LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

M/S ENGINEER BUILDER & ASSOCIATES versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Citation: [2014] 1 S.C.R. 977 · Decided: 10-02-2014 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: A.K. PATNAIK · Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2014] 1 S.C.R. 977 
MIS ENGINEER BUILDER & ASSOCIATES 
v. 
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 
(Civil Appeal Nos. 1932-1934 of 2014) 
FEBRUARY 10, 2014 
[A.K. PATNAIK AND JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, JJ.) 
JAMMU AND KASHMIR ARBITRATION ACT, 1945: 
s.49(2); Fourth schedule - Application for setting aside award 
A 
B 
- Limitation and condonation of delay - Held: s. 49(2) C 
prescribes a limitation of 30 days for filing an application for 
setting aside the award - Under s. 5 of the Jammu and Kashmir 
Limitation Act, period of /imitation can be extended by the 
Court in respect of any application if the Court is satisfied that 
the applicant had sufficient cause for not making the D 
application within the period of limitation - However, s. 5 of the 
Jammu and Kashmir Limitation Act do not apply to any 
application under any special or local law - The Act of 1945 
does not provide anywhere that s.5 of the Jammu and 
Kashmir Limitation Act will apply to an application for setting E 
aside an award u/ss.30 and 33 of the Act of 1945 - Thus, the 
Court has no powers to condone the delay in filing an 
application for setting aside an award u/ss.30 and 33 of the 
Act of 1945 - Jammu and Kashmir Limitation Act - s. 5. 
INTERPRETATION Of: STATUTES: Conflict between F 
the provisions of the Act and provisions of the Schedule of 
the Act - Held: The provisions of the Act will prevail over the 
provisions of the Schedule. 
Dispute arose between the parties and matter was G 
referred to arbitration. The arbitrator passed an award on 
4.9.2007 in favour of the appellant. In December, 2007, the 
appellant filed an execution petition. The respondent then 
filed an arbitration application under Section 34 of the 
977 
H 
978 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[2014] 1 S.C.R. 
A Jammu and Kashmir Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 
1997 before the High Court for setting aside the award. 
The single judge of the High Court dismissed the 
application on the ground that application ought to have 
been filed under the Jammu and Kashmir Arbitration Act 
B of 1945. On appeal, the Division Bench of the High Court 
while upholding the decision of the single judge observed 
that it would be open to the respondent to take steps as 
required under Section 30 and 33 of Act of 1945 in 
relation to the award and if so advised to file an 
C application for condonation of delay. The grievance of 
the appellant in the instant appeals was the observation 
of the High Court regarding filing of application under 
Section 30 and 33 of Act of 1945 along with application 
for condonation of delay. 
D 
Allowing the appeals, the Court 
HELD: 1. Sections 30 and 33 of the Jammu and 
Kashmir Arbitration Act of 1945, which provide for setting 
aside an award on certain grounds, do not prescribe any 
E period of limitation for filing an application for setting 
aside an award, but Section 49(2) read with Fourth 
Schedule of the Act of 1945 prescribes a limitation of 
thirty days from the date of service of the notice of filing 
of the award for filing the application for setting aside an 
F award or to get an award remitted for reconsideration. 
Section 49(2) of the Act of 1945 makes an amendment to 
the First Schedule of the Jammu and Kashmir Limitation 
Act and provides in Article 153 of the First Schedule of 
the said Limitation Act that the period of limitation for filing 
G an application for setting aside the award will be 30 days. 
The principle laid down by this Court in M/s. Aphali 
Pharmaceuticals Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. is 
that in case there is conflict between the provisions of the 
Act and provisions of the Schedule of the Act, the 
provisions of the Act will prevail over the provisions of 
H 
ENGINEER BUILDER & ASSOCIATES v. UNION OF 
979 
INDIA 
the Schedule. As Sections 30 and 33 do not prescribe a 
A 
different period of limitation, there is no conflict between 
Sections 30 and 33 of the Act of 1945 and the Fourth 
Schedule of the Act of 1945. Rather, Sections 30 and 33 
of the Act of 1945, which do not prescribe any period of 
limitation for filing an application for setting aside an 
B 
award will have to be read along with Section 49(2) and 
Fourth Schedule of the said Act and so read, the period 
of limitation prescribed for filing an application for setting 
aside an award is 30 days from the service of notice of 
filing of the award. [Para 7] [983-8-C; 984-B-E] 
c 
2. It is only under Section 5 of the Jammu and 
Kashmir Limitation Act that any time beyond the

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.