LexaceLexace Ask the AI ›
⚖️ Ask the AI about your situation:🚗 Car Accident💼 Work / Job🏠 Housing / Eviction👪 Family / Divorce📋 Contract Dispute💰 Money Owed

GULAM ABBAS & ORS. versus STATE OF U.P. & ORS.

Citation: [1982] 1 S.C.R. 1077 · Decided: 03-11-1981 · Supreme Court of India · Bench: V.D. TULZAPURKAR · Disposal: Case Allowed

Cited by 2 judgment(s) · cites 8 · see the full citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

Judgment (excerpt)

-
\ f 
1011 
A 
GULAM ABBAS & ORS. 
v. 
STATE OF U.P. & ORS. 
November 3, 1981 
[V. D. TULZAPURKAR, D. A. DESAI AND A.P. SEN, JJ.] 
Constitution of India, 1950, Articles 25 and 26-Right to enjoy the religious 
faith and performance of religious rites, practices and observances on ctrtain plots 
and properties belonging to Shia community, which have already been adjudicated, 
determined and declared in their earlier /itigalion-Whtther such a right is 
enforceable through a peti lion under Article 32 of the Constitution-Scope of 
Article 32. 
Res Judicata, bar of-Civil Procedure Code, section 11, explained. 
Uttar Pradtsh Muslim Wakf Act, 1960 (Act XVI of 1960) repealing Uttar 
• 
Pradesh Muslim Wakf Act, 1936 (Act XIII of 1936-Lega/ position as to the fina-
lity of Survey Reports and effect of regiJtration of Wakfs already made under the 
earlier A.ct long before it was repealed-Words and phrases--" Every other Wakf" 
B 
c 
D 
in section 29 of the 1960 Act, meaning of. 
E 
Criminal Procedure Code. 1973, section 144-Whtlher an order made under 
section 144 Criminal Procednre Code is judicial or quasi-judicial order or whether 
it is passed in exercise of an executive power in performance of executive function 
amenable to writ jurisdiction· under Article 32 of the Constitution-Nature and 
power under the section and what it authorises the executive magistracy to do 
and in what circumstances, explained. 
F 
In MohaUa Doshipura of Varanasi city, there are two sects of Mohame-
dans-the Shias and the Sunnis. Both the sects revere the martyrdom of Hazrat 
Imam Hasan and Hazrat Imam Hussain, grand-sons of Prophet Mohammed, 
during the Moharram but in a different manner. 
Nine plots bearing Nos. 245, 
246, 247, 248/23/72, 602, 603, 602/1133, 246/1134 and 247/1130 in the said 
Mohalla and buildings and structures thereon belong to the Shia Waqf of 
Mohalla Doshipura. Shias of that Mohalla numbering about 4000 constitute a reli-
gious denomination having a common faith and they observe Moharram for two 
months and eight days in a year in memory of Hazrat Imam Hussain who along 
with his 72 followers attained martyrdom at Karbala in Iraq. The said religious 
belief is practised by the men.folk and the women-folk of the Shia community 
by holding Majlises (religious discourses), Recitations, Nowbas, Marsia, doing 
G 
H 
A 
c 
0 
l!l 
F 
G 
1078 
slJPREME COURT REPORTS 
(1982J 1 s.c.a.. 
Matam (wailing) and taking out processions witb Tabut Tazia, Alams, Zulzinba, 
etc. For performing these religious rites, practices and observances the Shia 
community has been customarily using from time immemorial the nine plots in 
Mohalla Doshipura and the structures thereon. The entire period of Moharram 
is a period of mourning for the Shias whose staunch belief is that the whole pur~ 
pose of their life is to carry out these religious practices and functions during the 
Moharram and that in case they do not perform all these rites, practices, obser-
vances and functions, including those relating to the Tazia, they will never be 
delivered and till these are performed the whole comn1unity will be in mourning 
and in none of their families any marriage or other happy function can take 
place. 
The petitioners, in the writ petition, and through them the Shia community, 
contended as follows : (i) that their customary rights to perform several religious 
rites, practices, observances and functions on the said nine plots and the structu· 
res thereon having been already determined in their favour by decisions of com-
petent civil courts ending with the Review Petition 36/77 in Civil Appeal 941/76 
in the Supreme Court, the respondents must be con1manded by a mandamus not 
to prohibit or restrain the $bias from performing their religious rites etc. on the 
said plots; (ii) that the registration of Shia Waqfs concerning the plots and struc-
tures for performance of these practices and functions under sections 5 and 38 of 
the Uttar Pradesh Muslim Wakfs Act, 1936, which had become final as no suit 
challenging the Commissioner's report and registration was filed within two years 
by any member of Sunni Community or the Sunni Central Wakf Board, also 
concluded the said rights .in their favour; and (iii) that the power under section 
144 Criminal Procedure Code is being invariably ex:ercised perversely and in 
uiter disregard of the lawful exercise of Shias' legal rights to perform their reli-
gious ceremonies and functions and instead of being exe

Excerpt shown. Read the full judgment & AI analysis in Lexace.