LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY versus DR. HEMANT MANDOVRA

Citation: [2024] 12 S.C.R. 1038 · Decided: 13-12-2024 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: BELA M. TRIVEDI · Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2024] 12 S.C.R. 1038 : 2024 INSC 983
Indore Development Authority 
v.
Dr. Hemant Mandovra 
(Civil Appeal No. 13940 of 2024)
13 December 2024
[Bela M. Trivedi and Satish Chandra Sharma,* JJ.]
Issue for Consideration
An allotment of land to the Respondent was canceled by the 
Appellant for not paying the full amount as per the scheme. In 
a writ petition filed by the Respondent, High Court directed the 
respondent to pay the balance outstanding amount within 30 days 
and directed the appellant to handover the possession of the plot 
to the respondent. Respondent did not deposit the full amount and 
instead preferred a complaint against the Appellant in the District 
Forum, which dismissed Respondent’s complaint. In the appeal filed 
by the Respondent before  the State Commission, respondent filed 
an application under Section 13(3B) of the Consumer Protection Act, 
1986 for grant of permission to deposit the amount under protest 
with the liberty to reclaim the said amount. On such application, 
State Commission passed an interim order directing the appellant 
to accept the outstanding amount with interest and to deliver the 
possession of plot. In the revision petition, the National Commission 
directed the appellant to calculate the interest within a period of 
two weeks and after receiving the amount along with interest, to 
handover the possession of the plot within a period of three weeks 
from the date of receipt of such deposit. Whether such an order 
could have been passed by the National Commission and whether 
final relief could not have been granted by the State Commission 
on an interlocutory application.
Headnotes†
Consumer Protection – Grant of final relief by State Commission 
on an Interlocutory Application – If Proper.
Held: The District Forum was justified in dismissing the complaint of 
the respondent – The State Commission by directing the appellant 
to accept the outstanding amount with interest and to deliver the 
* Author
[2024] 12 S.C.R. 
1039
Indore Development Authority v. Dr. Hemant Mandovra
possession of plot in question to the respondent, granted a final 
relief by way of an interim order – Final relief could not have been 
granted by the State Commission on an interlocutory application 
filed in the matter – The National Commission without considering 
any ground raised by the appellant directed the appellant to receive 
and accept the amount from the respondent along with interest 
and handover the possession of the plot in question – It was the 
respondent who committed default in depositing the balance amount 
as per the terms and conditions of the NIT and even after the first 
round of litigation before the High Court, the respondent did not 
deposit the amount which was outstanding against him, even though 
appellant reduced the amount of interest to be paid and, therefore, 
at this juncture, after a lapse of 28 years, the question of directing 
the appellant as has been done by the National Commission to 
accept the amount does not arise – Resultantly, the orders passed 
by the State Commission and National Commission deserve to be 
set aside and are accordingly set aside. [Paras 10 and 11]
List of Acts
Constitution of India; Consumer Protection Act, 1986; Town and 
Country Planning Act, 1973.
List of Keywords
Tender; Allotment of land; Cancellation of allotment; Terms and 
conditions of the NIT; Premium amount; Interlocutory application; 
Interim order; Final relief; National Consumer Disputes Redressal 
Commission; State Commission; Revision petition; Lapse of time.
Case Arising From
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 13940 of 2024
From the Judgment and Order dated 29-03-2023 of the National 
Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi in RP No. 
2808 of 2018
Appearances for Parties
Amit Pawan, Adv. for the Appellant.
Udayaditya Banerjee, Adv. for the Respondent.
1040
[2024] 12 S.C.R.
Supreme Court Reports
Judgment / Order of the Supreme Court
Judgment
Satish Chandra Sharma, J. 
1.	
Leave granted.
2.	
This present petition is arising out of order dated 29.03.2023 passed 
by National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (for short, 
“the National Commission”) in Revision Petition No. 2808 of 2018 
whereby the National Commission directed the appellant to handover 
possession of the plot in question to the respondent within three 
weeks from the date the amount is paid along with interest to the 
Indore Development Authority. 
3.	
The undisputed facts of the ca

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.