LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
βš–οΈ Ask the AI about your situation:πŸš— Car AccidentπŸ’Ό Work / Job🏠 Housing / EvictionπŸ‘ͺ Family / DivorceπŸ“‹ Contract DisputeπŸ’° Money Owed

M/S. COAL INDIA LIMITED versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (PORT), CUSTOMS HOUSE, KOLKATA

Citation: [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1891 · Decided: 01-05-2025 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: ABHAY S. OKA · Disposal: Dismissed

cites 3 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2025] 5 S.C.R. 1891 : 2025 INSC 609
M/s. Coal India Limited 
v. 
Commissioner of Customs (Port),  
Customs House, Kolkata 
(Civil Appeal No. 8028 of 2010)
01 May 2025
[Abhay S. Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan,* JJ.]
Issue for Consideration
Whether the engineering and technical service fees/agency 
commission/charges paid by the appellant and its subsidiaries to 
the local agent of the overseas supplier were includable in the 
assessable value of the imported goods (spare parts) under the 
Customs Act, 1962, as held by all the lower authorities.
Headnotes†
Customs Act, 1962 – s.14(1), (1A) – Customs Valuation 
(Determination of Price of Imported Goods) Rules, 1988 –  
r.9(1)(a) and (e); Note to r.4 – Assessable value of the imported 
goods (spare parts), for the purpose of levy of customs duty – 
Assistant Commissioner of Customs passed order finalizing 
provisional assessment of bills of entry covering goods 
imported by the appellant and its subsidiaries under several 
purchase orders – It held that the engineering and technical 
service fees (8 percent of the Free on Board (FOB) amount) 
paid by the appellant and its subsidiaries to the local agent 
of the overseas supplier, M/s Voltas Limited as reflected in 
the purchase order were includable in the assessable value of 
the imported goods (spare parts) u/r.9(1)(a) and r.9(1)(e), 1988 
Rules r/w s.14(1)(a), 1962 Act – Since the appellant had failed 
to include such service fees/agency commission/charges in 
the assessable value of spare parts so imported resulting in 
short levy of customs duty amounting to Rs.64,47,244.00, the 
appellant was directed to pay the same – Order confirmed 
by Commissioner (Appeals) as also by CESTAT – Challenge 
to – Interference, if warranted:
* Author
1892
[2025] 5 S.C.R.
Supreme Court Reports
Held: No – View taken by all the lower authorities is correct – 
CESTAT carefully analysed the relevant documents and held 
that the services rendered were such that appellant faced no 
inconvenience at the time of importation – Amounts paid to Voltas 
Limited by the appellant were not linked to any services specifically 
rendered by it – Payments were made only in connection with 
the sale of the goods presumably because M/s Voltas Limited 
was an agent of the foreign supplier – Thus, payments made 
to M/s Voltas Limited were only as a condition of sale and not 
for any services rendered – Therefore, it had a direct nexus 
to the value of the goods imported – Services rendered by the 
Indian agent were not post-importation activities – The services 
provided were directly relatable to the import of the goods by 
way of product support service covered by ss.14(1) and 14(1A),  
Customs Act r/w r.9(1)(e), Customs Valuation Rules. [Paras 25.1, 
33, 34]
Customs Act, 1962 – s.14 – Customs Valuation (Determination 
of Price of Imported Goods) Rules, 1988 – Note to r.4; r.12 – 
Plea of the appellant that note to r.4 has statutory force and 
it stipulates that value of imported goods shall not include 
charges for maintenance or technical assistance undertaken 
after importation of imported goods:
Held: This Court in J.K. Corporation Limited adverting to Note to 
r.4 held that what would be excluded for computing the assessable 
value for the purpose of levy of customs duty is any amount paid 
for post-importation activities including any amount paid for post-
importation technical assistance. [Para 31]
Case Law Cited
Commissioner of Customs (Ports), Kolkata v. J.K. Corpn. Ltd. 
[2007] 2 SCR 196 : (2007) 9 SCC 401; Commissioner of 
CustomsΒ v. Ferodo India (P) Ltd. [2008] 3 SCR 147 : (2008) 4 
SCC 563 – relied on.
Collector of Customs (Preventive), Ahmedabad v. Essar Gujarat 
Ltd., Surat [1996] Supp. 8 SCR 757 : (1997) 9 SCC 738; 
Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise 
& Customs, Bhubaneswar [2000] 1 SCR 876 : (2000) 3 SCC 
472 – referred to.
[2025] 5 S.C.R. 
1893
M/s. Coal India Limited v.  
Commissioner of Customs (Port), Customs House, Kolkata
List of Acts
Customs Valuation (Determination of Price of Imported Goods) 
Rules, 1988; Customs Act, 1962; Customs Tariff Act, 1975; General 
Clauses Act, 1897.
List of Keywords
Customs duty; Engineering and technical service fees; Direct nexus 
to the value of the goods imported; Engineering and technical 
service fees includable in the assessable value of imported goods; 
Assessable value of the imported goods (spare parts); Service fees; 
Agency commission; Agency charges in the assessable va

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.