LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

IN RE: COMPENSATION AMOUNTS DEPOSITED WITH MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNALS AND LABOUR COURTS versus NA

Citation: [2025] 4 S.C.R. 1613 · Decided: 22-04-2025 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: ABHAY S. OKA

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2025] 4 S.C.R. 1613 : 2025 INSC 530
In Re: Compensation Amounts Deposited with Motor  
Accident Claims Tribunals and Labour Courts
(Suo Motu Writ Petition (C) No. 7 of 2024)
22 April 2025
[Abhay S. Oka* and Ujjal Bhuyan, JJ.]
Issue for Consideration
Issue arose in this suo motu writ petition with respect to the large 
amounts of unclaimed compensation lying deposited with MACTs 
and Labour Courts under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and the 
Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923.
Headnotes†
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 – ss.166, 176 – Workmen’s 
Compensation Act, 1923 – Large amounts of unclaimed 
compensation lying with MACTs and Labour Courts – Email 
received from a retired District Judge – Suo motu action by 
Supreme Court – Directions issued:
Held: Rules u/s.176, 1988 Act not made by the State Governments – 
Till rules are not framed, High Courts to issue practice directions 
or formulate rules of procedure by incorporating the provisions, 
as directed, for claims under the 1988 Act and claims for 
compensation under the 1923 Act – Central Project Co-ordinator 
of e-court project or Registrar (Computer/IT) of the High Courts, 
with the help of the State Government, to create a dashboard on 
which the information regarding the amounts lying deposited in 
connection with the compensation granted under 1988 or 1923 
Acts shall be regularly uploaded with all details – High Courts to 
issue administrative directions to the MACT and Commissioners 
under the 1923 Act to initiate a massive drive to ascertain the 
whereabouts of the persons who have been held to be entitled to 
receive compensation, but have not taken the same – This shall 
be done by taking the assistance of the District and Taluka Legal 
Services Authorities and para-legal volunteers – State Governments 
to provide assistance to the Legal Services Authorities of the local 
police officers/revenue officers of the district and taluka to trace the 
claimants who are held entitled to receive compensation – State 
* Author
1614
[2025] 4 S.C.R.
Supreme Court Reports
Legal Services Authorities to monitor compliance with the directions 
issued in terms thereof and report compliance within four months – 
Directions issued bind the MAC Tribunals and the Commissioners 
under the 1923 Act till rule-making power is properly exercised 
by the Government – However, if the Rules framed by the State 
Government or practice directions issued are consistent with the 
above directions, the Rules or the practice directions, as the case 
may be, shall be followed notwithstanding this order – Directions 
by Supreme Court. [Paras 9-11]
List of Acts
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988; Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923.
List of Keywords
Suo motu Writ Petition; Unclaimed compensation; Section 166 and 
176 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988; Motor Accident Claims Tribunal 
(MACT); Labour Courts; Commissioners under the Workmen’s 
Compensation Act, 1923; Practice directions; Directions by Supreme 
Court; Compensation dashboard.
Case Arising From
Civil Original Jurisdiction: Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No. 7 of 2024
Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India
Appearances for Parties
By Courts Motion.
Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Sr. Adv./Amicus Curiae, Ms. Vishakha
Advs. for the appearing parties:
High Court of Madras:  Deepayan Mandal, Mridul Bansal,  
Naman Varma.
High Court of Calcutta:  Partha Sil, Ms. Sayani Bhattacharya, 
Srijit Datta.
High Court of Delhi:  Kanhaiya Singhal, Prasanna, Ajay Kumar.
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad:  Ms. Charu Ambwani.
High Court of Bombay:  Prashant Shrikant Kenjale.
State of Gujarat:  Ms. Deepanwita Priyanka.
[2025] 4 S.C.R. 
1615
In Re: Compensation Amounts Deposited with  
Motor Accident Claims Tribunals and Labour Courts
Judgment / Order of the Supreme Court
Order
Abhay S. Oka, J.
1)	
An email was received by this Court from Shri B. B. Pathak, a 
retired District Judge from Gujarat. In the e-mail dated 25th May 
2024, Shri Pathak pointed out that large amounts payable by way 
of compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short, ‘the 
1988 Act’) and the Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923 (for short, 
‘the 1923 Act’) are lying deposited with the Motor Accident Claims 
Tribunals (for short, ‘the MAC Tribunals’) and Labour Courts. Hon’ble 
the Chief Justice of India passed an administrative order on the 
basis of information received by e-mail from Shri B. B. Pathak for 
registration of the present Suo Motu Writ Petition.
2)	
On 8th July 2024, this Court issue

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.