LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

M/S TRIVENI GLASS LIMITED REP. BY ITS DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER (SALES AND P.R.) SHRI R.K. SINHA versus COMMISSIONER OF TRADE TAX, U.P.

Citation: [2023] 13 S.C.R. 1095 · Decided: 09-10-2023 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: S. RAVINDRA BHAT · Disposal: Dismissed

cites 7 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

CASE DETAILS
M/S TRIVENI GLASS LIMITED REP. BY ITS DEPUTY 
GENERAL MANAGER (SALES AND P.R.) SHRI R.K. SINHA
v.
COMMISSIONER OF TRADE TAX, U.P.
(Civil Appeal No. 3773 of 2011 Etc.)
OCTOBER 09, 2023
[S. RAVINDRA BHAT AND ARAVIND KUMAR, JJ.]
HEADNOTES
Issue for consideration: Whether “tinted glass sheets” manufactured 
by the assessee is liable to be taxed as “goods or wares made of glass” 
under the Notifi cation No.5784 dated 07.09.1981 being Entry No.IV or as 
unclassifi ed item.
UP Trade Tax Act, 1948 – s. 3A – Tinted glass sheets manufactured 
by the assessee – Levy of tax:
Held: Tinted glass sheet during the process of manufacture undergoes 
a change and is diff erent from a plain glass sheet, thus, exigible to tax as 
‘all goods and wares made of glass’ under Entry No. IV of the notifi cation 
and attract a duty @15 % – Exclusion of plain glass panes, optical lens 
would fall within the residuary clause attracting 10 % tax – There is no 
vagueness in the notifi cation dated 07.09.1981 and the entry No. IV is clear 
and unambiguous – It has brought within the sweep “all goods and wares 
made of glass” exigible to tax but not including “plain glass panes” and 
the exemption being the creation of the statute itself, it has to be construed 
strictly – Earlier the entry was “glassware” alone and the said entry was 
subsequently amended and the intention of the legislature is explicitly clear 
to include in its ambit any goods and wares made of glass – Intention of the 
legislature of using expression “of” would reveal the purpose and the court 
should  presume that the legislature was reasonable – Furthermore, neither 
the dictionary meaning nor the common parlance theory would come to the 
rescue of the assessee – Thus, expression “all the goods and wares made of 
glass” occurring in Notifi cation must be taken to refer to all articles of glass 
[2023] 13 S.C.R. 1095 : 2023 INSC 892
1095
1096 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[2023] 13 S.C.R.
except those specifi cally excluded in the entry itself – Impugned judgment 
does not call for interference. [Para 15, 17, 26, 29-31]
Interpretation of statutes – Fiscal statutes – Interpretation of 
provisions:
Held: Word used in a statute must take its colour from the object it 
seeks to achieve and also by considering the words with which it is associated 
in the context. [Para 17]
Words and Phrases – Word ‘Plain’ and ‘Panes’ – Meaning of. 
[Para 23]
LIST OF CITATIONS AND OTHER REFERENCES
Gujarat Steel Tubes Ltd. v. State of Kerala (1989) 3 SCC 127 : [1989] 
3 SCR 210; Maqsood Mohammad v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another 
(1978) 41 STC 324 – distinguished.
Mauri Yeast India Private Limited v. State of U.P. (2008) SCC 680; 
Geep Flashlight Industries Ltd. v. Union of India and Others (2002) 9 SCC 
545; State of Jharkhand and Others v. LA Opala RG Limited (2014) 15 SCC 
136 : [2014] 14 SCR 306; Commissioner of Sales Tax, Madhya Pradesh 
v. Triveni Sheet Glass Limited and Others (1990) 76 STC 308 (FB)=1989 
SCC online MP 346; Atul Glass industries (Pvt.) Ltd v. Collector of Central 
Excise (1986) 3 SCC 480 : [1986] 3 SCR 126; Ramavatar Budhaiprasad 
Etc. v. Assistant Sales Tax Offi  cer (1962) 1 SCR 279; M/s. Indo International 
Industries v. Commissioner of Sales Tax, Uttar Pradesh (1981) 2 SCC 528: 
[1981] 3 SCR 294; Brindavan Bangle Stores and Ors vs Asstt. Commissioner 
of Commercial Taxes and Another (2000) 1 SCC 674 : [2000] 1 SCR 97; 
Commissioner of Sales Tax. Delhi Administration Vikas Bhawan, New Delhi 
v. Baluja Glass Company 1979 SCC Online Del 300 : (1980) 46 STC 17; 
Commissioner of Sales Tax v. Mohd. Ayub & Sons 1981 SCC Online All 971 : 
(1982) 50 STC 187; HPL Chemicals Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, 
Chandigarh (1997) 2 SCC 677; U.P. Glass Works Ltd. v. Commissioner 
Sales Tax. UP, Lucknow. 1973 SCC Online All 422 : (1973) 32 STC 252 : 
1973 Tax LR 2589; Commissioner Sales Tax, U.P. Lucknow v. Banaras Bead 
Manufacturing Co., Varanasi 1968 SCC Online All 380 : (1970) 25 STC 
100; Jalal Plastic Industries and Ors. v. Union of India And Ors. 1981 (8) 
1097
M/S TRIVENI GLASS LIMITED REP. BY ITS DEPUTY 
GENERAL MANAGER (SALES AND P.R.) SHRI R.K. SINHA v. 
COMMISSIONER OF TRADE TAX, U.P.
ELT 653; Commissioner of Sales Tax v. Dawoodbhoy M. Tayabally (1975) 
36 STC 291; Nirlex Spares (P) Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise 
(2008) 2 SCC 628 : [2008] 1 SCR 117; State of Uttar Pradesh & Others v. 
Aryaverth Chawal Udyog & Others (2015) 17 SCC 324; Commissioner of 
Customs (Im

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.