LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

M.C. MEHTA versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Citation: [1998] 1 S.C.R. 91 · Decided: 13-01-1998 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: J.S. VERMA, A.S. ANAND, B.N. KIRPAL

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

M.C. MEHTA 
A 
v. 
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. 
JANUARY 13, 1998 
B 
[J.S. VERMA, CJ!., DR. A.S. ANAND AND B.N. KIRPAL, JJ.] 
Environment Protection Act, 1986: 
S. 3(3)-National Capital Region-Region-Environmental pollution- C 
Environment pollution (Prevention and Control) Authority (headed by Shri 
Bhure Lal)-Order dated 7.1.1998 passed by this Court* modified to the 
effect that matters outside the scope of the authority of Bhurelal Committee 
would be dealt with by concerned Statutory Authorities-Earlier ad hoc 
Committee headed by Mr. Justice R.K. Shukla would cease to exist. 
D 
,., -1... 
*MC. Mehta v. Union of India and Ors., (1998] l SCR, order modified. 
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION: Writ Petition (C) No. 13029of1985. 
(Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India.) 
E 
Petitioner-in-person. (NP) 
Ashok H. Desai, Attorney General, H.N.Salve and G.L.Sanghi, Mukul 
Mudgal, ADN Rao, Wasim A.Qadri, Ms. Niranjana Singh, P. Parameshwaran, 
Arvind Kumar, Sandeep Narain, R.K. Kapoor, P. Vanna, S.K. Srivastava, Anis 
Ahmed Khan, S.N. Sikka, Vijay Panjwani, Ranjit Kumar, Kailash Vasdev, R. p 
Sasiprabhu, Manish Garg, Anees Ahmed, R.K. Maheshwari, Ashok Mathur, 
V.B. Saharya, Ejaz Maqbool, ~atish Aggarwal A.A. Khan, L.K. Pandey, S.L. 
Upadhyay, S.R. Setia, Sanjay Parikh, D.K. Garg and D.S. Mehra, for the 
appearing parties. 
The following Order of the Court was delivered : 
We have heard the learned Attorney General and the learned Amicus 
Curiae. The learned Attorney General has pointed out that the ad-hoc 
Committee set up pursuant to this Court's order dated 13th September, 1996 
G 
in IA No.18 in WP (C) 4677of1985 headed by Justice R K Shukla is no longer 
necessary after the constitution of the Authority under Section 3(3) of the H 
' 
91 
92 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[1998] I S.C.R. 
A Environment Protection Act headed by Shri Bhure La) but there may be some 
matters pertaining to environment which may be out side the scope of the 
authority of the Bhure Lal Committee and be required to be dealt with by the 
concerned Statutory Authority. It is submitted that a clarification to this effect 
may be made of our order dated January 7, 1998. We are satisfied that this 
B clarification of our earlier order is necessary. Accordingly, our order of January 
7, 1998 shall be read with the following modification/addition: 
c 
"Jn case there are certain matters which are outside the scope of the 
authority of Bhure Lal Committee constituted under Section 3(3) of the 
Environment Protection Act, the same shall be dealt with by the 
concerned Statutory Authorities. To avoid any ambiguity in this regard. 
we make it clear that on the constitution of the Committee, headed by 
Shri Bhure Lal as an authority under Section 3 (3) of the Act, the 
earlier ad-hoc Committee headed by Mr. Justice Shukla would cease 
to exit." 
D 
'This addition is to be treated as inserted in internal page 4 of the order 
' 
dated 7th January, 1998 in the paragraph beginning with the words 'In view 
,J._ 
of this order' after the words 'Committee headed by Sh. Bhure Lal on its 
constitution.' and before the sentence beginning with the words 'We also 
place on record our appreciation of the work done by Mr. Justice R K Shukla 
E R.P. 
Petition is still pending.