LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
βš–οΈ Ask the AI about your situation:πŸš— Car AccidentπŸ’Ό Work / Job🏠 Housing / EvictionπŸ‘ͺ Family / DivorceπŸ“‹ Contract DisputeπŸ’° Money Owed

INDIAN HARD METALS (P) LTD. versus UNION OF INDIA

Citation: [1979] 2 S.C.R. 469 · Decided: 30-11-1978 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: R.S. SARKARIA · Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

cites 1 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

-
. ."' 
INDIAN HARD METALS (P) LTD. 
V. 
UNION OF INDIA 
November 30, 1978 
[R. S. SARKARIA, V. D. TuLzAPURKAR AND A. P. SEN, JJ.] 
469 
Indian Customs Tariff Act, 1934 (32 of 1934), Item Nos. 26, 70(7) 
and 
87-Wolfram ore containing tungsten ore of 75%-Whether assessable under 
Item 26 or Item 70(7) or under residuary lte1n 87. 
The appellant imported wolfram ore. The Customs Authorities classified the 
said ore under the residuary Item 87 of the Indian Customs Tariff and charged 
:luty at the, rate of 60% ad valorem. Metallic ores (Item 26) and cobalt, cbro~ 
mium, tungsten magnesium etc. 
[Item No. 70(7)1 are allowed to be imported 
free of duty. 
The aforesaid classification was upheld by the Assistant Collector of Customs 
and the appeal to the Commissioner of Customs was dismissed. The appellant's 
revision petition under s. 131 of the Customs Act to the Government was also 
A 
B 
c 
dismissed. 
D 
In the appeal to this Court it was contended on behalf of the appellant that 
the imported ore contained a concentrate of 74% of tungsten from wolfram 
and the rest were impurities, that the concentration was the result of β€’selective 
mining' process which involves crushing, washing and magnetic separation that 
in better quality ore the content may be as high as 79 % and that even after 
being subjected to such process, the ore concentrate does not cea,,e to be tungs-
E 
ten 'ore' within the contemplation of Item 70(7) of the Indian Customs Tariff. 
Allowing the appeal, 
HELD: 1. The goods imported had to be classified as imported ore, falling 
either under Item 26 or Item 70(7) of the Import Tariff, and no duty was 
leviable on them. The appellants are entitled to refund of duty paid by them. 
!475 El 
F 
2. The mere fact that the percentage of tungsten in the ore concentrate in 
the instant case is about 75% does not take the case out of the ratio of this 
Court's decision in Minerals & Metal Trading Corporation of India Ltd. v. 
Union of India & Qrs., [1973] I SCR 977. 
[471 HJ 
3. There is ample authority for the view that the tungsten content in the 
wolfram ore of marketable quality may vary from 60 to 79%, and a concentra-
tion within these limits of the metal in the ore can bo attained simply by a 
process of a "selective mining", that is by physical process not involving any 
chemical change in the metal. Wolframite of ordinary merchantable quality con-
tains 60 to 70% of tungsten, while wolframite ore of better commercial quality 
contains 75 to 79% of the metal. 
[473 C, 475 DJ 
"Tungsten" by C.J. Smithe/ls Chapman-Hall-Introduction, referred to. 
4. The finding of the appellate Collector of Customs that such a high dogree 
(75%) of the tungsten metal virll1ally free from impurities in the material, could 
be atlain<d only by some chemical manufacturing process and not merely lty 
G 
II 
470 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS 
[1979] 2 S.C.R. 
A 
cru!hing, washing or magnetic separation, is not based on any evidence whatever. 
It is contrary to the opinion of experts and authorities on the subject, which 
were brought on tbe record. [475 BJ 
CIYIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 571 of 
1969. 
B 
Appeal by Special Leave from the Order dated. the 6th September, 
c 
1968 /26th October 1968 of the Government of India, Ministry of 
Finance (llipartment of Revenue and Insurance) bearing No. 5262 of 
1968. 
!. L. Nain, Mrs. A. K. Verma for J. D. Dadachanji & Co., for the 
Appellant. 
R. B. Datar and Miss A. Subhashini, for the Respondent. 
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by 
SARKAru:A, J.-This is an appeal by special leave against \m order 
of the Government of India, Ministry of Finance (Department of 
o 
Revenue and Insurance). 
The order was passed by Shri B. Sen, 
Commissioner (Revision applications), Government of India. 
Indian 
Hard Metal (P) Ltd., the appellant, had imported 15 metric tonnes of 
wolfram ore from London. β€’ The Customs authorities classified the 
said ore under item 87 of the Indian Customs Tariff and charged 
duty at the rate of 60 per centi ad valorem 
amounting to 
E 
Rs. 62,871.03P., instead of classifying the imported ore either under 
item 26 of item 70(7) which are free from duty. 
These relevant 
items, as entered in tlle Imported Tariff, may be set out as nuder 
Item 
No. 
F 
26 
700) 
G 
87 
Name of Article 
Nature of 
Standard 
duty 
rate of 
Metallic ores all sorts except ochres and x Free 
x 
other pigments ores and antimony ore. 
Cobalt chromium tungsten magnesium x 

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.