LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

M.S. PATTER versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND OTHERS

Citation: [2025] 9 S.C.R. 895 · Decided: 12-09-2025 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: J.B. PARDIWALA · Disposal: Directions issued

cites 3 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2025] 9 S.C.R. 895 : 2025 INSC 1115
M.S. Patter 
v. 
State of NCT of Delhi and Others
(Civil Appeal No(s). 11796-11797 of 2025)
12 September 2025
[J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan,* JJ.]
Issue for Consideration
Reforms in Beggars’ Homes.
Headnotes†
Reforms in Beggars’ Homes – Constitution of India – Art.21 – 
Right to dignity, health, shelter, privacy and humane treatment – 
Present case arose out of a grave and unfortunate incident 
at the Beggars’ Home, Lampur (Narela), New Delhi where 
contamination of the drinking and cooking water with coliform 
bacteria resulted in an outbreak of cholera and gastroenteritis 
among the inmates leading to multiple deaths and widespread 
illness, exposing serious lapses in sanitation, hygiene, and 
healthcare facilities within the institution – Appellant filed PIL, 
disposed of by High Court vide order dtd.15.10.2001 directing 
the respondents inter alia to complete the measures for making 
the Homes more habitable, in line with the recommendations of 
the fact-finding committee – Appellant filed application seeking 
implementation thereof – High Court without going into the 
merits or passing a reasoned order, merely disposed of the 
application, granting liberty to the appellant to approach the 
appropriate forum if still aggrieved – Challenge to:
Held: 1.1 Since the inception of the present proceedings, series of 
directions were issued from time to time for improving the conditions 
prevailing in Beggars’ Homes – Directions by and large complied 
by the concerned authorities, resulting in tangible improvement 
in infrastructure, health facilities, diet, sanitation, and the overall 
living conditions of the inmates – Thus, respondents have duly 
complied with the order of the High Court dtd.15.10.2001 in its 
entirety. [Paras 22, 22.18]
* Author
896
[2025] 9 S.C.R.
Supreme Court Reports
1.2 States and Union Territories need to institutionalise similar reforms 
in Beggars’ Homes and analogous institutions under their control, so 
that the constitutional guarantee of life with dignity is meaningfully 
secured for this most vulnerable section of society. [Para 23]
1.3 Comprehensive directions issued in respect of all Beggars’ 
Homes across the country including the subject institutions, w.r.t 
Preventive Healthcare and Sanitation; Infrastructure and capacity; 
Nutrition and Food Safety; Vocational Training and Rehabilitation; 
Legal Aid and Awareness; Child and Gender Sensitivity; 
Accountability and Oversight; Implementation and Compliance – 
Directions to be implemented within six months from the date of 
this judgment – Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment to 
frame and notify model guidelines, within three months, to facilitate 
uniform implementation of the aforesaid directions across all States 
and Union Territories – Copy of this judgment to be circulated to 
the Chief Secretaries of all States and Union Territories, Secretary, 
Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, Government of India, 
for strict compliance – Social justice – Directions by Supreme 
Court. [Paras 23, 23.1, 23.2]
Constitution of India – Art.21 – Directive Principles of State 
Policy – Arts.38, 39(e), 41, 47 – State’s duty towards indigent 
persons, affirmative and non-derogable – Need for judicial 
intervention, why – Failure to ensure humane conditions in 
beggars’ homes is a constitutional breach of the fundamental 
right to life with dignity, thereby inviting judicial intervention – 
Treatment of the indigent persons historically vis-à-vis Indian 
Constitutional framework post 1950 – Role of Beggars’ 
Homes – Social justice. [Paras 16-16.7]
Bombay Prevention of Begging Act, 1959, as extended to the 
National Capital Territory of Delhi – Scope, ambit and purpose. 
[Paras 17, 17.3-17.5]
Case Law Cited
State of Uttar Pradesh v. Brahm Datt Sharma and Another [1987] 2 
SCR 444 : (1987) 2 SCC 179; Francis Coralie Mullin v. Administrator, 
Union Territory of Delhi [1981] 2 SCR 516 : (1981) 1 SCC 608; 
Inhuman Conditions in 1382 Prisons, In Re [2016] 1 SCR 1090 : 
(2016) 3 SCC 700 – referred to.
Harsh Mander v. Union of India, AIR 2018 Del 188 – referred to.
[2025] 9 S.C.R. 
897
M.S. Patter v. State of NCT of Delhi and Others
List of Acts
Bombay Prevention of Begging Act, 1959; Andhra Pradesh 
Prevention of Begging Act, 1977; Assam Prevention of Begging Act, 
1964; The Bihar Prevention of Beggary Act, 1951; The Goa, Daman 
and Diu Prevention of Begging Act, 1972; The Madhya Pradesh 
Biksha Vritti 

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.