LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

M/S CHITHRA WOODS MANORS WELFARE ASSOCIATION versus SHAJI AUGUSTINE

Citation: [2025] 4 S.C.R. 2707 · Decided: 24-04-2025 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: ABHAY S. OKA · Disposal: Disposed off

cites 2 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2025] 4 S.C.R. 2707 : 2025 INSC 567
M/s Chithra Woods Manors Welfare Association 
v. 
Shaji Augustine
(Contempt Petition (Civil) No. 712 of 2023  
In 
SLP (Civil) No. 17433 of 2021)
24 April 2025
[Abhay S. Oka and Augustine George Masih,* JJ.]
Issue for Consideration
Whether the Respondent-alleged contemnor is guilty of civil 
contempt for non-compliance of the directions issued by this Court 
vide Order dated 07.11.2022.
Headnotes†
Contempt of Court Act, 1971 – s.2(b) – Civil contempt – 
When – Agreement entered between the Petitioner-Association 
and Respondent permitted the latter to occupy and use the 
Property of the Petitioner for 10 years on payment of licence 
fees – Persistent defaults in the payment of licence fees by 
the Respondent – Litigation between parties across forums; 
settlement Agreement arrived at however, Respondent 
again defaulted in making payment thereunder – Eventually, 
matter reached this court; vide order dtd. 07.11.2022 as an 
interim measure, Respondent was directed to pay arrears of 
use and occupation charges in six monthly instalments  – 
Non-compliance by the Respondent alleging financial 
incapabilities – Contempt Petition filed by the Association:
Held: Civil contempt means wilful disobedience of judgment, 
decree, or direction, order, writ or other process of the Court or wilful 
breach of an undertaking given to the Court – All throughout, the 
Respondent had been in possession of the property and utilising the 
income generated from running of the said resort – Non-fulfilment of 
the mandate and direction of this Court which were at the request 
of the Respondent himself reflects his intent to not comply with 
the order rather to violate the same with impunity – The conduct 
clearly reflects that the intention of the Respondent was to gain 
the benefit by running the resort in the subject property without 
paying the current liability, what to say of the arrears – A party, 
* Author
2708
[2025] 4 S.C.R.
Supreme Court Reports
misguiding the Court to pass an order which was never intended 
to be complied with, would constitute an act of overawing the due 
process of law and, thus, commit contempt of Court – From the 
very beginning till the very end the Respondent took the Court for 
a ride – There has been intentional and deliberate non-compliance 
on the part of the Respondent of the order passed by this Court, 
contempt of which stands committed, but on getting an interim order 
of continuing in possession usurped the earnings instead of paying 
off the dues – Therefore, the malafide is writ large – Respondent 
guilty of Civil Contempt – 3 months simple imprisonment imposed 
with fine of INR 20,000/- – However, 30 days granted as one more 
opportunity to purge the contempt and comply with the Order dtd. 
07.11.2022. [Paras 28, 31, 36, 41, 42]
Case Law Cited
In re Hira Lal Dixit and Two Others [1955] 1 SCR 677 : (1954) 
2 SCC 325; Bank of India v. Vijay Transport and Others [2000] 
Supp. 3 SCR 685 : (2000) 8 SCC 512; Sitaram Enterprises v. 
Prithviraj Vardichand Jain [2024] 9 SCR 414 : 2024 SCC OnLine 
SC 2493 – referred to.
List of Acts
Contempt of Court Act, 1971.
List of Keywords
Contempt of Court; Civil contempt; Wilful disobedience; Non-
payment of arrears of use and occupation charges; Malafide 
intention; Misguiding the Court; Misuse of the process of court; 
Intentional and deliberate non-compliance of the order of court; 
Wilful breach of an undertaking given to the Court; Not approaching 
the Court with clean hands; Tarnish the image of judiciary.
Case Arising From
INHERENT JURISDICTION: Contempt Petition (Civil) No. 712  
of 2023
In 
SLP (Civil) No. 17433 of 2021
From the Judgment and Order dated 01.12.2023 of Supreme Court 
of India at New Delhi in SLP (C) No. 17433 of 2021
[2025] 4 S.C.R. 
2709
M/s Chithra Woods Manors Welfare Association v. Shaji Augustine
Appearances for Parties
Advs. for the Petitioner:
Nishe Rajen Shonker, Babu Karukapadath, Mrs. Anu K Joy,  
Alim Anvar.
Advs. for the Respondent:
Lakshmeesh S. Kamath, Mrs. Samriti Ahuja, Ms. Aditi Prakash, 
Karan Singh Dalal, Aditya Shenoy.
Judgment / Order of the Supreme Court
Judgment
Augustine George Masih, J.
1.	
The instant Contempt Petition (Civil) No. 712 of 2023 (hereinafter 
referred to as “instant Petition”) in SLP (C) No. 17433 of 2021 
(hereinafter referred to as “main Petition”) was filed during its 
pendency by M/s Chithra Woods Manors Welfare Association, being 
the Respondent No. 01 therein

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.