LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

M/S. TATA IRON AND STEEL CO. LTD. versus STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ORS.

Citation: [2005] 2 S.C.R. 1207 · Decided: 30-03-2005 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: B.P. SINGH · Disposal: Dismissed

Cited by 1 judgment(s) · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

,... 
f 
M/S. TAT A IRON AND STEEL CO. LTD. 
A 
v. 
ST A TE OF JHARKHAND AND ORS. 
MARCH 30, 2005 
[B.P. SINGH AND S.B. SINHA, JJ.] 
B 
Bihar Finance Act, 1981 : 
ss. 22, 23 and 13(/){b)-Jharkhand Industrial Policy 2001-Notification 
Nos. 65, 66 and 67 dated 12. 1. 2002-Interpretation of-Facilities of set off C 
and adjustment on intra-State sales, inter-State sales and concessional rate of 
sales tax on purchase of raw material-Assessee producing steel through Hot 
Rolled Mill and Cold Rolling Mill-Claiming exemption under Notifications 
dated 12.1.2002-Held, since both Hot Rolled Mill and Cold Rolling Mill are 
existing units, one of them having received the benefits under a different D 
policy, assessee not entitled to any further relief in terms of the Notification 
Nos. 65, 66 and 67 dated 12.1.2002-Bihar industrial Policy 1991-Notification 
Nos. 478 and 479 dated 22. 12.1995-lnterpretation of Statutes-Administrative 
Law-Promissory estoppel-Applicability of 
Assessee-appellant, a manufacturer of steel through its Hot Rolled E 
Mill (HRM) was granted an industrial licence for expansion of its existing 
industrial unit located in the State of Bihar, which after creation of State 
of Jharkhand came thereunder. Under the Industrial Policy, 1995 of the 
Government of Bihar, two Notification Nos. 478 and 479 dated 22.12.1995 
were issued granting exmption to dealers in respect of tax on purchase of 
sale of certain goods manufactured by new/expanded/diversified/ F 
modernized units. The assessee, pursuant to the Notifications, undertook 
diversification of its product, namely, saleable steel, by establishing a Cold 
Rolling Mill (CRM). On creation of State of Jharkhand and extension of 
the 1981 Act to the said State, the assessee claimed benefit of the 
Notification Nos. 478 and 479 dated 22.12.1995. Assessee's claim was 
ultimately allowed by the Supreme Court*. Meanwhile State of Jharkhand 
declared its Industrial Policy 2001 and issued Notification Nos. 65, 66 and 
67 dated 12.1.2002 granting facilities of set off and adjustment on intra-
state sales, inter-state sales and providing for concessional rate of sales 
tax on purchase of raw material, to dealers in respect of new industrial 
G 
1207 
H 
1208 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[2005] 2 S.C.R. 
A units as well as the existing units. 
The assessee, as regards its existing unit, namely, HRM applied for 
eligibility certificate, which was rejected, and ultimately the High Court 
held that the assessee as a whole, including its diversification into CRP, 
was one existing unit, but as the litigation in relation to CRP was pending 
B before the Supreme Court, the matter was remitted granting leave to the 
assessee to make a fresh claim under industrial Policy, 2001 on the premise 
that if it was found not entitled to the benefit of 1995 Policy in respect of 
CRP, it would be able to claim the benefit under the 2001 Policy of State 
of Jharkhand. Aggrieved, the assessee filed the present appeals. 
c 
Dismissing the appeals, _the Court 
HELD: 1.1. The appellant started its cold rolled mill in terms of a 
fresh industrial licence. It was granted a new industrial licence by the 
Ministry of Industry of the Central Government on or about 9.11.1998 
for manufacture of cold rolled/galvanized/coated/corrugated/painted/ 
D varnished steel sheets/strips/coils in the integrated steel plant. It, in view 
of the judgment of this Court, * became entitled to the benefit of set off 
and/or adjustment from the tax paid on purchase of raw materials in terms 
of Bihar Industrial Policy which was in force for 5 years from September 
1, 1995. As both Hot Rolled Mill and the Cold Rolled Mill are existing 
E 
units, and one of them having received the benefits under a different policy, 
the appellant is not entitled to any further relief in terms of the 
notifications dated 12th January, 2002 .. (1223-E-G; 1232-B-CI 
*Mis. Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. v. State of Jharkhand and Ors., (2004) 
7 242; referred to. 
F 
t.i. The Government of Jharkhand has declared its Industrial Policy 
on or about 25.8.2001, the effective date therefor being 15th November, 
2000. Th.e said Policy was put in force from 15th November, 2000. The 
Appellant's cold rolled mill as also hot rolled mill, thus, are existing units 
within the meaning of the Jharkhand State Policy, in terms whereof if a 
G 
benefit is granted under one policy, no other benefit would be available. 
(1223-G-H; 1224-AI 
2.1. Despite .the fact 

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.