LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

KAILASH @ TANTI BANJARA versus STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Citation: [2013] 4 S.C.R. 875 · Decided: 10-04-2013 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: B.S. CHAUHAN, F.M. IBRAHIM KALIFULLA · Disposal: Dismissed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2013] 4 S.C.R. 875 
KAILASH @ TANTI BANJARA 
v. 
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH 
(Criminal App~al No. 1962 of 2010) 
APRIL 10, 2013 
[DR. B.S. CHAUHAN AND FAKKIR MOHAMED 
IBRAHIM KALIFULLA, JJ.] 
A 
B 
Penal Code, 1860 - ss. 376 and 5068 - Rape - Courts 
below though found that the intercourse was with the consent C 
of prosecutrix, but convicted him finding that the prosecutrix 
was 14 years of age - On appeal, held: Conviction justified -
In view of the conclusion that the prosecutrix was in the age 
group of 13-14 years, consent of the prosecutrix has no 
consequence. 
D 
Vijay @ Chinee vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2010) 8 
SCC 191 : 2010 (8) SCR 1150 • relied on. 
Case Law Reference: 
2010 (8) SCR 1150 
relied on 
Para 5 
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Criminal Appeal 
No. 1962 of 2010. 
E 
From the Judgment and Order dated 09.10.2009 of the 
F 
High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in Criminal Appeal 
No. 1395 of 1994. 
Rajeev Kumar Bansal, M.P. Singh, Akshay K. Ghai for the 
Appellant. 
Vibha Datta Makhija for the Respondent. 
The following Order of the Court was delivered 
875 
G 
H 
A 
876 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[2013] 4 S.C.R. 
ORDER 
1. This appeal is directed against the impugned judgment 
of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in Criminal 
Appeal No.1395/1994 by which the conviction and sentence 
8 
imposed on the appellant under Section 376 IPC to undergo 
rigorous imprisonment for seven years apart from a fine amount 
of Rs.500/- and in default of payment of fine, to under one 
months' additional rigorous imprisonment was confirmed. 
2. According to the prosecution on 11.4.1991 the victim 
C P.W.4, an agricultural labourer was in the field of Mali Singh 
Darbar and loading the wheat on the vehicle. After the field 
work, she was proceeding to her village which was 1% miles 
away. The appellant was following P.W.4 who was proceeding 
alongwith minor girl Manju, aged 10 years in his motorcycle. 
D On the way, P.W.4 suffered thorn bite in her foot and while she 
was removing the thorn, Manju left her and proceeded towards 
her home. Taking advantage of the !onliness of P.W.4, the 
appellant stated to have grabbed her hand against her will, took 
her near the bushes at Kauve near the drain and had forcible 
E sexual intercourse for about Y. an hour. According to the victim 
P.W.4, sexual intercourse was carried out by the appellant near 
the drain and again after taking her to his house under the threat 
of knife point and performed the same evil act in the house also. 
Subsequently at about 3.00 in the midnight, he took her in his 
F motorcycle and dropped near the community well and after 
threatening her at knife point that if she reveal any of the act 
committed by him, she would kill her, left that place. P.W.4 felt 
humiliated and having ashamed of loss of modesty, jumped into 
the community well while the appellant stated to have fled away 
G from that place. Though P.W.4 jumped into the well, according 
to her, she was able to grab the rope which was present inside 
the well and she cried for help. On hearing her distress call, the 
villagers stated to have turned up and rescued her. Thereafter, 
her father and grand father stated to have reached that place 
whereafter she was taken to her house and after change of 
H 
KAILASH @ TANTI BANJARA v. STATE OF MADHYA 877 
PRADESH 
cloth she went to the Police Station and lodged the FIR. 
A 
3. The appellant was charged for the offence under Section 
376 read with Section 506 B, IPC. The trial Court after a detailed 
consideration of the evidence placed before it concluded that 
the FSL report, Exhibit P .14 established that in the peticoat of 
8 
P.W.4, in her private parts as well as the vagina, human sperms 
was found present and therefore the plea of ignorance pleaded 
by the appellant was not true. The trial court however, r.oncluded 
that the intercourse was with the consent of P.W.4. Based on 
the expert evidence and applying the principles for ascertaining 
the age of the victim, the trial court has concluded as under: 
C 
"14. For ascertaining the age the position of gums, private 
part and under arms are of great help. According to the 
statement of Dr. Smt. Saluja (P.W.2) 7 teeth in the right 
and 6 teeth in the left total 13 teeth were found in the upper 
D 
jaw. In the lower jaw 7-7 teeth in the right and left sides 
were found. Therefore, total 14 teeth were found in the 
lower jaw. It is clear from the position of the teeth that th

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.