LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

HORRMAL (DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LRS & ORS. versus STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

Citation: [2024] 10 S.C.R. 1709 · Decided: 21-10-2024 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: SURYA KANT · Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

cites 9 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2024] 10 S.C.R. 1709 : 2024 INSC 797
Horrmal (Deceased) Through His LRs & Ors. 
v.  
State of Haryana & Ors.
(Civil Appeal No. 11758 of 2024)
21 October 2024 
[Surya Kant* and K.V. Viswanathan, JJ.]
Issue for Consideration
(1)	
Whether the appellants are entitled to higher compensation 
for their acquired lands, and if so, to what extent; and 
(2)	
Whether the methodology for calculating the quantum of such 
compensation has been appropriately applied.
Headnotes†
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 – ss.4, 6, 23(1) – Assessment 
of Market Value for Acquired Lands – Comparable Sales 
Method – Deduction for Developmental Charges:
Held: Compensation for acquired lands must reflect their fair 
market value as of the date of the Section 4 notification – The 
"comparable sales method" is the preferred approach, using 
bona fide sales exemplars of similar land – The ‘market value’ is 
to be assessed with reference to factors such as standing crops 
and trees, the severance of part of the land, damage to movable 
or immovable property or earnings, the need to relocate one’s 
residence or business, and any loss of profits from the land 
between the publication of the declaration under Section 6 and 
the Collector's assumption of possession – Sale deeds of smaller 
parcels can be considered but must undergo appropriate deductions 
to account for developmental charges – Deductions may range from 
20% to 75%, depending on the nature and location of the land.  
[Paras 18, 19, 26, 30]
Compensation – Reliance on Best Sale Exemplars – Judicial 
Guidelines for Determination of Fair Value:
Held: When multiple comparable sale exemplars exist, the highest 
bona fide exemplar should be preferred, provided it meets legal 
* Author
1710
[2024] 10 S.C.R.
Digital Supreme Court Reports
criteria – Even when averaging values, the highest exemplar may 
be considered to ensure fair compensation – The Reference Court’s 
valuation of ₹92,62,500 per acre aligns with market potential and 
statutory requirements, and the High Court erred in reducing it. 
[Paras 28, 35, 37]
Principle of Potentiality – Strategic Location of Acquired 
Land – Enhancement of Compensation:
Held: The acquired land’s strategic location and potential for non-
agricultural development must be factored into the compensation. 
Lands situated near urban areas, major highways, or industrial 
zones have higher potential value – Deductions should not 
undermine this potentiality. [Paras 32, 33, 36]
Case Law Cited
Mehrawal Khewaji Trust v. State of Punjab [2012] 4 SCR 24 : 
(2012) 5 SCC 432; A. Natesam Pillai v. Tahsildar [2010] 10 SCR 
1 : (2010) 9 SCC 118; General Manager, Oil and Natural Gas 
Corporation Ltd. v. Rameshbhai Jivanbhai Patel [2008] 11 SCR 
927 : (2008) 14 SCC 745; Kanwar Singh v. Union of India [1998] 
Supp. 2 SCR 505 : (1998) 8 SCC 136; Subh Ram v. State of 
Haryana [2009] 15 SCR 287 : (2010) 1 SCC 444; Chimanlal 
Hargovinddas v. LAO [1988] Supp. 1 SCR  531 : (1988) 3 SCC 
751; Shaji Kuriakose v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. [2001] Supp. 1 
SCR 573 : (2001) 7 SCC 650; Administrator General of West 
Bengal v. Collector, Varanasi [1988] 2 SCR 1025 : (1988) 2 SCC 
150; Atma Singh v. State of Haryana and Others [2007] 12 SCR 
1120 : (2008) 2 SCC 568; Balwan Singh v. State of Haryana and 
others, 2022 SCC Online SC 637; Karan Singh v. Union of India 
[1997] Supp. 4 SCR 237 : (1997) 8 SCC 186; Rishi Pal Singh 
v. Meerut Development Authority [2006] 2 SCR 508 : (2006) 3 
SCC 205; Sh. Himmat Singh v. State of M.P., (2013) 16 SCC 
392 – relied on.
Dollar Co. v. Collector of Madras, AIR 1975 SC 1670; Special 
Land Acquisition Officer v. T. Adinarayan Setty, AIR 1959 SC 429; 
Maya Devi v. State of Haryana [2018] 1 SCR 225 : (2018) 2 SCC 
474 – referred to.
[2024] 10 S.C.R. 
1711
Horrmal (Deceased) Through His LRs & Ors. v.  
State of Haryana & Ors.
List of Acts
Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Haryana Urban Development Authority 
Act, 1977.
List of Keywords
Land Acquisition; Market Value; Comparable Sales Method; 
Development Charges; Potentiality of Land.
Case Arising From
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 11758 of 2024
From the Judgment and Order dated 23.08.2022 of the High Court 
of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh in RFA No. 13554 of 2018
With
Civil Appeal Nos. 11759-11760, 11761, 11762-11766, 11767-11770, 
11771-11772, 11773-11779, 11780-11786, 11787-11796, 11797, 
11798, 11799, 11800-11806, 11807, 11808, 11809, 11810, 11811-
11812, 11813,11814, 11815, 11816, 11817, 11818-

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.