LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

JASPAL SINGH & OTHERS versus THE STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

Citation: [2022] 15 S.C.R. 670 · Decided: 20-10-2022 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: M.R. SHAH · Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
670
SUPREME COURT REPORTS
[2022] 15 S.C.R.
JASPAL SINGH & OTHERS
v.
THE STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
(Civil Appeal Nos. 7516-7521 of 2022)
OCTOBER 20, 2022
[M. R. SHAH AND M. M. SUNDRESH, JJ.]
Land Acquisition Act,1894 – ss.4,6,11 – Compensation –
Enhancement of – Lands were acquired for Jhajjar Thermal Power
Plant under the provisions of 1894 Act – Acquisition collector
determined and awarded compensation @ Rs. 16,00,000/- per acre
– Reference court enhanced amount of compensation @
Rs.17,64,350 per acre – High Court reduced the amount of
compensation to Rs. 16,00,000/- per acre – Before Supreme Court,
landowners placed reliance upon the decision of the case Arawali
Power Company Private Limited where compensation @
25,00,000/- per acre was awarded and contention was raised that
the lands acquired in the present case and lands acquired for Arawali
Power Company Private Limited are similarly situated – Held: Both
the lands in present case and the lands in issue in the case of Arawali
Power Project are similarly situated – Further, held that considering
the Evidence on record and sale instances and considering the fact
that landowners shall be entitled to just and reasonable
compensation and taking in consideration of the Arawali Power
Company Private Limited case into account – Compensation
@22,00,000/- per acre was awarded – Judgement and order passed
by High Court was modified accordingly.
Allowing the appeals, the Court
HELD: 1. Considering the evidence on record and the sale
instances which were relied upon on behalf of the landowners
and while considering the fact that the landowners shall be entitled
to just and reasonable compensation for the lands acquired and
taking into consideration the decision of this Court in the case of
Arawali Power Company Private Limited, this Court is of the
opinion that if the landowners in the present case are awarded
compensation at the rate of Rs. 22,00,000/- per acre, the same
can be said to be just and reasonable compensation. [Para 8][676-
C-E]
[2022] 15 S.C.R. 670
670
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
671
Arawali Power Company Private Limited (Civil Appeal
No. 8757 of 2016 and connected appeals decided on
05.09.2017 by the Supreme Court) – relied on.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal Nos. 7516-
7521 of 2022.
From the Judgment and Order dated 21.03.2022 of the High Court
of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in RFA Nos. 484 of 2019, 3480
and 3457 of 2014, 4699 of 2015, 4513 and 4515 of 2018.
With
Civil Appeal Nos. 7524-7531, 7447-7448, 7449-7477, 7478-7512,
7513, 7545-7579, 7544, 7581-7584 of 2022.
Shyam Divan, Rameshwar Singh Malik, Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Sr.
Advs., Gaurav Agrawal, Pallav Mongia, Ankush Mangal, Tushar
Srivastava, Rakesh Dahiya, Aditya Dahiya, Satyavan Kudalwal, Kapil
Dahiya, Akshat Jain, Aditya Dahiya, Deepkaran Dalal, Raunaq Dalal,
Tonish Singh, Dalel Singh, Ajay Pal, Mayank Dahiya, Ms. Priyanka C.,
Kuldeep Singh Kochaliya, Jitesh Malik, Satish Kumar, Nirnimesh Dube,
Ankur S. Kulkarni, Susheel Joseph Cyriac, Ms. Sonia Dube, Ms. Uditha
Chakravarthy, M/S. Lex Regis Law Offices, Samar Vijay Singh, Vipin
Singh Bansal, Ms. Amrita Verma, Advs. for the appearing parties.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by
M. R. SHAH, J.
1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned common
judgment and order dated 21.03.2022 passed by the High Court of Punjab
and Haryana at Chandigarh in R.F.A. No. 2086/2016 and other allied
first appeals, by which the High Court has allowed the appeals preferred
by the respondents herein and has dismissed the appeals preferred by
the appellants herein – original claimants/landowners, the original
claimants/landowners have preferred the present appeals.
2. The facts leading to the present appeals in a nutshell are as
under:
That the lands situated at village Jharli, District Jhajjar, Haryana
came to be acquired for Jhajjar Thermal Power Plant. Notification under
Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as
the ‘Act 1894’) came to be issued on 09.04.2007. Declaration under
JASPAL SINGH & OTHERS v. THE STATE OF HARYANA AND
OTHERS
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
672
SUPREME COURT REPORTS
[2022] 15 S.C.R.
Section 6 of the Act, 1894 was issued on 13.11.2007. The Land
Acquisition Collector declared the award under Section 11 of the Act,
1894 and determined and awarded compensation at Rs. 16,00,000/- per
acre. The Reference Court enhanced the amount of compensation to
Rs. 17,64,350/- per acre. The acquiring body/beneficiary 

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.