HINDUSTAN PAPER CORPORATION LTD. versus GOVERNMENT OF KERALA & OTHERS
Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this caseJudgment (excerpt)
-
581
HINDUSTAN PAPER CORPORATION LTD.
A
v.
GOVERNMENT OF KERAIA & OTHERS
APRIL 16, 1986
[E,S, VENKATARAMIAH AND M,P, TIIAKKAR, JJ,]
B
Constitution of
India,
1950 -
Article 19(6)(ii) -
,
Governmant
owned
industry
Necessity
for
grant
of
concessions.
Kerala Forest Produce (Fixation of Selling Price) Act,
1978 - Section 6 - Constitutional validity of -
Action of
C
1" State Governrent exemptiag Governmant companies from operation
.>. of section 5 of the Act - Whether valid and legal.
The Kerala Forest Produce (Fixation of Selling Price)
Act, 1978 was enacted with the object of providing for the
procedure to be followed in fixing the selling pri<:<!s of
D
certain important forest produce, for the prohibition of the
sale of such forest produce at less than the prices so fixed
and for matters incidental or ancillary thereto. The Act
,,._ governs only those forests which are considered as "reserved
forests" within the meaning of Kerala Forests Act, 1961 and
forests vested in the Government under s, 3 of the Kerala
E
Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act 1971,
Section 6 provides that the Government may in public
-~ interest, by Notification in the Gazette, exempt the sale of
any forest produce (a) to any company owned by the Central
~ Government or the Government of Kerala, and (b) not exceeding
F
10 cubic meters, to any co-operative society registered or
deemed
to
be
registered
under
the Kerala Co-operative
Societies Act, 1969 from the provisions of s. 5 subject to
such conditions and restrictions as may be specified in the
Notification.
On
March
9,
1979,
the respondent-State Government
published a Notification exempting the appellant-company, the
Kerala State Bamboo Corporation Ltd. and the Travancore
Private Industries Ltd. from the provisions of s.5 4nd fixed
the price below which forest produce covered by the Act could
not be sold.
G
H
A
B
c
D
E
F
G
H
582
SUPREME COURT REPORTS
[1986] 2 S.C.R.
Two private sector companies filed writ petitions under
Art, 226 questioning the constitutional validity of s,6 and ~
the
Notification
granting
exemption
in
favour
of
the
appellant-company and two Government owned companies, The
petitions were opposed alleging that s.6 of the Act was
constitutionally valid. At the hearing of the petitions, the
Additional Advocate--{;eneral appearing for the respondent-State
Government conceded that s. 6 of the Act was unconstitutional.
The High Court, therefore, held that s. 6 of the Act was
violative of Art. 14 and struck down the same as well as the ~
Notification.
The appellant-company filed appeals to this Court.
Though no appeal was filed by the State Government, at the ;,,-
hearing the counsel for respondent-State Government stated -r
that the concession made by the counsel for the State before ....
the High Court, was incorrect and supported the validity of s.
6 of the Act and the Notification granting exemption.
Allowing the appeals,
HELD: 1. The decision of the High Court that s. 6 of the
Kerala Forest Produce (Fixation of Selling Price) Act, 1978
was violative of Art. 14 of the Constitution is liable to be
set aside, [595 C)
-fl
2. Section 6 of the Act confers the power on the State
Government to grant exemption from the provisions of s. 5 of
the Act. The power conferred under s. 6 is not unfettered, The
Government
can grant the exemption only in the
public
~
interest. Such exemption can be granted only to a company
owned by the Central Government or the Government of Kerala.
-~
[590 0-E)
3. Under cl. (b) of s.6 any sale of forest produce not
exceeding
10
cubic
meters
effected in favour
of
any
co-operative society registered or deemed to be registered
under the Ker ala Co-operative Societies Act 1969 may be
exempted from s. 5 of the Act by the State Government. [590 E)
4. While issuing the notification granting exemption it
is open to the State Government
to impose appropriate
conditions and restrictions. The State Government has to bear
in mind the entire policy and the object of the Act before
exercising its power under s. 6. [590 F-C)
-
H.P. CORPN, v. GOVT. OF KERALA [VENKATARAMIAH, J,]
583
S. So far as consumers of forest produce who are not
A
• granted any exemption under s. 6 are concerned any sale of
forest produce in their favour cannot be effocted at a price
less than the price notified under s, 3 of the Act. The
notified price has
to beExcerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.
Lex