LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
โš–๏ธ Ask the AI about your situation:๐Ÿš— Car Accident๐Ÿ’ผ Work / Job๐Ÿ  Housing / Eviction๐Ÿ‘ช Family / Divorce๐Ÿ“‹ Contract Dispute๐Ÿ’ฐ Money Owed

JT. C. I. T., MUMBAI versus M/S ROLTA INDIA LTD.

Citation: [2011] 1 S.C.R. 146 · Decided: 07-01-2011 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: S.H. KAPADIA · Disposal: Disposed off

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

A 
B 
c 
(2011] 1 S.C.R. 146 
JT. C. I. T., MUMBAI 
V. 
MIS ROLTA INDIA LTD. 
(Civil Appeal No. 135 of 2011 etc.) 
JANUARY 7, 2011 
[S.H. KAPADIA,CJI, K.S. PANICKER RADHAKRISHNAN 
AND SWATANTER KUMAR, JJ.] 
Income TAX ACT, 1961: 
ss. 115JA/115JB and 2348!234C - MAT Companies -
Interest on tax calculated on book profits - HELD: Interest u/ 
ss 2348 and 234C shall be payable on failure to pay advance 
tax in respect of tax payable u/ss 115JA/115JB - Circular No. 
0 
1312001 dated 9.11.2001 issued by CBDT. 
The assessee in C.A. No. 135 of 2011 furnished a 
return of income on 28.11.1997 declaring total income as 
Nil. On 28.3.2000, an order u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax 
Act, 1961 was passed determining the total income as nil 
E after set off of unabsorbed business loss and 
depreciation. The tax was levied on book profits 
determined as per the provisions of s.115JA. The interest 
u/s 2348 was charged on tax on book profits as worked 
r 
out in the order of assessment. The assessee's appeal 
F was dismissed by the CIT (A) as also by the Income Tax 
Appellate Tribunal. The High Court following the judgment 
of Karnataka High Court in the case of Kwality Biscuits 
Ltd.1 held in favour of the assessee that interest u/s 2348 
could not be charged on the tax calculated on book 
G profits. 
H 
In the instant appeals, the question for consideration 
before the Court was: whether interest u/s 2348 can be 
1. 
Kwality Biscuits Ltd. Vs. CIT (2000) 243 !TR 519 .. 
146 
JT. C. I. T., MUMBAI v. ROLTA INDIA LTD. 
147 
charged on the tax calculated on book profits u/s 115JA? A 
-~ 
Allowing the appeals of Revenue and dismissing 
those of the assesses, the Court 
HELD: 
8 
1.1 Sections 115J/115JA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 
are special provisions, which provide that where in the 
case of an assessee, the total income as computed under 
the Act in respect of any previous year relevant to the 
assessment year is less than 30% of the book profit, the c 
total income of the assessee shall be deemed to be an 
amount equal to 30% of such book profit. The object is 
to tax zero-tax companies. [para 7] [156-E-FJ 
1.2 The pre-requisite condition for applicability of s. D 
2348 is that the assessee is liable to pay tax u/s 208 and 
the expression "assessed tax" is defined to mean the tax 
on the total income determined u/s143(1) or u/s 143(3) as 
reduced by the amount of tax deducted or collected at 
source. Thus, there is no exclusion of ss.115J/115JA in 
E 
the levy of interest u/s 2348. The expression "assessed 
tax" is defined to mean the tax assessed on regular 
assessment which means the tax determined on the 
application of s. 115J/115JA in th_e regular assessment. 
[para 8] [157-8-D] 
F 
1.3 The view of the Karnataka High Court in Kwality 
Biscuits Ltd. that interest u/s 234ยท8 could not be charged 
on the tax calculated on book profits, was not shared by 
the Gauhati High Court in Assam Bengal Carriers* Ltd 
and Madhya Pradesh High Court in /tarsi Oil and Flours G 
(P.) Limited as also by the Bombay High Court in the case 
of Kotak Mahindra Finance Ltd. which decided the issue 
in favour of Revenue _.and against the assessee. It 
appears that none of the assessees challenged the 
decisions of the Gauhati High Court, Madhya Pradesh H 
148 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[2011] 1 S.C.R. 
A 
High Court as well as Bombay High Court in the Supreme 
Court. The judgment of the Karnataka High Court in 
Kwality Biscuits Ltd., which was confined to s.115J of the 
Act, was challenged by Revenue and its special leave 
petition was dismissed by the Suprem_e Court in limine. 
B 
[(2006) 284 ITR 434). However, the Karnataka High Court 
has thereafter in the case of Jindal Thermal Power 
Company Ltd. distinguished its own decision in case of 
Kwality Biscuits Ltd. and held that s. 115JB is a self-
contained code pertaining to MAT, which imposed liability 
c for payment of advance tax on MAT companies and, 
therefore, where such companies defaulted in payment 
of advance tax in respect of tax payable u/s 115JB, it was 
liable to pay interest u/ss 2348 and 234C of the Act. [para 
9) [158-B-H; 159-A-G) 
D 
1.4 Thus, it can be concluded that interest ulss 2348 
and 234C shall be payable on failure to pay advance tax 
in respect of tax payable ulss 115JAl115JB. Therefore, 
Circular No. 1312001 dated 9.11.2001 issued by CBDT 
reported in 252 ITR (St.)50 has no application. Moreover, 
E 
in any event, para 2 of that Circular itself indicates that a 
large number of 

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.