LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
βš–οΈ Ask the AI about your situation:πŸš— Car AccidentπŸ’Ό Work / Job🏠 Housing / EvictionπŸ‘ͺ Family / DivorceπŸ“‹ Contract DisputeπŸ’° Money Owed

IN RE: RIGHT TO PRIVACY OF ADOLESCENTS versus

Citation: [2025] 7 S.C.R. 216 · Decided: 22-05-2025 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: ABHAY S. OKA

cites 2 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2025] 7 S.C.R. 216 : 2025 INSC 778
In Re: Right To Privacy of Adolescents
(Suo Motu Writ Petition (C) No. 3 of 2023)
23 May 2025
[Abhay S. Oka* and Ujjal Bhuyan, JJ.]
Issue for Consideration
Issue arose as regards sentencing the accused; about the 
rehabilitation of the victim and her child; and about adopting 
measures for adolescent well being and child protection.
Headnotes†
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 – 
s.6 – Penal Code, 1860 – ss.363 and 366 – Sentencing of the 
accused – Rehabilitation of the victim and her child – Measures 
for adolescent well being and child protection – On facts, girl 
aged fourteen years victim under the POCSO Act – Victim 
married the accused and had a child with him – Acquittal of the 
accused for the offences punishable under the 2012 Act and 
IPC by the High Court, since the victim and the accused wanted 
to continue their cohabitation – In appeal thereagainst, this 
Court set aside the judgment of the High Court and restored 
the conviction of the accused for the offences punishable u/
ss.376(2)(n) and 376(3) IPC and s.6 of the POCSO Act – Issue 
as regards sentencing the accused and the suo motu writ 
petition as regards objectionable observations made in the 
impugned judgment:
Held: Final report of the Committee concludes that though the 
incident was seen as a crime in law, the victim did not treat it as 
one – In law, no option but to sentence the accused and send 
him to jail for undergoing the minimum punishment prescribed 
by the Statute – However, the society, the family of the victim 
and the legal system have done enough injustice to the victim, 
she has been subjected to enough trauma and agony and would 
add to the injustice by sending her husband to jail to undergo 
imprisonment – There has been failure to provide both social and 
economic justice to the victim, failure of the concept of welfare state, 
complete failure of the society and the legal system – However, 
* Author
[2025] 7 S.C.R. 
217
In Re: Right To Privacy of Adolescents
as compared to the situation when the incident took place, victim 
is better placed today and is comfortable with her small family – 
Earlier she did not get any opportunity to make informed choice, 
and now, she is desperate to save her husband and is emotionally 
committed to him and has become very possessive of her small 
family – To remedy the situation, the Court to ensure that the 
accused is not separated from the victim, and the State and the 
society to ensure that the family is rehabilitated – Exercising the 
jurisdiction u/Art.142, though the accused stands convicted, he 
will not undergo sentence – State to act as a true guardian of the 
victim and her child; to provide a better shelter to the victim and 
her family; to bear the expenditure of the education of the victim 
till Xth standard, the degree course, if she desires to pursue, and 
can offer her free vocational training after her Xth standard; to 
bear the entire expenditure of the education of the child up to Xth 
standard and ensure that she is educated in a very good school; 
and to take the assistance of NGOs for securing debts incurred by 
victim – State to file compliance report regarding implementation 
of the said directions – Secretary, Ministry of Women and Child 
Development to appoint Committee of experts to deal with the 
suggestions of amici curiae, and thereafter submit detailed report. 
[Paras 23-31]
Case Law Cited
Shilpa Sailesh v. Varun Sreenivasan [2023] 5 SCR 165 : (2023)Β 14 
SCC 231; K. Dhandapani v. State, 2022 SCC OnLine SC 1056; 
Sankar v. State of Tamil Nadu, Curative Petition (Criminal) 
3/2023; Elumalai v. Inspector of Police, Crl. Appeal No. 674 of 
2018; Gian Singh v. State of Punjab [2012] 8 SCR 753 : (2012) 
10 SCC 303 – referred to.
Ajay Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi), 2022 SCC OnLine Del 
3705; Vijayalakshmi v. State, 2021 SCC OnLine Mad 317; 
Ranjit Rajbanshi v. State of West Bengal, 2021 SCC OnLine Cal  
2470 – referred to.
List of Acts
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012; Penal 
Code, 1860; Constitution of India; Code of Criminal Procedure, 
1973; Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015.
218
[2025] 7 S.C.R.
Supreme Court Reports
List of Keywords
Sentencing; Rehabilitation of victim and her child; Adopting 
measures for adolescent well being and child protection; Suo motu 
writ petition; Final report of the Committee; Minimum punishment; 
Family of the victim; Imprisonm

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.