LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

INDIAN AND EASTERN NEWSPAPER SOCIETY, NEW DELHI versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEW DELHI

Citation: [1980] 1 S.C.R. 442 · Decided: 31-08-1979 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: P.N. BHAGWATI · Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

Cited by 2 judgment(s) · cites 1 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

A 
B 
c 
D 
E 
F 
G 
H 
442 
INDIAN AND EASTERN NEWSPAPER SOCIETY. 
NEW DELHI 
v. 
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEW DELHI 
August 31, 1979 
[P. N. BHAGWATI, V. D. TuLZAPURKAR AND R. S. PATHAK, JJ.] 
Income Tax Act 1961--S. 147(b)--Scope of-"Information" "Reason 
to 
believe"-Meaning of-Opinion of audit party of Income Tax Department-If 
would comtitute "information". 
Section 147(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 provides that if an Income 
Tax Officer has, in consequence of information in his possesaion, reason to 
believe that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment for any asc;ess-
ment year, he may assess or re~s such income. 
l he internal audit organisation of the income tax department, in the course 
of auditing the income tax records pertaining to the assessee for certain assess-
ment. years stated that the assessee's in.come on account of letting out of halls 
and rooms should not have been assessed as income from business but an asses!-
-ment should have been niade uiider the head "Income from property". Treating 
the report as,information in his possession under s.147(b) the Income Tax 
Officer re-t:lSseSsed the assessee's income. The Appellate Assistant ·Com.mi.1sioner 
reversed th~ Income Tax Officer's order. On the other band, the Appellate Tribu-
nal took the view that the Income Tax Officer bad jurisdiction to proceed under 
s.14 7 ( b). In a reference under s. 257 of the Income Tax Act the question was 
whether the Income Tax Officer was legally justified in reopening the assess-
ment under s. 147 (b) on the basis of the view expressed by the Internal Audit 
party received by him subsequent to the original assessment. 
Allowing tho appeal, 
HELD : The opinion of the internal audit organization of the Department 
on a point of law cannot be regarded as information within the meaning r.f 
s. 147(b) of the Act. [455A]. 
1. {a) An assessment proceeding, which is a quasi-judicial proceeding, ac-
quires hnality on the assessment order being made. The finality of such an 
order can be disturbed only in proceedings, and within the confines, provided 
by Jaw. 
An appeal, revision and rectification are proceedings in which the 
fin51Jity of the assessment may be questioned. 
Section 147, under ·which an 
assessment may be reopened, is a proceeding for assessing income which has 
<!Caped asse,.ment. 
[446F-G] 
2. In cases falling under s. 147(b) "information" is an indispensable in· 
gredient. The word "infonnation" has been interpreted by this Court to mean 
not only facts or factual material but include information as to the true_ and 
corre:c.t state of the law and, therefore, informatiov. as to relevant 
judicial 
decision~. The term is also defined as "instruction" or knowledge derived from 
an external source concerning facts or particularF, or as to law, r.elating· to a 
matter bearing on the essessment. 
[447P-Fl 
Maharaj Kamal Singh v. Commissioner of Income Tax 35 I.T.R. 1 (S.C.)= 
[1959] Sup. I SCR 10, Commissioner of Income Tax v. Raman & Company 
67 I.T.R. 1l(SC)=[1968] I SCR 10, referred to. 
,. 
l 
IE N S V. CIT 
443 
3. -(a) By its inherent nature, a fact has concrete existence. It influences the 
A 
determination of an issue by the mere circumstance of its relevance. It require.11; 
no further authority to make it significant. (447-HJ. 
(b) The term •taw' is used in the sense of norms or guiding 
princip188 
having 
legal 
effect 
and 
legal 
consequences. To 
possess 
legal 
'1gru· 
fic:i.nce for that purpose, law must be enacted or dedared by a 
competent 
B 
authority. 
Tho legal sanction vivifying it imparts to it its force and validity 
and binding nature. 
Lnv may be statutory law enacted by a competent le~is· 
Iative authority, or it mtl'Y be judge made law emanating from a declaration or 
exposition of the content of a legal principle or the interpretation of a statute 
and may in particular cases extend to a definition of the status of a party or the 
legal relationship between the parties, the declaration being rendered by a 
competent judicial or quasi-judicial authority empowered to decide question.! 
C 
of law between contending parties. The declaration or exposition is ordinarily 
set forth in the judgment of a court or the order of a tribunal. Such de-
claration or exposition in itself bears the character of law. 
In every 
case, 
therefore, to be law it must be a creation by a formal source, either legislative 
or judicial authority. A statement by a person or body _not comp

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.