KISHANSING TOMAR versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF AHMEDABAD AND ORS.
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
A B c D E F G H KISHANSING TOMAR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF AHMEDABAD AND ORS. OCTOBER 19, 2006 [Y.K. SABHARWAL, CJ., K.G. BALAKRISHNAN, S.H. KAPADIA, C.K. THAKKER AND P.K. BALASUBRAMANYAN, JJ.] Constitution of India, 1950: Article 243-U-Election to Municipal Corporation-Constituting new elected Municipal body-Held, the period of five years fixed under the Article to constitute the Municipality is mandatory in nature and has to be followed in all respects-Any revision of electoral rolls shall be carried out in time and if it cannot be so carried out the elections have to be conducted on the basis of the then existing rolls-Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949-ss. 6 and 6-8. Articles 243-K, 243-ZA(l) and 324-Powers of State Election Commission-Held, in terms a/Article 243-K and 243-ZA(J), the same powers are vested in State Election Commission as in the Election Commission of India under Article 324-State Government concerned shall have to render fit!/ assistance and co-operation to the State Election Commission and respect the latter's assessment of the needs in order to ensure free and fair elections. The term of the elected body of the respondent-Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (AMC) was due to expire on October 15, 2005. The appellant, who was the Chairman of the Standing Committee of the AMC, apprehended that the authoritie~โข might delay the process of election to constitute the new Municipal body and, therefore, filed a writ petition before t'1e High Court on 23.8.2005 for a writ or direction to the respondents to take all steps necessary for the purpose of holding elections to the Municipal Corporation of the City before expiry of th1~ duration of the existing body as envisaged by Article 243- U of the Constitution of India. Respondent no. 3, the State Election Commission in its reply stated that in view of the increase in the number of wards, the Commission was required to proceed with the exercise of delimitation of the wards of the city and as the political parties were required to be consulted it 454 #",,. ., KISHANS!NG TOMAR "ยท MUNI. CORPN. OF THE CITY OF AHMEDABAD 45 5 would take at least six months time to complete the process of eledion, and A that the Commission could act only after the State Government issued the notification. The Single Judge, accepting the time frame suggested by the State Election Commission, directed that the process of election must be completed by 31.12.2005 and no further extension for holding the elections would be permissible. Appellant's Letters Patent Appeal was dismissed. B Aggrieved, he filed the present appeal. Meanwhile the elections to the Municipal Corporation were held and the new Municipal body has been constituted. On the question: whether Article 243-U of the Constitution of India, by which the duration of the Municipality is fixed, is mandatory in nature and C any violation thereof could be justified in the circumstances stated by the respondents, Disposing of the appeal, the Court HELD: 1.1. The provisions contained in Article 243-U of the Constitution D make it clear that the period of live years fixed thereunder to constitute the Municipality is mandatory in nature and has to be followed in all respects. The constitutional mandate is that election to a Municipality shall be completed before the expiry of the live years period stipulated in Clause (1) of Article 243-U and in case of dissolution, the new body shall be constituted before the expiration of a period of six months and elections have to be E conducted in such a manner. The duration of the Municipality is fixed as live years from the date of its first meeting and no longer. It is incumbent upon the Election Commission and other authorities to carry out the mandate of the Constitution and to see that a new Municipality is coostituted in time and elections to the Municipality are conducted before the expiry of its duration. F Taking into account the factors enumerated in the judgment and applying the principles of golden rule of interpretation, the object and purpose of Article 243-U is to be carried out. (463-A-B-D; 466-C; 467-H) Re: Special Reference No. 1 of2002 Gujarat Assembly Elections matter, 120021 s sec 237, referred to. G 1.2. The election has to be held on the basis of the electoral rolls which are in force on the last date for making nomination. Any revision of electoral rolls shall be carrie
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex