LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

M/S PRAGATI SILICONS PVT. LTD. versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI

Citation: [2007] 5 S.C.R. 654 · Decided: 26-04-2007 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: ASHOK BHAN · Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

MIS PRAGA TI SILICONS PVT. LTD. 
!' 
A 
v. 
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI 
APRIL 26, 2007 
B 
[ASHOK BHAN AND DAL VEER BHANDARI, JJ.] 
Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 
t 
Headings 87.08 and 87.14-Parts and accessories of motor vehicles-
c Plastic name plates-Held-They added to convenient use of motor vehicle 
and served useful purpose of giving an identity to them-They were covered 
by broader term 'accessory'. 
Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System (HSN)-
Explanatory Notes-Note 2(b) to Section XVII, with Chapter 87 as part-
D Scope of-Exclusion from definition of parts and accessories of ' ... similar 
goods of plastics (Chapter 39)'-Plastic name plates-Held-As reference 
has been made to Chapter 39, its provisions controlled scope of 'similar 
~ -
goods of plastics: and it would mean goods similarly defined in Chapter 
39-In absence of specific headings in Chapter 39 regarding name plates, 
E they could not be excluded from Chapter 87 and included within a residuary 
provision in Chapter 39. 
Central Excise Act, 1944-Section 35L (b)-Appeal to Supreme Court-
Issue neither raised before nor decided hf Custom, Excise & Gold (Control) 
Appellate Tribunal, though argued before original authority as well as 
F Commissioner of Appeals, and decided by both against assessee-
Consideration by Supreme Court-Held-Though the Court had option to 
remit case to Tribunal, but to avoid unnecessary delay and expense to 
parties, it was appropriate for itself to decide the issue-It was 111ore so as 
the issue had been decided by authorities below. 
G 
Words and phrases-'Accessory'-In context of Headings 39.26, 87.08 
and 87.14 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, and Note 2(b) to Section XVII 
,., -
to Explanatory Notes of Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding 
System (HSN). 
H 
654 
PRAGATI SILICONS PVT. LTD. v. COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI 
655 
\ 
The assessee-appellant is a manufacturer of plastic name plates for A 
motor vehicles. They claimed their classification under headings 87.08 (Parts 
and accessories of the motor vehicles of heading Nos.87.01to87.05] and 87.14 
[Parts and accessories of vehicles of heading Nos.87.11 to 87.13] of Central 
Excise Tariff Act, 1985. This was approved by the respondent, revenue 
department. However, a show cause notice was issued to them to re-classify B 
the name plates under heading 39.26 [Other articles of plastics] of the Act of 
1985. But this notice was dropped and an order-in-original was passed stating 
"' 
that the appropriate classification of the name plates was under Chapter 87 
of the Act of 1985. Subsequently, the Commissioner of Central Excise 
exercising powers under section 35E of the Central Excise Act, 1944 reviewed 
the above order and an appeal was filed before the Commissioner (Appeals), c 
which was allowed, classifying the plastic name plates under heading 39.26 
of the Mt of 1985. Aggrieved by this, the appellant filed an appeal before the 
Custom, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, but it was rejected. Hence 
the present appeal under Section 35L(b) of the Act of 1944. 
Appellant contended that the headings under Chapter 87 of the Act of D 
1985 should gain primacy as they are more specific while the heading under 
- .::,._ 
Chapter 39 of the Act of 1985 is residuary and more general in nature. 
Respondent relied on Note 2(b) to Section XVII of the Explanatory Notes 
in the Harmoni7.ed Commodity Description and Coding System [HSN], which 
E 
stated that 'parts and accessories' did not include parts of general use, as 
defined in Note 2 to Section XV, of base metal (section XV), or similar goods 
of plastics (Chapter 39), and contended that since Note 2 to Section XV, defined 
'parts of general use' as including name plates, sign plates, number plates, 
etc., their plastic equivalents will also get excluded from the scope of Chapter 
'I 
87 of the Act of 1985 and ought to be classified under Chapter 39 thereof. 
F 
Allowing the appeal, the Court 
HELD: 1. Plastic name plates are 'parts and accessories' of motor 
vehicles and since they are not excluded from Section XVII, the appropriate 
classification is under headings 87.08 and 87.14. [Para 32] (668-G] 
G 
.. 
-
,I 
2.1. The Tribunal has only examined whether the name plates can be 
considered "parts' of motor vehicles. It has not at all considered whether these 
name plates can be considered accessories' of motor vehicles. 
[Para 11) (660-8) 
H 
656 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[200

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.