M.S. PATTER versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND OTHERS
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
[2025] 9 S.C.R. 895 : 2025 INSC 1115 M.S. Patter v. State of NCT of Delhi and Others (Civil Appeal No(s). 11796-11797 of 2025) 12 September 2025 [J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan,* JJ.] Issue for Consideration Reforms in Beggars’ Homes. Headnotes† Reforms in Beggars’ Homes – Constitution of India – Art.21 – Right to dignity, health, shelter, privacy and humane treatment – Present case arose out of a grave and unfortunate incident at the Beggars’ Home, Lampur (Narela), New Delhi where contamination of the drinking and cooking water with coliform bacteria resulted in an outbreak of cholera and gastroenteritis among the inmates leading to multiple deaths and widespread illness, exposing serious lapses in sanitation, hygiene, and healthcare facilities within the institution – Appellant filed PIL, disposed of by High Court vide order dtd.15.10.2001 directing the respondents inter alia to complete the measures for making the Homes more habitable, in line with the recommendations of the fact-finding committee – Appellant filed application seeking implementation thereof – High Court without going into the merits or passing a reasoned order, merely disposed of the application, granting liberty to the appellant to approach the appropriate forum if still aggrieved – Challenge to: Held: 1.1 Since the inception of the present proceedings, series of directions were issued from time to time for improving the conditions prevailing in Beggars’ Homes – Directions by and large complied by the concerned authorities, resulting in tangible improvement in infrastructure, health facilities, diet, sanitation, and the overall living conditions of the inmates – Thus, respondents have duly complied with the order of the High Court dtd.15.10.2001 in its entirety. [Paras 22, 22.18] * Author 896 [2025] 9 S.C.R. Supreme Court Reports 1.2 States and Union Territories need to institutionalise similar reforms in Beggars’ Homes and analogous institutions under their control, so that the constitutional guarantee of life with dignity is meaningfully secured for this most vulnerable section of society. [Para 23] 1.3 Comprehensive directions issued in respect of all Beggars’ Homes across the country including the subject institutions, w.r.t Preventive Healthcare and Sanitation; Infrastructure and capacity; Nutrition and Food Safety; Vocational Training and Rehabilitation; Legal Aid and Awareness; Child and Gender Sensitivity; Accountability and Oversight; Implementation and Compliance – Directions to be implemented within six months from the date of this judgment – Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment to frame and notify model guidelines, within three months, to facilitate uniform implementation of the aforesaid directions across all States and Union Territories – Copy of this judgment to be circulated to the Chief Secretaries of all States and Union Territories, Secretary, Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, Government of India, for strict compliance – Social justice – Directions by Supreme Court. [Paras 23, 23.1, 23.2] Constitution of India – Art.21 – Directive Principles of State Policy – Arts.38, 39(e), 41, 47 – State’s duty towards indigent persons, affirmative and non-derogable – Need for judicial intervention, why – Failure to ensure humane conditions in beggars’ homes is a constitutional breach of the fundamental right to life with dignity, thereby inviting judicial intervention – Treatment of the indigent persons historically vis-à-vis Indian Constitutional framework post 1950 – Role of Beggars’ Homes – Social justice. [Paras 16-16.7] Bombay Prevention of Begging Act, 1959, as extended to the National Capital Territory of Delhi – Scope, ambit and purpose. [Paras 17, 17.3-17.5] Case Law Cited State of Uttar Pradesh v. Brahm Datt Sharma and Another [1987] 2 SCR 444 : (1987) 2 SCC 179; Francis Coralie Mullin v. Administrator, Union Territory of Delhi [1981] 2 SCR 516 : (1981) 1 SCC 608; Inhuman Conditions in 1382 Prisons, In Re [2016] 1 SCR 1090 : (2016) 3 SCC 700 – referred to. Harsh Mander v. Union of India, AIR 2018 Del 188 – referred to. [2025] 9 S.C.R. 897 M.S. Patter v. State of NCT of Delhi and Others List of Acts Bombay Prevention of Begging Act, 1959; Andhra Pradesh Prevention of Begging Act, 1977; Assam Prevention of Begging Act, 1964; The Bihar Prevention of Beggary Act, 1951; The Goa, Daman and Diu Prevention of Begging Act, 1972; The Madhya Pradesh Biksha Vritti
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex