LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATION versus VINCENT PAUL & ANR.

Citation: [2011] 3 S.C.R. 862 · Decided: 14-03-2011 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: P. SATHASIVAM · Disposal: Disposed off

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

A 
B 
[2011) 3 S.C.R. 862 
KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATION 
v. 
VINCENT PAUL & ANR. 
(Civil Appeal No. 3446 of 2003) 
MARCH 14, 2011 
[P. SATHASIVAM AND DR. B.S. CHAUHAN, JJ.] 
CONTRACT: 
c 
Tender - Non-compliance of conditions - Condition of 
the tender to deposit 25% of sale price within one week - Letter 
issued to the sole tenderer to deposit the amount of sale price 
after adjusting the earnest money - Another letter sent to the 
bidder that further proceedings could be finalized only after 
D the temporary injunction was vacated by court - Held: Unless 
the conditions were fulfilled, the bidder cannot take advantage 
of mere remittance of a sum towards earnest money - Trial 
court rightly dismissed the suit for specific perfo 
mance of agreement of auction sale - High Court in an 
E effoneous assumption effed in concluding that there was a 
valid contract and for granting a decree for specific 
performance - Judgment of High Court set aside - Specific 
performance of contract - Suit. 
F 
STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION ACT, 1951: 
s.29 - Taking over of the borrower firm and attachment. 
and sale of its security in discharge of debt - Notice inviting 
tenders published by KFC in a local news paper- Negotiation 
wit the sole tenderer - Held: KFC has not strictly followed the 
G procedure in bringing the property to sale -
State 
Government has not framed Rules or guidelines for sale of 
properties owned by them - Till such formation of Rules or 
guidelines or orders, KFC is directed to adhere to the 
directions for sale of properties owned by it, as issued by the 
H 
862 
· KERALA FINANCIAL CORPORATION v. VINCENT 
863 
PAUL & ANR. 
Court in the judgment - Contract. 
A 
The Kerala Finance Corporation (KFC), for recovery 
of its loan amount from a firm, took over the borrower firm 
u/s 29 of the State Financial Corporation Act, 1951, on 
11.09.1987. On the same day the firm filed O.S. No. 2194/ 8 
87 with an application for temporary injunction 
restraining KFC from taking over the firm. KFC invited 
tenders and held negotiation with sole bidder, namely, the 
respondent, in respect of the property of the firm, and 
issued a letter on 31-10-1988 to the respondent 
expressing the willingness to sell the property for Rs. 8.25 C 
lakh subject to certain conditions. On 01.11.1988 the firm 
filed another suit being O.S. No. 2109/88 for injunction to 
restrain the KFC from taking any action pursuant to the 
auction/sale proceedings, and the trial court directed to 
maintain status quo as on 31.10.1988. Eventually, both D 
the suits were dismissed. The firm filed A.S. No. 56 of 
1992 against the dismissal of O.S. No. 2109/88 and A.S. 
No. 146of1993 against dismissal of O.S. No. 2194of1987. 
On 6.12.1994 the respondent filed O.S. No.1522/94 for 
specific performance of agreement of sale. Subsequently, 
E 
both the appeals filed by the firm were dismissed. The 
suit of the respondent was also dismissed and he filed 
A.S. No. 557 of 2000. On 17.09.2001 the KFC invited fresh 
tenders for sale of the assets and one 'KKU' offered Rs. 
55,55,555/- which was the highest bid. Meanwhile on , F 
27 .11.2001, the appeal of the respondent was allowed 
and his suit for specific performance of agreement of sale 
was decreed by the High Court. KFC challenged the 
judgment of the High Court by filing C.A. No. 3446 of 2003, 
and KKU filed C.A.No. 3450 of 2003. KKU also filed C.A .• G 
No. 3451 of 2003 against the order of the High Court 
dismissing his O.P. No. 33834 of 2001. as ·infructuous . 
. Disposing of the appeals, the Court 
f-!ELD: 1.1. KFC is incorporated u/s 3 of the State H 
864 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
(2011) 3 S.C.R. 
A Financial Corporation Act, 1951; Section 29 of the Act 
empowers the KFC to attach and sell the security in 
discharge of debts and provides for speedy recovery. 
The procedure of attachment and sale of property though 
available under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, it shall 
B apply only when there is a decree at the instance of any 
of the parties. In the instant case, the KFC had not 
proceeded through the Civil Court but has taken 
independent action u/s 29 of the Act. [para 6-7] [871-G-
H; 872-A-B] 
c 
1.2. By notice under Ext. B1, KFC invited tenders 
from inte·nding buyers for purchase of immovable 
property attached by it. The last date for submission of 
tender was 31.10.1988. The respondent submitted a 
tender quoting an amount of Rs. 7.5 lakh as bidding 
D amount and the price was, ultimately, fixed at 

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.