M/S. K.C.P. LTD. versus GOVERNMENT OF A.P. & ORS.
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
A B [2015] 10S.C.R. 70 M/S. K.C.P. LTD. v. GOVERNMENT OF A.P. & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 5020 of 2005) AUGUST 12, 2015 [VIKRAMAJIT SEN AND SHIVA KIRTI SINGH, JJ.] Andhra Pradesh Rectified Spirits Rules, 1971 - rr.4, C 13, 15- Rules (pertaining to rectified spirit (industrial grade) - Constitutional validity of - Requirement of obtaining a licence and payment of excise duty and pass fee for export of rectified spirit - Challenge to - Held: While State Governments are not competent to impose taxes/levies on D industrial alcohol, fee charged for services rendered to prevent the diversion and conversion of industrial alcohol for human consumption is permissible and legal - Such fee need not be charged strictly on quid pro quo basis and It will pass legal muster so long as it is not excessive - Thus, 1971 E Rules themselves are not illegal- They are within the purview of the constitutional powers of the State Government- r. 4 on the administrative fee are essential to defray expenses incurred by State Governments to prevent the illegal conversion of industrial alcohol to potable alcohol - However, F r 15 dealing with the export of rectified spirit is struck down, since it imposes a tax, not a fee, on appellants and is outside the State's legislative competence - The purpose is not to prevent industrial alcohol from being diverted and converted to potable alcohol; their purpose is to regulate, control and G discourage the export of industrial alcohol - It has not been conclusively shown by State that it has been constrained to monitor or superintend that industrial alcohol is not illegally diverted to other uses within the State - If industrial alcohol H is exported outside the State as industrial alcohol, these 70 M/S. K.C.P. LTD. v. GOVERNMENTOFA.P. &ORS. 71 impositions partake of a totally different character; transfening A it into a tax. Synthetics & Chemicals Limited vs. State of U.P. 1989 (1) Suppl. scR 623: (1990) 1 sec 109 - referred to. Case Law Reference 1989 (1) Suppl. SCR 623 referred to. Para4 B CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. C 5020 of2005 From the Judgment and Order dated 25. 04.2002 of the High Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in · Writ Petition No. 10874of1996 WITH C. A. Nos. 5021-5022 of 2005 Sanjay Parikh, Challa Guna Ranjan, Y. Rajagopala Rao, D Y. Vismai Rao, Hitender Nath Ratnam, Y. Raja Gopala Rao for E the Appellant. Prerna Singh, Guntur Prabhakar for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by F VIKRAMAJIT SEN, J. 1. The Appellants before us assail the impugned Judgment of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh, which had upheld the legality of Andhra Pradesh Rectified Spirits Rules, 1971 (1971 Rules for brevity) and had G found the requirement of obtaining a licence and the payment of Excise duty and Pass fee for exporting rectified spirit to be legal. 2. The Appellants have distilleries which produce various grades of industrial alcohol from molasses, also known as ethyl H 72 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2015] 10 S.C.R. A alcohol or ethanol. In exercise of powers conferred under Section 72 of the Andhra Pradesh Excise Act, 1968, the Respondent State enacted the 1971 Rules. Rules 4, 13 and 15 are laid out herein for the facility of reference; although in B c D E F G H these Appeals it is Rule 15 which is in focus-. Rule 4: Rectified spirit shall not be issued from a distillery or a warehouse without pre-payment of ·administrative fee meant for industrial purposes. In case of potable purposes, rectified spirit shall not be issued from a distillery or a warehouse without pre-payment of Excise Duty except when rectified spirit is moved in bound or when payment of Excise Duty has been exempted. Rule 13: (1) No person shall be granted license for possession and use of rectified spirit for industrial purposes unless the applicant: (a) deposits as security for the fulfillment of all the conditions of his license such sum as may be fixed by the Government from time to time which shall not be less than Rs. 15,000 in cash in the Government treasury; and (b) executes an agreement in Form R.S.-Vforpayment of the costs, charges and expenses including salaries and allowances of such· Excise staff as may be determined by the Commissioner or his nominee to be posted at the manufactory of the licensee in connection with the supervision to ensure compliance with the provisi
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex