LALITA KUMARI versus GOVT. OF U.P. AND ORS.
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
[2013] 14 S.C.R. 713 ยท LALITA KUMARI ยท v. GOVT. OF U.P. AND ORS. (Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 68 of 2008 etc.) NOVEMBER 12, 2013 [P. SATHASIVAM, CJI., DR. B.S. CHAUHAN, RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI, RANJAN GOGOi AND S.A. BOBDE, JJ.] Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s. 154 - FIR - Registration of - Whether mandatory - Or requires the police to conduct preliminary inquiry to test the veracity of such information before registering it - Held: A B c The condition sine qua non for.registering FIR is that there 0 must be information and the information discloses commission of cognizable offence - The reasonableness or credibility of information is not a condition precedent for the registration of FIR - The provision u/s. 154 is mandatory and therefore it is mandatory for the police officer to register FIR E on the basis of information disclosing cognizable offence - Registration of the FIR is not in contravention of Art. 21 of the Constitution - However, there may be instances where preliminary inquiry may be necessary before registration of FIR e.g. matrimonial disputes, commercial offences, medical negligence cases, corruption cases etc. - However, such inquiry would be only to ascertain as to whether the information reveals any cognizable offence - Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 21. F ss.39 and 154(1) - Mandate u/s. 39 to inform about G commission of an offence - Implication of - Held: It would be incongruous to suggest that u/s. 39 it is duty of every citizen to inform about commission of an offence, but it is not 713 H 714 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2013] 14 S.C.R. A obligatory for the Officer incharge of the Police Station to register the report uls. 154. s .. 154, 4(2) and 5 - Registration of FIR - Rules in CBI Crime Manual, regarding preliminary inquiry - Applicability 8 of - To s. 154 - The concept of holding preliminary inquiry provided in CBI Crime Manual cannot be imported into the scheme of Cr. P. C. - CBI Crime Manual is not a statute, enacted by legislature but only a set of administrative orders and hence cannot supersede Cr.P.C. - Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946. c Penal Code, 1860- s.166A (as inserted by Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013) - Punishment for non-registration of FIR for the offences specified in the provision - Implication of - Held: The provision under s. 166A does not imply that the o registration of FIR is not compulsory for the offences other than those specified in s. 166A - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - s.154. Constitution of India, 1950: E Art.254(1), Seventh Schedule, Concurrent List Entry 2 and State List Entry 2 - Inconsistency between Laws enacted under Concurrent List and State List - Held: In case of inconsistency, law enacted under Concurrent List will prevail over the law enacted under State List - Hence, provisions of F Code of Criminal Procedure (enacted under Entry 2 of Concurrent List) would prevail over the provisions of Police Act and the provisions of Police Act (enacted under State List) would be void to the extent of repugnancy- Therefore, in case of inconsistency between s. 154 Cr.P. C. and s. 44 of Police G Act, s. 154 will prevail and s.44 (or similar provisions) shall be void to the extent of repugnancy - Police Act, 1861 - s.44. Art.21 - Right to life - Whether Violated, if FIR is registered without holding preliminary inquiry - Held: H Registration of FIR uls. 154 Cr. P. C. is the 'procedure LALITA KUMARI v. GOVT. OF U.P. 715 established by law' and thus is in conformity with Art.21 - A Hence registration of FIR as per the provisions of law, does not violate rights guaranteed under Art. 21. Investigation - Initiation of - By Police - Held: Police is not liable to launch investigation in evey FIR which is B mandatorily registered uls. 154 Cr.P. C. - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - ss.154 and 157. Police - Police records - FIR Books and General Diary! Daily Diary/Station Diary - Distinction between - Discussed. Interpretation of Statutes - Rule of interpretation - Literal rule of interpretation - Application of - For interpretation of s. 154 Cr.P.C. c Maxim - 'unius est exclusion alterius' - Applicability of - 0 For interpretation of s. 154 Cr.P.C .. Words and Phrases - Inquiry - Meaning of, in the context of s. 2(g) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The instant cases were referred to Constitution Bench for deciding the question whether a police
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex