LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

M/S. BRITISH PAINTS (INDIA) LTD. versus ITS WORKMEN

Citation: [1966] 2 S.C.R. 523 · Decided: 04-11-1965 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: P.B. GAJENDRAGADKAR · Disposal: Case Partly allowed

Cited by 8 judgment(s) · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

• 
A 
JI 
-
c 
D 
' 
.E 
F 
G 
• 
H 
M/S. BRITISH PAINTS (INDIA) LTD. 
v. 
ITS WORKMEN 
Nuvember 4, 1965 
523 
[P. B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, C.J., K. N. WANCHOO, v. R.AMASWAMI 
AND P. SATYANARAYANA RAJU, JJ.] 
Industrial Disputes-Retiring age for workmen-Gratuity-Quantum 
and minimum years of qualifying service. 
Two matters in dispute between the management of a paints manufac-
turing company and their workmen, namely : (I) the age of retirement 
of the workmen and (ii) the introduction of a gratuity scheme for them, 
were referred ID the Industrial Tribunal. Before the reference was made 
the workmen were entitled to work so Jong as they were physically and 
mentally fit. 
The Tribunal fixed the age of retirement for clerical and 
subordinate staff at 58 years and for the factory workmen at 55 years. 
The Tribunal also introduced a gratuity scheme. It fixed 5 years minimum 
service in orderr to enable a work.man to earn gratuity and while fixing 
21 days' basic wage or salary as the quantum for gratuity for each com-
pleted year of service, included dearness allowance in the words "basic 
wage or salary." 
Both the management and workmen appealed to this Court. 
The 
workmen contended that : (i) the age of retirement both for the staff 
of the head office and the factory workmen should be fixed at 60 years, 
and (ii) 30 days' wages instead of 21 days should have been fixed as 
the quantum for gratuity. 
The management objected to the minimum 
period of five years to enable a workman to earn gratuity even in the 
case of voluntary retirement or resignation and contended for a longer 
minimum of service. The management also urged that dearness allowance 
should not be included in the basic wages for fixing the quantum of 
gratuity. 
HELD : ( i) The award of the Tribunal should be modified, fixing 
the age of retirement, for the clerical and subordinate staff as 'vell as for 
the factorv·workmen, 
whetiher existing or future, 
at the age of 60 
years. [527 BJ 
Age of retirement of 55 years was fixed in the last century in govern-
ment service and had become the pattern for fixing the age of retiremeDt 
everywhere. 
But considering the improvement in the standard of health 
and increase in longevity, the age of retirement should be fixed ordinarily 
at the higher level of 60 ye,ars. 
s:nce the work in the factory in the 
present case was not particularly arduous as compared to that of the 
clerical and subordinate staff, even in the case of factory-workmen there 
is no reason why the age of retirement should be fixed at a lower level, 
especially when the management could always terminate the service• of a 
workman if he becomes physically or mentally incapable of working, 
before the age of retirement. 
With the age of retirement at 60 years 
there will be the added advantage that more experienced workmen will be 
available to the management and that would be a cause for greater effi-
ciency. 
As there are no. valid and cogent reasons for making a <liffer-
ence in the age of retirement of existing workmen and those emnloyed 
in future, the future workmen, both clerical and subordinate staff as 
524 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[1966] 2 S.C.R. 
well as factory workmen, should also have the benefit of the same age 
of superannuation. 
[526 B-D; 527 B-D] 
(ii) No case for increasing the quantum of gratuity from 21 days' 
be.sic wage to 31) days' basic wage had been made out by the workmen, 
especially when. there was a provident fund scheme also in force in the 
concern and the workmen were thus getting two retiring benefits. 
[529 
HJ 
(iii) In the case of voluntary retirement or resignation by an employee 
before reaching the age of superannuation, the minimum period of quali-
fying service for gratuity should be 10 years, and not 5 years as prescribed 
by the Tribunal. [528 E] 
The reason for pro\iding a longer minimum period of earning gratuity 
A] 
B 
in the case of voluntary retirement or resignation is to see that worktnen 
do not leave one concern after another, after pu!ting in the short minimum 
service qualifying for gratuity; and gratuity schemes usually provide for c 
a longer minimum in the case of voluntary retirement or resignation. [527 
A-BJ 
(iv) Gratuity should be paid at the rate of 21 days' basic wage or 
salary for each completed year of service, but such basic wage would not 
include dearness or any other allowance. [529 F] 
As the gratuity scheme was being introduced for the first time in the 
concern, it wo

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.