LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

M/S . MANGALORE GANESH BEDI WORKS versus THE STATE OF MYSORE & ANOTHER

Citation: [1963] SUPP. 1 S.C.R. 275 · Decided: 25-09-1962 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: S.K. DAS · Disposal: Dismissed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

' 
1 S.C.R. 
SUPREME COURT RF PORTS 
275 
The appeal must therefore be allowed and the 
petition filed by the respondent dismissed. There 
will ho "" ""'" " '° oorogbo"'~ ppool ,.,,,,,.,, 
M/s .. MANGALORE GANESH BEDI WORKS 
v. 
THE STATE OF MYSORE & ANOTHER 
(S. K. 
DAS, J. L. 
KAPUR, 
A. K. 
SARKAR, 
1f. HrnAYATULLAH and RAGHUBAll DAYAL, .JJ.) 
lnrlian Coinage-Enactment le?Jying tax in terms of naya 
paisa., if a taJ:ing measnrc-Constitntional ?Jalidity-Amendment 
-Effect-Indian Coinage Act, (Act. 3 of 1906), as amended by 
Indian coinage (Amendment) Act, (31 of 1955), s. 14-0onsti-
lntion of India, Arts. 255, 197, 198, 199, 202. 
The appellant was a registered firm under the Mysore 
Sales Tax Act on which was imposed a tax of Rs. 1,16,728.44 
Nps at the rate cf .02 Nps per rupee on a return of over Rs.58, 
36,422·26 Nps. 
Its grievance was that according to Mysore 
Sales Tax Act, it was liable to Sales Tax at the rate of 3 pies 
for every rupee but after the amendment of Indian Coinage Act 
(Act 30 of 1906) by amending Act 31 of 1955, tax was levied 
at the rate of .02 Nps per rupee, which made him liable to pay 
more than 'vhat he \VOtild have paid if charged at the rate of 
3 pies per rnpee. 
It was contended that such enhancen1ent of 
tax \Vas unconstitutional and illegal being in contravention of 
Article 255 0f the Constitution. Objection• by the appellant 
regarding the validity of tax were (1) that by the substitution 
of 2 naya paisas in place of 3 pies, a change '\vas brought in the 
tax exigihle by the Mysore Sales Tax Act and since this enact-
ment enhancing the tax was eot enacted according to procedure 
for money hills not being in accordance with Articles 193, 199 
and 207 of the constitution, the tax \Vas illegal and invalid; 
(2) that the Indian coinage 
~'\cti being a central i\ct dealing 
,vith "coinage and legal tender" under item 3G of 
I~ist I, 
could not change the rate of tax under the Mysore Sales Tax 
Act. 
1962 
Union Territory D.f 
Tri/mra, Agtirtala 
v. 
Gopal Chanikr 
Dutta Choudhury 
Shah, J. 
1962 
Septemb<r 25. 
1962 
M/s. Mangalore 
.CantJh Bedi Works 
v. 
The State of Mysore 
Kapur, 
276 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1963] SUPP. 
Held, that by substitution of new coinage, no enhance-
ment of tax was enacted but was mere Iv a sbustitution of one 
coinage by another of equivalent value Und even assuming that 
it was a taxing measure, its validity could not be challenged on 
the ground that it offends Arts. 197 to 199 and the procedure 
laid down in Art. 202 of the Comtitution, because of Art. 212 
which prohibits the validity of any proceedings in a Je~islature 
from being called in question for irregularity of procedure and 
formalities of .'\rt. 255 a re only matters of procedure. 
Held, further, that if the Indian Coinage Act had not 
the effect of changing 3 pies into .02 Nps in the rate of tax 
leviable under the Mysore Sales Tax Act, the Mysore Existing 
Laws (Constrnction of References to Values) Act, 1957, had 
made a provision for charging the tax in terms of naya paisas 
instead of pies, therefore, the levy of tax in terms of naya paisas 
was not unconstitutional, nor \Vas it a taxing measure, but 
dealt mere I~. with the canversion of the old coinage into new 
coinage. 
CIVJL.APPELLATE JuRISDICTTON : Civil Appeal 
No. 194 of 1962. 
Appeal by special leave from the order dated 
July 15, 1960, of the Mysore High Court in Writ 
Petition No. 719 of 19fi0. 
N. C. Chatterjee and S. S. Shukln, for the 
appellant. 
N. S. Bindra. and P. D. .Menon, for the 
respond en ts. 
1962. September 25. 
The Judgment of the 
Court was delivered by 
KAPUR, J.-This is an appeal by special leave 
against the judgment and order of the High Court of 
Mysore dismissing the assessee's petition under Art. 
226 of the Constitution for quashing the order of 
assessment relating to two quarters i. e. from April 
], 1957 to September 30, 1957, under the Mysore 
Sales Tax Act, Act VI of 1948. 
The appellant is a firm registered under the 
Mysore Sales Tax Act and was assessed to sales tax 
I 
.. 
1 S.C.R. SUPREl\IE COURT REPORTS 
277 
on a return of over Rs. ii8,:ln,422.:W Nps and the tax 
imposed on lhat sum at .112 Nps per rupee was 
Rs. I,rn, 728.44 Nps. 
The grievance of the appellant 
was that according to the Mysore Saks Tax Act he 
was liable to sales tax at the rate of :: pies for every 
rupee on the turnover and calculated on that basis 
the amount of tax would be Rs. 91,ti!JO/- but after 
the amendment

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.