LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
โš–๏ธ Ask the AI about your situation:๐Ÿš— Car Accident๐Ÿ’ผ Work / Job๐Ÿ  Housing / Eviction๐Ÿ‘ช Family / Divorce๐Ÿ“‹ Contract Dispute๐Ÿ’ฐ Money Owed

HIRALAL MOTILAL PARIKH (DECEASED THROUGH LRS) versus SPL. LAQ OFFICER & ANR.

Citation: [2025] 3 S.C.R. 1519 · Decided: 27-03-2025 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: J.K. MAHESHWARI · Disposal: Case Partly allowed

cites 2 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

[2025] 3 S.C.R. 1519 : 2025 INSC 815
Hiralal Motilal Parikh (Deceased Through Lrs) 
v. 
Spl. LAQ Officer & Anr.
(Civil Appeal No. 1438 of 2016)
27 March 2025
[J.K. Maheshwari* and Aravind Kumar, JJ.]
Issue for Consideration
Whether the compensation awarded by the Reference Court, 
marginally enhanced by the High Court along with other statutory 
benefits is fair and reasonable.
Headnotesโ€ 
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 โ€“ Compensation โ€“ Enhancement 
of โ€“ Document proximate to the date of notification, if can be 
considered as exemplar for determination of compensation:
Held: Bona fide transaction of sale, if proximate to the land acquired 
and the date, in absence of any evidence that acquisition has 
not motivated the purchaser to pay a higher price on account of 
resultant improvement in development prospects, can be relied 
upon while determining the compensation โ€“ Exhibit 53 (the sale 
deed of an adjoining land, executed within a month from the date 
of notification of s.4 LAA, indicating the value at Rs.152.37/- per 
square metre) is accepted as exemplar โ€“ Purchaser of the land 
was not motivated to pay the higher price for execution of the said 
sale deed โ€“ Furthermore, even prior to the notification, the land 
was allotted at the rate of Rs.65/- per square metre [Exhibit 44, 
an allotment letter] โ€“ Said exemplar is also relevant to determine 
the fair and reasonable amount of compensation โ€“ Compensation 
as determined by the High Court at the rate of Rs.53/- per square 
metre is on the lower side โ€“ Mean of the exemplars Exhibits 44 
and Exhibit 53 [i.e., (65 + 152.37) / 2] comes to Rs.108.68/- per 
square metre โ€“ Thus, compensation of the land be determined at 
the rate of Rs.107/- per square metre. [Paras 9, 11, 15, 16] 
Case Law Cited
Union of India v. Raj Kumar Baghal Singh (Dead) Through Legal 
Representatives and Others [2014] 7 SCR 709 : (2014) 10 SCC 422; 
*โ€ƒAuthor
1520
[2025] 3 S.C.R.
Supreme Court Reports
Mehta Ravindrarai Ajitrai (Deceased) Through His Heirs and LRs. and 
Others v. State of Gujarat [1989] 3 SCR 743 : (1989) 4 SCC 250; 
Chimanlal Hargovinddas v. Special Land Acquisition Officer, Poona 
and Anr. [1988] Supp. 1 SCR 531 : (1988) 3 SCC 751 โ€“ relied on.
List of Acts
Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
List of Keywords
Land acquisition; Fair and reasonable amount of compensation; 
Enhancement of compensation; Compensation enhanced; 
Exemplars; Exemplars Exhibits; Documents proximate to the date 
of notification and the land acquired; Exemplar for determination 
of compensation; Bona fide transaction of sale; Proximate to the 
land acquired and the date of notification; Purchaser of the land not 
motivated to pay the higher price; Reference Court; Compensation 
on the lower side; Mean of the exemplars.
Case Arising From
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 1438 of 2016
From the Judgment and Order dated 20.07.2015 of the High Court 
of Judicature at Gujarat at Ahmedabad in FA No. 1036 of 2002
Appearances for Parties
Advs. for the Appellant:
Harin P. Raval, Sr. Adv., Ms. Anushree Prashit Kapadia, Ms. Urmi 
H Raval, Ms. Shreya Bansal, Ms. Shrestha Narayan, Siddhartha 
H Raval, Ms. Shivangi Chawla.
Advs. for the Respondents:
Ms. Deepanwita Priyanka, Deepak Singh.
Judgment / Order of the Supreme Court
Judgment
J.K. Maheshwari, J.
1.	
Arising out of the order dated 20.07.2015 passed by the High Court 
of Gujarat in the First Appeal No. 1036 of 2002 preferred by the legal 
[2025] 3 S.C.R. 
1521
Hiralal Motilal Parikh (Deceased Through Lrs) v.  
Spl. LAQ Officer & Anr.
representatives of the original claimant, assailing the award dated 
05.11.20011 passed by the Reference Court; which was against the 
award passed on 30.07.19882 by Special Land Acquisition Officer (in 
short โ€˜LAOโ€™), the present appeal has been preferred. In this appeal, 
the adequacy of compensation granted by the LAO, the Reference 
Court and also the High Court has been questioned.
2.	
For the sake of convenience, it is noted that the subject land is 
non-agricultural bearing Survey No. 25, admeasuring about 33387 
sq. mtrs., situated at village/taluka โ€˜Mehmedabadโ€™, District โ€“ Kheda, 
Gujarat, which was acquired by Gujarat Housing Board for residential/
housing/construction purpose. The notification under Section 4 of the 
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as โ€˜LAAโ€™ for brevity) 
was published on 30.07.1985, followed by notification under Section 6 
dated 31.07.1986. After inviting objections, compensation at the r

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.