LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

M/S. LISIE MEDICAL INSTITUTIONS versus THE STATE OF KERALA & ORS.

Citation: [2017] 4 S.C.R. 43 · Decided: 09-05-2017 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: A.K. SIKRI · Disposal: Matter referred to larger bench

cites 1 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2017] 4 S.C.R. 43 
M/S. LISIE MEDICAL INSTITUTIONS 
v. 
THE STATE OF KERALA & ORS. 
(Civil Appeal No. 6799 of 2017) 
MAY09,2017 
[A. K. SIKRI ;\ND ASHOK BHUSHAN, JJ.] 
Kera/a Building Tax Act, 197~: 
s. 3(1) Explanation 1 - interpretation of - Property of the 
appellant assessed to building tax - Challenged - Single Judge as 
well as Division Bench of High Court relying .on S. H. Medical 
Centre Hospital case held that the hospital is not liable to be 
exempted from the tax - On appeal, held: S. H. Medical Centre 
Hospital case has wrongly interpreted Explanation I to s. 3(1) in 
not noticing that it contains the word "includes" and not "means" 
- Matter is therefore referred to Larger Bench. 
Referring the matter to Larger Bench, the Court 
> 
> 
> 
HELD: In *S. H. Medical Ce11tre Hospital case an error in 
interpreting Explanation I to Clause 1 of Section 3 of the Kerala 
Building Tax Act, 1975 has occurred in not noticing tha{ it contains 
the word "includes" and not "means". This error led to holding 
that 'charitable purpose' meant only 'relief of the poor and free 
medical relief'. Relief to the poor and free medical relief is only 
one of the facets of charitable purpose and Explanation simply 
clarifies that too be a charitable purpose. However, the inclusive 
definition points out that relief to poor and free medical relief is 
not exhaustive as to what charitable purpose'would mean. Thus, 
in order to find out the true scope of charitable purpose, one will 
have to look into the judgments of this Court, even if this very 
expression is examined in the context of the Income Tax Act. 
The Court disagrees with the opinion of the Division Bench in 
S.IL Medical Celltre Hospital case. [Paras 14 and 15) [51-C-F] 
*S.H. Medical Centre Hospital v. State of Kera/a (2014) 
11 sec 381 - disagreed. 
Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Gujarat v. Surat 
A 
B 
c 
D 
E 
F 
G 
Art Silk Cloth Manufactures Association, Surat (1980) 
H 
43 
44 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[2017]4 S.C.R. 
A 
2 SCC 31: [1980.J 2 SCR 77; Queens Educational 
Society v. CIT (2015) 8 SCC 47 : [2015] 3 StR 838 -
referred to. 
B 
c 
(2014) 11 sec 381 
[1980] 2 SCR 77 
J20f5J 3 SCR 838 
Case Law Reference 
disagreed 
referred to 
· referred to 
Para5 
Para 10 
Para 10 
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION:. Civil Appeal No. 6799 
of2017. 
From the Judgment and Order dated 18.07.2016 of the High Com1 
ofKerala at Ernakulam in W. A. No. 1386 of2016. 
F. S. Nariman, Sr. Adv, Isaal M. Perumpillil, M. T. George, Jijo 
Paul Kallookk Karan, Advs. for the Appellant. 
D 
V. Giri, Sr. Adv., C. K. Sasi, Manukrishnan G., Advs. for the 
Respondents. 
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by 
A. K. SIKRI, J. 1. This appeal is preferred against the order 
_dated 18.07.2016 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court in 
E 
Writ Appeal No. 1386 of2016 which was filed by the appellant herein 
challenging the order of the learned single Judge whereby the writ petition 
of the petitioner has been dismissed. We may mention at the outset that 
the appellant (M/s. Lisie Medical Institutions) is claiming itself to be a 
charitable institution and is, thus, seeks exemption from liability of paying 
F 
building tax underthe Kerala Building Tax Act, 1975 (for short the' Act') 
G 
H 
.. in respect of its building in Ernakulam, Kerala where it runs the hospital. 
2. A brief description of background facts would suffice, which is 
as follows: 
· 
The appellant 'Mis. Usie Medical Institutions' was constituted 
under a Registered Trust Deed, executed on 03.04.1990 by the 
Archdiocese ofEmakulam, appointing Rev. Msgr. Parackel as the trustee 
of the Trust. The appellant-trust is only an instrumentality of its settler, 
the Church. His ExceHency Mar Sebastian Adayantharath (Chairman), 
Auxiliruy Bishop ofErnakulam -Angamaly Archdiocese, His Excellency 
Mar Jose Puthenveettil Auxiliary Bishop of·Ernakulam - Angamaly 
M/S; USIE MEDICAL INSTITUTIONS v. THE STATE OF 
KERALA & ORS. [A. K. SIKRI, J.] 
45 
( 
Archdiocese, Msgr. Sebastian Vadakkumpadan, Syncellus of the 
A 
Ernakulam - Angamaly Archdiocese, Rev. Fr. Thomas Vaikathuparambil, 
Direptor (Chief Executive Trustee), Rev. Fr. Babu. Kalathil, (Asst. 
Executive Trustee), Rev. Fr. Varghese Palatty, (Asst. Executive Trustee), 
Rev. Fr. Joshy Puthuva, (Finance Manager),_ Rev. Fr. Sebastian 
Kalapurackal, (Director), Sr. Thelma MSJ (Member), Adv. Bobby ' B 
Vallamattam (Member), Dr. Babu Palatty (Member), Fr. Anto Chalissery 
(Asst. Executiv

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.