M/S INTEL DESIGN SYSTEMS (INDIA) P. LTD. versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS & CENTRAL EXCISE
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
~
[2008] 2 S.C.R. 686
A
MIS INTEL DESIGN SYSTEMS (INDIA) P. LTD.
, ..
v.
y---
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS & CENTRAL EXCISE
(Civil Appeal No. 4564 of 2002)
8
FEBRUARY 11, 2008
[DR. ARIJIT PASAYAT AND
LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA, JJ.]
t
Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985:
c
Sub-Heading 8536. 90 -
Contractors; switches and
control box - Classification of - Held: The goo(js in question
'•
are used for switching, protecting electric circuits or for making
connections to or in electric circuit - Hence, classifiable under
Sub-Heading 8536. 90 by virtue of Note 2(f) to Section XVII -
' ..
D CBEC circular No. 17190-CEX IV dated 9. 7. 1990 relied upon
by assessee not relevant - Interpretative Rules - Rule 1.
,l
The assessee-appellant was engaged in the
manufacture of goods such as contractors, switches and
..
E · control box. It sought classification of these goods under
Ch aper Heading 8710 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985
on the ground that these goods were manufactured solely
and principally for fitting into the tanks and armoured
~
fighting vehicles of the Defence Department. In support
of their contention, they relied upon Circular No. 17/90 CE
I
F XIV dated 9.7.1990.
•
~
Adjudicating Authority relied upon Note 2 (f) to
Section XVII and held that goods in question are parts of
electrical equipments falling under Chapter Sub heading
G 8536.90 and the CBEC Circular was not relevant.
Accordingly Adjudicating Authority classified the goods
under Chapter Sub-heading 8536.90 and confirmed the
~
demand. CEGAT dismissed the appeal of assessee.
Hence the present appeal.
H
686
·"{.
M/S INTEL DESIGN SYSTEMS (I) P. LTD. v. COMMNR.
687
OF CUSTOMS & CENTRAL EXCISE
..
Dismissing the appeal, the Court
A
- "i
HELD : 1. As per Rule 1 on Interpretative Rules,
classification of excisable goods is to be determined
according to the terms of the Heading and in terms of
Section/Chapter notes. Note 2 (f) to Section XVII (~hich
B
governs Chapter 87) excludes the goods viz. electrical
machinery and equipment (Chapter 85). The goods in
t
question i.e. contractors, switches, control box etc. are
the goods used for switching, protecting electrical circuits
or for making connections to or in electric circuit; These
parts/components are specifically covered under CSH C'
8536.90. The CBEC Circular relied upon by the assessee
is not relevant. [Para 4] [690-C, D]
2. As per the Explanatory Notes to HSN, the parts
falling under Chapter Heading 8710 would be ·covered D.
under the said chapter, provided they fulfill both the
A
conditions i.e. they must be identifiable as being suitable
for use solely or principally for such vehides and that they
must not be excluded by the provisions of Notes to
Section XVII. The identifiable parts under the said heading,
E
bodies of armoured vehicles and parts thereof, cover
special road wheels for armoured cars, propulsion wheels
for tanks, tracts etc. As per this requirement, the goods
should not only be identifiable to be armoured vehicles,
but it should also. not have been excluded by Notes to
Section XVII. The Chapter note 2(f) excludes electrical
F
....
machinery and equipment falling under Chapter 85.
Explanatory Notes to HSN relating to the parts and
accessories excluded by Note 2 specify items with
reference to specific Chapter Heading as per (7)(a), (k)
which excludes photographs and other current collectors G.
for electric traction vehicles, fuses, switches and other
electric apparatus of Heading No.85.35 or 85.36. The items,
therefore, manufactured by the appellants are identifiable
or are in the nature of goods falling under Chapter Heading
•
85.36. Since these fall under the category of excluded
H
688
SUPREME COURT REPORTS
[2008] 2 S.C.R.
A
goods under Chapter Notes, even though they are used
specifically solely or principally with the armoured
vehicles of Chapter Heading 8710, they are classifiable
under. Chapter Heading 8536.90 only as held by the
B
adjudicating authority. [Para 5] [690-E-H; 691-A, BJ
CIVILAPPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 4564
of 2002.
From the final Judgment and Order No. C-1/1270/WZB/
02 dated 10.05.2002 passed by the Central Excise & Gold
c (Control) Appellate Tribunal, West Regional Bench at Mumbai
in Appeal No. E/829/2000-Mum.
D
Ramesh Singh, Pratap Venugopal, Jhuma Bose, Harshad
V. Hameed and Dileep P. (for Mis. K.J. John & Co.) for the
Appellant.
P. Vishwanatha Shetty, Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex