LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
βš–οΈ Ask the AI about your situation:πŸš— Car AccidentπŸ’Ό Work / Job🏠 Housing / EvictionπŸ‘ͺ Family / DivorceπŸ“‹ Contract DisputeπŸ’° Money Owed

JYOTI BUILDERS versus CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER & ORS.

Citation: [2025] 12 S.C.R. 317 · Decided: 02-12-2025 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: J.B. PARDIWALA · Disposal: Disposed off

cites 3 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2025] 12 S.C.R. 317 : 2025 INSC 1372
Jyoti Builders 
v. 
Chief Executive Officer & Ors.
(Civil Appeal No. 14512 of 2025)
02 December 2025
[J.B. Pardiwala* and K.V. Viswanathan, JJ.]
Issue for Consideration
Whether a mandamus should be issued to the State Government 
to acquire the subject property in accordance with s.14(1) of 
the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and 
Redevelopment) Act, 1971 keeping in mind the order dated 
26.02.2015 (2015 order) passed by the Chief Executive Officer-Slum 
Rehabilitation Authority (SRA); whether the appellant is entitled to 
full Occupation Certificate for the final sale building in the slum 
scheme upon handing over the portion of land admeasuring 2700 
sq. mts. meant for Recreational Ground (RG) identified as the dark 
green portion; whether the appellant has been fully compensated 
by granting an equivalent and/or adequate area (FSI) for sale by 
the State Government.
Headnotes†
Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) 
Act, 1971 – s.14 r/w s.3D(c)(i) – Under the Development Plan 
of 1991 for Mumbai, the Subject Property was reserved for 
Recreational Ground (RG) – In 2015, an order was passed by 
respondent No.1-SRA after giving notice to and hearing to all 
the concerned including the respondent No.5 (the then owner) 
inter alia holding that the Slum Scheme of the appellant-builder 
had substantially been implemented on the entire area covering 
the Project Property (including the Subject Property) and the 
Subject Property was liable to be acquired in the interest 
of the slum scheme and the slum dwellers on the Subject 
Property had to be rehabilitated by the appellant – Respondent 
No.5 transferred her title rights in the subject property in 
favour of the respondent No.4 who floated its own proposal 
for implementation of the slum rehabilitation scheme – Writ 
* Author
318
[2025] 12 S.C.R.
Supreme Court Reports
petition filed by the appellant questioning the orders passed by 
the SRA granting sanction to the respondent No.4 and refusal 
to implement the 2015 Order and; seeking a mandamus for 
the acquisition of the subject property relying on the SRA’s 
2015 order – Dismissed by High Court – Challenge to:
Held: Power of the State Government u/s.14 r/w s.3D(c)(i), Slum 
Act is subject to preferential right, if any, of the owner – It is 
undisputed that when the respondent No.4 submitted its proposal 
for development of the subject property in 2022, the same was 
accepted in accordance with law as there was no slum scheme 
proposal on the subject property – On facts, no case made out 
by the appellant for a writ of mandamus to be issued to the State 
Government to acquire the subject property u/s.14, Slum Act – 
Appellant is entitled to the Occupation Certificate for the Final 
Sale Building in the slum scheme on the appellant handing over 
the Dark Green Portion admeasuring 2700 sq. mts. reserved 
for RG – Further, the appellant has been fully compensated by 
granting adequate area/FSI for sale – Respondent No. 4, their 
successors and assigns shall not put up any type of construction 
on the subject property and the same shall be utilized only as a 
RG. [Paras 67, 77]
Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) 
Act, 1971 – Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966 – 
Development Control Regulations, 1991 – Scheme of the Slum 
Act, 1971. [Paras 60-62]
Case Law Cited
Tarabai Nagar Co-Op. Hog. Society (Proposed) v. State of 
Maharashtra & Ors. [2025] 8 SCR 1193 : 2025 SCC OnLine SC 
1795; Saldanha Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. v. Bishop John Rodrigues 
& Ors., 2025 SCC OnLine SC 1794 – relied on.
State of Uttar Pradesh v. Jogendra Singh [1964] 2 SCR 197 : 
1963 SCC OnLine SC 96; State of Tamil Nadu v. Governor of 
Tamil Nadu & Anr. [2025] 4 SCR 985 : 2025 SCC OnLine SC 
770 – referred to.
Citispace & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra, Order passed by the 
Bombay High Court dated 31.07.2002 in Writ Petition No. 1152 
of 2002 – referred to.
[2025] 12 S.C.R. 
319
Jyoti Builders v. Chief Executive Officer & Ors.
List of Acts
Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and 
Redevelopment) Act, 1971; Maharashtra Regional Town Planning 
Act, 1966; Development Control Regulations, 1991.
List of Keywords
Section 14, Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and 
Redevelopment) Act, 1971; No mandamus can be issued to 
State Government to acquire property under Section 14, Slum 
Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 
1971; Recreational Ground;

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.