KRISHAN CHANDER NAYAR versus THE CHAIRMAN, CENTRAL TRACTOR ORGANISATION AND OTHERS
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
3 S.CJt.
SUPREME COURT REPORTS
KRISHAN CHANDER NAYAR
v.
THE CHAIRMAN, CENTRAL TRACTOR
ORGANISATION AND OTHERS
187
(B. P. SINHA, c. J., s. K. DAS, A. K. SARKAR,
K.C.DAs GUPTA and N. RAJAGOPALAAYYANGAR, JJ.)
State Employment-Arbitrary impo$ifion of ban again8t
-;.,
such employm~nt-If violates fundamental right-Oonslitution of
Jlldia, A.rt. 16(1).
,
Arbitrary imposition of a ban against a person's entry
into Government service amounts to an infringement of his
right to equality of opportunity guaranteed by Art. 16(1)of
the Constitution.
That Article guarantees not merely the right to make ~n
application for State employment but also a consideration on
merits of that application when made.
Consequently, in the instant case, where such a ban was
in fact imposed on the petitioner but the affidavit filed in
answer to bis petition on behalf of the authority imposing the
ban failed to indicate its nature and merely reiterated that the
petitioner had not been deprived of his right to apply a'lld ·no
qpportu11ity bad been given to the petitioner of showing cause
against the imposition of the ban which evidently prevented
his applicatoin being considered .on the merits.
Held, that there was a clear infringement of the pcti·
tioners fundamental right under Art. 16(1) of the constitution.
The necessity for exact, concise and clear statelrients in
affidavits must be emphasised.
ORIGINAL ,TURISDIOTJON : Petition No. 107 of
1957.
Petition under Art. 32 of the Constitution of
India for enforcement of Fundamental Rights.
D. D. Chawla, for the petitioner.
C. K: Daphtwry, SoUcitor-General oJ
lndia,
H.J. Umrigar and T.M. Sen, for the respondents.
1961. August 23. The Judgment of the Court
was delivered by
,. ~
SINHA, C. J.-This petition under Mt. 32 of
the Constitution prays for a writ of ml.llldamu11 or
11n;y other appropriate writ or direction to
tJi~
SiW.. ('. J.
·-, ' -· -...
j
/
188,
· SUPREME.COURT. REPORTS
[1962]
respondents
to
remove
the ban against
~he
Krithan Chander
petitioner against his entry into government service.
Nayar
The respondents to the petition are :
1961
TM Chairman,
: I: The . Chairman,. Central
Tractor
c0~;,";/;',,~f;',;'
Organisation, Ministry of Food and Agricul-
. · -·- ·- ·' > ture,· Government of India, New .Delhi. ·
Sinha a. J.' •
------ - --
, "''
2. The Secretary, Ministry of Food. and
Agriculture, New Delhi. '
.
.
3. The Secretary, Ministry of Home
Affairs, Government· of India, New Delhi.
The petition. is founded - on . the following
· allegations. The petitioner is a trained machine-
man. In 1948, he was employed as a machineman
in the Central Tractor Organisatfon: -He continued
in government service and rendered a good account
of himself in that service until, by. a . notice dated
September '16, 1954, his services were terminated.
The: office order No. 375 terminating his services is
af Annexure .'A' to_ the petition and is in these
terms:,,.
·
'.'Shri K. C. Nayar s/o Dr. Tara Chand
Designation . l\I/l\Ian is ·informed that his
.. , ·· services
are ·no longer . required in this
··,::.'·~'.Organisation. · His services will accordingly
· '..
stand terminated with immediate effect from
the date on which this notice is served on
him. In lieu of the notice for ODO month due
to him under rule 5 · of the Central Civil
Service (Temporary Service) Rules, Shri K.C .
. '
.. Nayar will be given pay and allowances, .for
' that period. The payment of allowances will,
however, be subject to .the conditions under .
. ,.: · .. which• such allowances are otherwise admissi·
:: .ble." •·.":
The. petitioner appealed against the said order of
termjnation of his services, but his appeal was ·
rejected· on December . 6, 1954 (Annexure . 'B').
Thereafter .. the petitioner applied for and obtained
· ~ :cerlgi~te in the following terms (Annexure 'C'):,
.
.
.
I
;
•
..
••
-
t
-
'
'
i ':t .
3 s.o.R.
SUP;R~ME COURT REPORTS
189
"Certified that·. Shri Krishan ·.·Chander
. NayiJ.r
served in thiS organisation as, II<.
Machineman in the scale .of Rs. 125-6-185 with
effect from 13-5-1948 to 21-9-1954.
His
services· were terminated under Rule 5 of the
Central Civil ServiceH (Temporary Service)
Rules, 1949."
After receiving the certificate aforesaid, the peti-
tioner made several applications for appointment
under the Government, but without any results.
Later on "thP petitioner learnt to his dismay that
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex