LAL SINGH MARABI versus NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ORS.
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
[2017] 2 S.C.R. 759 LAL SINGH MARABI v. NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ORS. (Civil Appeal No. 3 764 of20 I 7) FERUARY 15, 2017 [JAGDISII SINGH KHEHAR, CJI, N.V. RAMANA AND DR. D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, JJ.] Motor Vehicles Act. 1988 - s.166 - Quantum of compensation - Grievous injuries resulting in amputation of leg - Claim for compensation - Plea of claimant that he was professional driver earning monthly income of Rs.-1000 which he lost due to 90% disabilily sustained in the accident - Tribunal held that claimant could 1101 prove hfaยท earning of Rs.-1000 p.111. by doing driving job - Tribunal fixed annual income at Rs.15000 and 60% decrease in his work efficiency and accordingly worked oul compensation- High Court enhanced compensation amount taking w111ual income as Rs.24000 -Appeal for enhanceme111 of co111pensa1ion - Held: Courts below erred in reducing !he per111anent disabiliry determined by the Doctor at 90% to 60% on the ground that despile the amputalion of his left leg, the remaining body of the appellant was heal1hy - Considering the factual matrix of the case including the fact that with the amputated leg the appeilant could not pursue his livelihood as a driver or daily wage labourer and taking into account the Doctors Certificate, permanent disability sustained due to the accidenl is taken as 90% - Thus, considering appellan/ :, annual income as Rs.24.000/- p.a .. 90% of it would be Rs.21,600/- and applying lhe multiplier 17, compensation awarded under the head of 'permanent disability' at Rs. 3,67.200/- - Also Rs.1.00.0001- awarded toward' lhe cost <if 1he artificial limb - 171e Iota/ quantum of co111pensatio11 amoulll enhanced .fiwn Rs. 3,57,800/- as awarded by the High Court. to Rs. 5.20,2001- and interest @ 6% p.a. from !he date of filing r!f !he claim pelition !ill realization of the a111ount. Allowing the appeal, the Court A B c D E F G HELD: There is no denial of the fact that the appellant had suffered a major injury in the accident and sustained a permanent H 759 760 A B c D E F SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2017] 2 S.C.R. disability by the amputation of his left leg. Consequently, the appellant, who was only 29 years old at the time of accident, had undergone agony, both physically and mentally besides spending money on his treatment and for the artificial limb. It is clear from the medical certificate issued by PW-2 that due to the amputation of his leg, the appellant sustained a permanent disability of 90%. The Courts below reduced the permanent disability factor from 90% to 60%. Upon appreciating the factual matrix of the case including the fact that with the amputated leg the appellant cannot pursue his livelihood as a driver or daily wage labourer and taking into account the Doctor's Certificate, the appellant has sustained 90% permanent disability due to the accident. Thus, considering the appellant's annual income as Rs.24,000/- p.a., 90% of it would come to Rs.21,600/- and applying the multiplier 17, he would be entitled nuder the bead of 'permanent disability' to compensation computed at Rs. 3,67,200/- (i.e.Rs.21,600 multiplied by 17). The appellant is also entitled to get Rs.1,00,000/- instead of Rs.60,000/ - as awarded by th~ High Court towards the cost of the artificial limb. Taking into account these figures, the total quantum of compensation amount would stand enhanced from Rs. 3,57 ,800/ - as awarded by the High Court, to Rs. 5,20,200/-. The appellant is also entitled to receive interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of filing of the claim petition till realization of the amount. [Paras 9, 10 and 11) [762-H; 763-A-F] National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Swaran Singh & Ors. (2004) 3 SCC 297 : [2004] 1 SCR 180 - referred to. J2004J 1 SCR 180 Case Law Reference referred to Para 6 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 3764 of2017. From the Judgment and Order dated 04.04.2013 of the High Court G of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur in M.A. No. 4056 of2006. H Chandra Mohan Anisctty (For Dr. Kai lash Chand), Adv. for the Appellant. Ravi Bakshi, Chander Shekhar Ashri, Ad vs. for the Respondent. LAL SINGH MARABI v. NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY 761 LTD. & ORS. The Order of the Court was delivered by A N.V:RAMANA, J. 1. Delay condoned. Leave granted. 2. The appellant, who was severely injured in a motor accident, has preferred this appeal aggrieved by the quantum of compensation awarded by the Principal Bench of the
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex