Bangladesh national, has been 
convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dakshin Dinajpur 
257 
H 
258 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[2010] 12 S.C.R. 
A at Balurghat, West Bengal under the Foreigners Act for illegally 
entering India and sentenced to undergo two years rigorous 
imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rupees ten thousand. 
In our opinion, if the petitioner has a grievance against that 
8 judgment, he has a right of appeal to the High Court on the 
judicial side. He can also approach the concerned executive 
authority under Section 432 Cr.P.C. or to the Governor under 
Article 161 of the Constitution of India. This is a judicial Court 
and hence this Court has no power which the executive has 
under Section 432 Cr.P.C or which the Governor has under 
C Article 161 of the Constitution. 
With these observations, the Writ Petition is dismissed. 
R.P. 
Writ petition dimissed.