KAMALAKHYA DEY PURKAYASTHA AND ORS. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
[2017) 12 S.C.R. 79 KAMALAKHYA DEY PURKAYASTHA AND ORS. A v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS . . (Writ Petition (Civil) No. 10~0 of2017) DECEMBER 05, 2017 [RANJAN GOGOi AND R. F. NARIMAN, JJ.] B Citizenship (Registratio11 of Citizens and Issues of National lde11tity Cards) Rules, 2003 - Schedule (Special Provisions as to man11er of Preparation of National Register of Indian Citizen in C State of Assam) - Clause 3(3) - National Register of Indian Citizen - Claims for inclusion of perso11s who are originally inhabitants of the State of Assam - Expression "originally inhabitants of the State of Assam" - Clarification of- Held: Identification of persons who are originally inhabitants of the State of Assam as against those who are not does not determine cmy entitlement for inclusion in the D NRC which is on the basis of proof of citizenship alone and nothing else - Neither does such identification confer a11y !fiecial entitlement or benefit - Apprehension that by the process of verification of the claims for inclusio11 in the National Register of Indian Citizen (NRC) based on the claim to be originally inhabitants of the State of Assam E a superior class of citizens is being created are wholly unfounded - Exercise of upgradation of NRC is not intended to be one of identification and determination of who are originally inhabitants of the State of Assam - Sole test for inclusion in the NRC is citizenship under the Constitution of India and under the Citizenship Act including s.6A thereof - Citizens who are origi11ally inhabitants of F the State of Assam and those who are not are at par for inclusion in the NRC. . Disposing of the writ petitions and Interlocutory Applications, the Court HELi): 1.1 Clause 3(3) of the Schedule (Special Provisions as to manner .of Preparation of National Register of Indian Citizen in State of Assam) to the Citizenship (Registration of Citizens and Issues of National Identity Cards) Rules, 2003 provides for identification of persons entitled to be included in the National 79 G H 80 A B c D E F SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2017] 12 S.C.R. Register of Citizens (NRC) by a process different from what is enumerated in Clause 3(2) and, therefore, the said Clause i.e. 3(3) constitutes an exception thereto. Clause 3(3) contemplates a less strict and vigorous process for deciding claims for inclusion in the NRC insofar as persons who are originally inhabitants of the State of Assam are concerned. Identification of persons who are originally inhabitar.ts of the State of Assam as against those who are not does not determine any entitlement for inclusion in the NRC which is on the basis of proof of citizenship alone and nothing else. Neither does such identification confer any special entitlement or benefit. This has, infact, been clarified in several of the reports submitted by the learned Coordinator before this Court. [Para 4] [83-B-D] The prayer made in the writ petitions and the I.As, is founded on an apprehension that by the process of verification of the claims for inclusion in the NRC based on the claim to be originally inhabitants of the State of Assam a superior class of citizens is being created. The question who is originally inhabitant of the State of Assam, according to the applicants and the writ petitioners, ":ay also have impact on the entitlement of such persons in th1: matter of opportunities for education, employment etc. vis-a-vis the second category of citizens i.e. who are not originally inhabitants of Assam. All such apprehensions are wholly unfounded. The exercise of upgradation of NRC is not intended to be one of identification and determination of who are originally inhabitants of the State of Assam. The sole test for inclusion in the NRC is citizenship under the Constitution of India and under the Citizenship Act including Section 6A thereof. Citizens who are originally inhabitants/residents of the State of Assam and those who are not are at par for inclusion in the NRC. In view thereof, there is no reason to issue any direction or clarification as to the meaning of the term "originally inhabitants of the State of Assam" G as sought for in the present Writ Petitions and the Interlocutory Application(s). [Paras 5-7] [83-E-H; 84-A-B] H CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION : Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1020 of 2017. KAMALAKHYA DEY PURKAYASTHA AND ORS. v. UNION 81 OF INDIA AND ORS. Under Article 32 of the Constitution
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex