LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

H.A. MARTIN & OTHERS versus MOSES THAMBI PILLAI & OTHERS

Citation: [2014] 9 S.C.R. 530 · Decided: 04-09-2014 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: JASTI CHELAMESWAR · Disposal: Appeal(s) allowed

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

A 
B 
[2014] 9 S.C.R. 530 
H.A. MARTIN & OTHERS 
v. 
MOSES THAMBI PILLAI & OTHERS 
(Civil Appeal No. 8458 of 2014) 
SEPTEMBER 04, 2014 
[J. CHELAO/IESWAR AND A.K. SIKRI, JJ.] 
Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975 - s. 53 -
Tamil Evangelical Lutheran Church (TELC) - Whether a 
C Society registered under the Act in view of s. 53 - Held: TELC 
is not a Society governed by the provisions of the Act - Act 
is not applicable to TELC at all - Thus, the issue of exemption 
from the provisions of the Act did not arise - Section 53 
declares that every Society registered under the 1860 Act shall 
D be deemed to be registered under the 1975 Act - Such 
construction is not called for in view of the scheme of the Act 
and more particularly scheme of s. 4 - s. 4(3) expressly 
excludes the operation of s. 4(1) and 4(2) thereby relieving 
both the classes of Societies-the Societies formed after 
E coming into the existence of the 1975 Act and the Societies 
which were in existence but not registered under any law prior 
to the commencement of the 1975 Act covered by Section 
4(1) and 4(2) which have for their object the promotion of 
religion - Such an interpretation which would be in violation 
F of Art. 14 is required to be avoided - There can neither be 
any reasonable basis for such classification nor any purpose 
to be achieved by such classification - Neither of the parties 
nor the administration or the judiciary (Bar & Bench) had the 
time nor inclination to examine the scheme of the 1975 Act, 
which resulted in wastage of time of the judiciary as well as 
G the administration - Societies Requistration Act, 1860. 
H 
The question which arose for consideration before . 
this Court was whether a Society such as Tamil 
530 
H.A. MARTIN. v. MOSES THAMBI PILLAI 
531 
Evangelical Lutheran Church is required to be treated as 
A 
Society registered under the Tamil Nadu Societies 
Registration Act, 1975 in view of the operation of Section 
53 of the Act. 
Allowing the appeal, the Court 
B 
HELD: 1.1. Various provisions of the Tamil Nadu 
Societies Registration Act, 1975 seek to. regulate the 
activities of the Societies registered under the Act. The 
expression "registered society" by definition under 
Section 2(h) means a Society either registered or deemed 
C 
to be registered under the Act. Section 3 of the Act 
specifies various classes of Societies which could be 
registered under the Act i.e. Societies which have for their 
object the promotion of education, literature, science, . 
religion, charity, social reform, art, crafts etc. Section 4(1) 
D 
mandates that Societies which came into existence after 
the commencement of the Act to be compulsorily 
registered. Section 4(2) mandates the registration of some 
Societies which were in existence as on the date of 
existence of the Act. It can be seen from the language of 
E 
Section 4(2) that only those existing Societies which 
were not registered either under the 1860 Act or under 
any other law which was in force in the State of Tamil 
Nadu prior to the 1975 Act to be compulsorily registered. 
Such obligation to compulsorily register (Societies) 
F 
arising either under Section 4(1) or Section 4(2) does not 
extend to Societies whose object is the promotion of 
religion. Because under Section 4(3), Societies 
established with the object of promoting either religion 
or athletics or sports, are expressly excluded from the 
G 
obligations even if they answer the description of a 
Society-referred to, either under Section 4(1) or 4(2). [Para 
21] [542-C-G] 
1.2. No doubt, Section 53 declares that every Society 
registered under the 1860 Act shall be deemed to be 
H 
532 
SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014] 9 S.C.R. 
A registered under the 1975 Act. Such a construction is not 
called for in view of the scheme of the Act and more 
particularly scheme of Section 4 of the Act. Section 4(3) 
expressly excludes the operation of Section 4(1) and 4(2) 
thereby relieving both the classes of Societies-the 
B Societies formed after coming into the existence of the 
1975 Act and the Societies which were in existence but 
• 
not registered under any law prior to the commencement 
of the 1975 Act - covered by Section 4(1) and 4(2) which 
have for their object the promotion of religion. The 
c expression "Societies" (registered under the 1860 Act) 
occurring in Section 53 must be understood to mean only 
those Societies which do not fall under the exemption 
granted under Section 4(3) of the Ac

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.