LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
โš–๏ธ Ask the AI about your situation:๐Ÿš— Car Accident๐Ÿ’ผ Work / Job๐Ÿ  Housing / Eviction๐Ÿ‘ช Family / Divorce๐Ÿ“‹ Contract Dispute๐Ÿ’ฐ Money Owed

KALYANI MATHIVANAN versus K. V. JEYARAJ AND ORS.

Citation: [2015] 3 S.C.R. 467 · Decided: 11-03-2015 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: S. J. MUKHOPADHAYA · Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

Cited by 6 judgment(s) · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2015] 3 S.C.R. 467 
KALYANI MATHIVANAN 
v. 
K. V. JEYARAJ AND ORS. 
Civil Appeal No. 5946-5947 of2014 
MARCH 11, 2015. 
[SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA AND 
N. V. RAMANA, JJ.] 
Service law-Appointment- Post of Vice-Chancellor 
A 
B 
'C 
of the University- Appellant's appointment to the said post 
challenged, on the ground that as per the UGC Regulations 
2010, appellant did not fulfill the eligibility criteria -Appellant 
neither a distinguished academician, with a minimum of 10 D 
years experience as professor in a University system nor 10 
years of experience in an equivalent position in a reputed 
research/academic organization -Appellant's case that she 
was qualified for the post as per the 1965 Act; and that UGC 
Regulations, 2010 were directory and cannot override the E 
provisions of the 1965 Act- Appointment set aside by the 
High Court- On appeal, held: Post of Vice-Chancellor under 
the 1965 Act is a post of an Officer - Provisions regarding 
Vice-Chancellor was made for the first time under UGC F 
Regulations, 201 O"'" UGC Regulations, 2010 are mandatory 
to teachers and other academic staff in all the Central 
Universities and Colleges thereunder; and directory for the 
Universities, Colleges and other higher educational 
institutions under the State Legislation as the matter has been G 
left to the State Government to adopt and implement the 
Scheme - Thus, UGC Regulations, 2010 is partly mandatory 
and is partly directory- UGC Regulations, 2010 having not 
adopted by the State, the conflict between State Legislation 
.H 
467 
468 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[2015] 3 S.C.R. 
A 
and Statutes framed under Central Legislation does not arise 
- Once it is adopted by the State Government, the State 
Legislation is to be amended appropriately and there shall 
be no conflict between the State Legislation and the Central 
Legislation - Thus, the appointment of the appellant as Vice 
B Chancellor, Madurai Kamaraj University upheld - UGC 
Regulations of Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of 
Teachers and other Academic Staff in Universities and 
Colleges and Measures for the Maintenance of Standards 
C inHigher Education 2010- Regulations 7.0.0., 7.3.0., 7.4.0 
- University Grants Commission Act, 1956 - ss. 12, 14, 26, 
28- Madurai Kamaraj University Act, 1965 - ss. 2(m), (n), 
(t), 8, 9, 10, 12, 23, 24, 32-Constitution of/ndia, 1950-Art. 
246, Seventh Schedule List I entry 66, List Ill entry 25, Art. 
D 254. 
Allowing the appeals, the Court 
HELD: 1.1 The appointment of the appellant as 
ViceChancellor, Madurai Kamaraj University as made by 
E the G.O. (1D)No.80, Higher Education (H2) Department, 
Government of Tamil Nadu dated 9th April, 2012 is upheld 
and the judgment and order passed by the Division 
Bench of the High Court is set aside. [Para 45] [525-A-B] 
F 
1.2 The post of Vice-Chancellor under the 
University Act, 1965 isa post of an Officer. The University 
Grants Commission Act 1956 as also University Grants 
Commission Regulations, 2000 are silent in regard to 
G post of Vice-Chancellor. The provisions regarding Vice-
Chancellor have been made for the firsttime under UGC 
Regulations, 201 o. UGC Regulations, 2010 is not 
applicable to the Universities, Colleges and other higher 
educational institutions coming under the purview of the 
H ยท State Legislature unless State Government wish to adopt 
KALYANI MATHIVANAN v. K. V. JEYARAJ AND ORS. 
469 
and implement the Scheme subject to the terms and A 
conditions therein. The University Act has not been 
amended in terms of UGC Regulations, 2010 nor was 
any action taken by the UGC under Section 14 of UGC 
Act, .1956 as a consequence of failure of University to 
comply with the recommendations of the Commission B 
under Section 14ofthe UGCAct, 1956. (Para 39, 40] (520-
F-H; 521-A-B, C-D] 
1.3 To the extentthe State Legislation is in conflict 
with Central Legislation including sub-ordinate C 
legislation made by the Central Legislation under Entry 
25 of the Concurrent List shall be repugnant to the 
Central Legislation and would be inoperative. The UGC 
Regulations being passed by both the Houses of D 
Parliament, though a sub-ordinate legislation has binding 
effect on the Universities to which it applies. UGC 
Regulations, 2010 are mandatory to teachers and other 
academic staff in all the Central Universities and Colleges 
thereunder and the Institutions deemed to be Universities E 
whose maintenance expenditure is met by the UGC. UGC 
Regulations, 2010

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.