IN RE: FELLING OF TREES IN AAREY FOREST (MAHARASHTRA) versus IN RE: FELLING OF TREES IN AAREY FOREST (MAHARASHTRA)
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
A B C D E F G H 392 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2023] 6 S.C.R. IN RE: FELLING OF TREES IN AAREY FOREST (MAHARASHTRA) IA No. 68608 of 2023 In (Suo Moto Writ (Civil) No. 2 of 2019) APRIL 17, 2023 [DR. DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD, CJI, PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA AND J. B. PARDIWALA, JJ.] Environment – Felling of trees – By order dated 29.11.2022, MMRCL was permitted to move the Tree Authority on its application for felling of 84 trees – On 02.01.2023, MMRCL, however, sought permission to cut 185 trees, without moving Supreme Court – On 15.03.2023, the Superintendent of Gardens and Tree Officer granted permission for felling 124 trees and transplanting 53 trees, subject to the condition that 1533 trees would be planted on the property – The High Court held that propriety would require that trees shall not be felled in pursuance of the order dated 15.03.2023 until a clarification was sought from Supreme Court – Application for clarification filed in Supreme Court – Held: It was improper on the part of MMRCL to move the Tree Authority for the felling of any trees in excess of 84 trees – If circumstances had transpired which led to a variation in the number of trees to be cut, the only correct course of action would have been to move Supreme Court – Now, any direction to stay permission granted on 15.03.2023 would bring the public project to a standstill – Therefore, the previous order is modified by permitting MMRCL to act in compliance with the order dated 15.03.2023 – However, it would be necessary to penalize MMRCL for its conduct – MMRCL directed to deposit an amount of Rs. 10 lakhs with the conservator of forests – Conservator of Forests to ensure all directions issued with regard to afforestation and for transplantation of trees are complied with and submit report – I.A. disposed of. CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION: IA No. 68608 of 2023 in Suo Moto Writ (Civil) No. 2 of 2019. [2023] 6 S.C.R. 392 392 A B C D E F G H 393 Under Article 32 of The Constitution of India By Courts Motion Tushar Mehta, Shyam Divan, Gopal Sankaranarayan, Dhruv Mehta, Maninder Singh, C.U. Singh, Sr. Advs., Chirag Shah, Ms. Rukhmini Bobde, Ms. Soumya Priyadarshinee, Ankit Ambasta, Amit Kumar Shrivastava, Amlaan Kumar, Vishal Prasad, Ms. Pooja Dhar, Tushad Kakalia, Sudipto Sarkar, Ms. Aditi Gupta, Ashish Wad, Sandip Patil, Sidharth Mahajan, Ajeyo Sharma, Shyam Agarwal, M/s. J S Wad and Co, Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, Bharat Bagla, Sourav Singh, Shree Pal Singh, Ms. Anitha Shenoy, Ms. Srishti Agnihotri, Ms. Sanjana Thomas, Advs. for the Respondent. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by DR. DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD, CJI 1. Mumbai Metro Rail Corporation Limited1 seeks a clarification of the order of this Court dated 29 November 2022. By the order of this Court, MMRCL was permitted to move the Tree Authority for felling 84 trees. MMRCL submits that 177 trees have to be felled or, as the case may be, transplanted for the Metro Car Shed Land at Aarey Colony admeasuring approximately 33 hectares for Mumbai Metro Line-3. Permission is hence sought to implement the permission which has been granted on 15 March 2023 by the Superintendent of Gardens of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai for felling 124 trees and transplanting 53 trees. 2. By the order of this Court dated 29 November 2022, an earlier order directing the preservation of the status quo on felling trees was modified, so as to permit MMRCL to move the Tree Authority on its application for felling 84 trees. Following the order of this Court, an application was initially moved on 19 December 2022 for permission to fell 84 trees. On 2 January 2023, MMRCL, however, sought permission to cut 185 trees, without moving this Court. 3. By a communication dated 20 December 2022, the Deputy Superintendent of Gardens intimated the Deputy General Manager (Depot) of MMRCL that the site was jointly inspected by his staff, together with the representatives of MMRCL on 19 December 2022. Following 1 “MMRCL” IN RE: FELLING OF TREES IN AAREY FOREST (MAHARASHTRA) A B C D E F G H 394 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2023] 6 S.C.R. the inspection, the Deputy Superintendent of Gardens sought compliance on the following aspects: “1. Submit updated proposal for the current status of trees as per a fresh survey. 2. Mention missing/dead/fallen trees and also any new addition to the list of affected trees as a long period has lapsed since the last survey. 3. Number all such trees on the sites with black and w
Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex