M.P. MEDICAL OFFICERS ASSOCIATION versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
A B C D E F G H 67 M.P. MEDICAL OFFICERS ASSOCIATION v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 5527 of 2022) AUGUST 26, 2022 [M. R. SHAH AND B. V. NAGARATHNA, JJ.] Service Law – Recovery of excess amount paid – Employees- members of the appellant association were wrongly granted certain benefits under a circular till it was subsequently withdrawn, having been issued without authority and also without approval of Finance Department – State Govt. ordered recovery of the excess amount paid with interest – Single Judge quashed the communication withdrawing the circular and the orders of recovery of excess amount – Order set aside by Division Bench – Held: Division Bench justified in setting aside the order passed by Single Judge quashing the communication withdrawing the circular, considering the grounds on which the circular was withdrawn – Impugned order upholding the communication withdrawing the circular not interfered with – However, Division Bench erred in quashing the order passed by Single Judge setting aside the recovery of excess amount paid – It was the Department/State that issued the circular and paid the benefits thereunder – There was neither any misrepresentation by the concerned employees nor can the mistake be attributed to them – Mistake, if any, can be said to be that of the Department/State that issued the circular – On facts, State not justified in ordering recovery of the excess amount paid, also as some of the employees have retired and the recovery shall be from their pension/pensionary benefits – Order passed by Division Bench upholding the recovery of the excess amount paid, set aside – No recovery of the excess amount paid – However, for all other purposes including pay fixation and pension etc., the same shall be worked out as per order dtd 26.08.08 – M.P. Public Health and Family Welfare (Gazetted) Service Recruitment Rules, 2007 – M.P. Public Health and Family Welfare (Gazetted) Service Recruitment Rules, 1988. State of Punjab and others v. Rafiq Masih, (2015) 4 SCC 334 : [2014] 13 SCR 1343 – held inapplicable. [2022] 7 S.C.R. 67 67 A B C D E F G H 68 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2022] 7 S.C.R. Case Law Reference [2014] 13 SCR 1343 held inapplicable Para 5 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 5527 of 2022. From the Judgment and Orders dated 11.10.2018 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh Principal Bench at Jabalpur in W.A. No.1073 of 2018. With Civil Appeal Nos. 5528, 5529 and 5530 of 2022. P. S. Patwalia, Sr. Adv., Sanjay Sarin, Rohin Oza, Ms. Meghna Mittal, Ms. Gagan Deep Kaur, Aditya Sarin, Pushkar Karni Sinha, Dinkar Kalra, Prashant Shukla, Ms. Anushree Shukla, Ashu Bhindwar, Ankit Tiwari, Ms. Shubhi Bharadwaj, Abhinav Ramkrishna, Divyesh Pratap Singh, Advs. for the Appellant. Saurabh Mishra, AAG, Ms. Mrinal Elker Mazumdar, Ankit Mishra, Rahul Kaushik, Pashupathi Nath Razdan, Advs. for the Respondents. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by M. R. SHAH, J. 1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur in Writ Appeal No. 1073 of 2018 by which the High Court has allowed the said writ appeal preferred by the State of Madhya Pradesh and others and has quashed and set aside the judgment and order passed by the learned Single Judge passed in Writ Petition No. 6236 of 2014, the original writ petitioners – M.P. Medical Officers Association and other individual members of the Association have filed the present appeals. 2. The members of the appellant Association and other appellants were working as Specialists and Dental Specialists respectively under the M.P. Public Health and Family Welfare (Gazetted) Service Recruitment Rules, 1988. The said Rules were repealed by the M.P. Public Health and Family Welfare (Gazetted) Service Recruitment Rules, 2007 published in the Gazette on 27.03.2008. The State issued an order on 26.08.2008 to grant higher pay-scale on completion of six years to the Medical Officers, Dental Surgeons and officers working in the Specialist A B C D E F G H 69 cadre in a four tier pay-scales. Later, the circular dated 23.05.2009 was issued to the effect that the period from the date of appointment shall be counted as notional appointment though the benefit of the scheme shall be granted from the date of issuance of the order of the State Government dated 26.08.2008. In the circular dated 23.05.2009, it was also provided that the fourth tier pay-scale will be payable
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex